BACKGROUND: Autosomal dominant facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy (FSHD) is associated with partial deletion of the subtelomeric D4Z4 repeat array on chromosome 4qter. This chromosomal rearrangement may result in regional chromatin relaxation and transcriptional deregulation of genes nearby. METHODS AND RESULTS: Here we describe the isolation and characterisation of FRG2, a member of a chromosomally dispersed gene family, mapping only 37 kb proximal to the D4Z4 repeat array. Homology and motif searches yielded no clues to the function of the predicted protein. FRG2 expression is undetectable in all tissues tested except for differentiating myoblasts of FSHD patients, which display low, yet distinct levels of FRG2 expression, partly from chromosome 4 but predominantly originating from its homologue on chromosome 10. However, in non-FSHD myopathy patients only distantly related FRG2 homologues are transcribed, while differentiating myoblasts from healthy controls fail to express any member of this gene family. Moreover, fibroblasts of FSHD patients and control individuals undergoing forced Ad5-MyoD mediated myogenesis show expression of FRG2 mainly originating from chromosome 10. Luciferase reporter assays show that the FRG2 promoter region can direct high levels of expression but is inhibited by increasing numbers of D4Z4 repeat units. Transient transfection experiments with FRG2 fusion-protein constructs reveal nuclear localisation and apparently FRG2 overexpression causes a wide range of morphological changes. CONCLUSION: The localisation of FRG2 genes close to the D4Z4 repeats on chromosome 4 and 10, their transcriptional upregulation specifically in FSHD myoblast cultures, potential involvement in myogenesis, and promoter properties qualify FRG2 as an attractive candidate for FSHD pathogenesis.
BACKGROUND:Autosomal dominant facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy (FSHD) is associated with partial deletion of the subtelomeric D4Z4 repeat array on chromosome 4qter. This chromosomal rearrangement may result in regional chromatin relaxation and transcriptional deregulation of genes nearby. METHODS AND RESULTS: Here we describe the isolation and characterisation of FRG2, a member of a chromosomally dispersed gene family, mapping only 37 kb proximal to the D4Z4 repeat array. Homology and motif searches yielded no clues to the function of the predicted protein. FRG2 expression is undetectable in all tissues tested except for differentiating myoblasts of FSHDpatients, which display low, yet distinct levels of FRG2 expression, partly from chromosome 4 but predominantly originating from its homologue on chromosome 10. However, in non-FSHDmyopathypatients only distantly related FRG2 homologues are transcribed, while differentiating myoblasts from healthy controls fail to express any member of this gene family. Moreover, fibroblasts of FSHDpatients and control individuals undergoing forced Ad5-MyoD mediated myogenesis show expression of FRG2 mainly originating from chromosome 10. Luciferase reporter assays show that the FRG2 promoter region can direct high levels of expression but is inhibited by increasing numbers of D4Z4 repeat units. Transient transfection experiments with FRG2 fusion-protein constructs reveal nuclear localisation and apparently FRG2 overexpression causes a wide range of morphological changes. CONCLUSION: The localisation of FRG2 genes close to the D4Z4 repeats on chromosome 4 and 10, their transcriptional upregulation specifically in FSHD myoblast cultures, potential involvement in myogenesis, and promoter properties qualify FRG2 as an attractive candidate for FSHD pathogenesis.
Authors: Michel van Geel; Morag C Dickson; Amy F Beck; Daniel J Bolland; Rune R Frants; Silvère M van der Maarel; Pieter J de Jong; Jane E Hewitt Journal: Genomics Date: 2002-02 Impact factor: 5.736
Authors: Sara T Winokur; Yi-Wen Chen; Peter S Masny; Jorge H Martin; Jeffrey T Ehmsen; Stephen J Tapscott; Silvere M van der Maarel; Yukiko Hayashi; Kevin M Flanigan Journal: Hum Mol Genet Date: 2003-09-30 Impact factor: 6.150
Authors: Petra G M van Overveld; Richard J F L Lemmers; Lodewijk A Sandkuijl; Leo Enthoven; Sara T Winokur; Floor Bakels; George W Padberg; Gert-Jan B van Ommen; Rune R Frants; Silvère M van der Maarel Journal: Nat Genet Date: 2003-11-23 Impact factor: 38.330
Authors: R J L F Lemmers; M Osborn; T Haaf; M Rogers; R R Frants; G W Padberg; D N Cooper; S M van der Maarel; M Upadhyaya Journal: Neurology Date: 2003-07-22 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Richard J L F Lemmers; Petra G M Van Overveld; Lodewijk A Sandkuijl; Harry Vrieling; George W Padberg; Rune R Frants; Silvère M van der Maarel Journal: Am J Hum Genet Date: 2004-05-20 Impact factor: 11.025
Authors: Sara T Winokur; Kathy Barrett; Jorge H Martin; James R Forrester; Mariella Simon; Rabi Tawil; Seung-Ah Chung; Peter S Masny; Denise A Figlewicz Journal: Neuromuscul Disord Date: 2003-05 Impact factor: 4.296
Authors: Guanchao Jiang; Fan Yang; Petra G M van Overveld; Vettaikorumakankav Vedanarayanan; Silvere van der Maarel; Melanie Ehrlich Journal: Hum Mol Genet Date: 2003-09-23 Impact factor: 6.150
Authors: Petr Dmitriev; Andrei Petrov; Eugenie Ansseau; Luiza Stankevicins; Sébastien Charron; Elena Kim; Tomas Jan Bos; Thomas Robert; Ahmed Turki; Frédérique Coppée; Alexandra Belayew; Vladimir Lazar; Gilles Carnac; Dalila Laoudj; Marc Lipinski; Yegor S Vassetzky Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 2011-09-21 Impact factor: 5.157
Authors: Andrei Petrov; Iryna Pirozhkova; Gilles Carnac; Dalila Laoudj; Marc Lipinski; Yegor S Vassetzky Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2006-04-21 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Sachiko Homma; Jennifer C J Chen; Fedik Rahimov; Mary Lou Beermann; Kendal Hanger; Genila M Bibat; Kathryn R Wagner; Louis M Kunkel; Charles P Emerson; Jeffrey Boone Miller Journal: Eur J Hum Genet Date: 2011-11-23 Impact factor: 4.246
Authors: Darko Bosnakovski; Zhaohui Xu; Eun Ji Gang; Cristi L Galindo; Mingju Liu; Tugba Simsek; Harold R Garner; Siamak Agha-Mohammadi; Alexandra Tassin; Frédérique Coppée; Alexandra Belayew; Rita R Perlingeiro; Michael Kyba Journal: EMBO J Date: 2008-10-02 Impact factor: 11.598