Literature DB >> 15520686

Comparing orthodontic treatment outcome between orthodontists and general dentists with the ABO index.

Yumi Abei1, Suchitra Nelson, B Douglas Amberman, Mark G Hans.   

Abstract

This study used the American Board of Orthodontics (ABO) Objective Grading System (ABO index) (ABOI) to compare treatment outcome between patients treated by orthodontic specialists (OS) and patients treated by general dentists (GP). The sample (n = 196) consisted of 126 dental casts of patients treated by OS and 70 treated by GPs. All casts were collected in 1997 and 1998 from 10th grade students attending high schools in Cuyahoga County, Ohio, and were scored by 1 operator (Y.A.) calibrated in the use of the ABOI. The mean ABOI score for the OS group was 26.0 +/- 11.4 compared with 29.6 +/- 12.8 for the GP group. This difference was significant at the P < or = .05 level. Of the 7 components used in the ABOI, alignment of teeth was found to be the most significant between groups (OS mean = 5.39 +/- 4.37 versus GP mean = 7.8 +/- 5.21, P < or = .0007). In this sample, a significantly lower ABOI score was found for patients treated by OS compared with patients treated by GP.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15520686     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2003.11.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop        ISSN: 0889-5406            Impact factor:   2.650


  7 in total

1.  Orthodontic treatment outcomes obtained by application of a finishing protocol.

Authors:  Alvaro Carvajal-Flórez; Diana María Barbosa-Lis; Oscar Arturo Zapata-Noreña; Julissa Andrea Marín-Velásquez; Sergio Andrés Afanador-Bayona
Journal:  Dental Press J Orthod       Date:  2016 Mar-Apr

2.  Influence of premolar extractions on long-term adult facial aesthetics and apparent age.

Authors:  Guilherme Janson; Cintia Helena Zingaretti Junqueira; Lucas Marzullo Mendes; Daniela Gamba Garib
Journal:  Eur J Orthod       Date:  2015-06-11       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Quality of orthodontic treatment performed by orthodontists and general dentists.

Authors:  Leandro Silva Marques; Nacler de Freitas Junior; Luciano José Pereira; Maria Letícia Ramos-Jorge
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2011-08-01       Impact factor: 2.079

4.  Prioritized Commitment-Based Clinical Assessment: A New Method for Assessment of Orthodontic Treatment Outcomes.

Authors:  Seyed Mohammadreza Safavi; Arash Farzan; Farnaz Younessian; Alireza Akbarzadeh Baghban
Journal:  Turk J Orthod       Date:  2021-09

5.  Treatment outcome differences between pass and fail scores and correlation between cephalometric changes and cast-radiograph evaluation of the American Board of Orthodontics.

Authors:  Siew Peng Neoh; Chulaluk Komoltri; Nita Viwattanatipa
Journal:  J Orthod Sci       Date:  2018-11-15

6.  Orthodontic Treatment Characteristics and Outcomes in an Educational Setting.

Authors:  T Al-Jewair; V Ryan; S Warunek
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2020-04-30

7.  Cephalometric and occlusal changes of Class III malocclusion treated with or without extractions.

Authors:  Roberto Bombonatti; Arón Aliaga-Del Castillo; Juliana Fraga Soares Bombonatti; Daniela Garib; Bryan Tompson; Guilherme Janson
Journal:  Dental Press J Orthod       Date:  2020 Jul-Aug
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.