BACKGROUND: The Brugada syndrome is an arrhythmogenic disease caused in part by mutations in the cardiac sodium channel gene, SCN5A. The electrocardiographic pattern characteristic of the syndrome is dynamic and is often absent in affected individuals. Sodium channel blockers are effective in unmasking carriers of the disease. However, the value of the test remains controversial. METHODS AND RESULTS: We studied 147 individuals representing 4 large families with SCN5A mutations. Of these, 104 were determined to be at possible risk for Brugada syndrome and underwent both electrocardiographic and genetic evaluation. Twenty-four individuals displayed an ECG diagnostic of Brugada syndrome at baseline. Of the remaining, 71 received intravenous ajmaline. Of the 35 genetic carriers who received ajmaline, 28 had a positive test and 7 a negative ajmaline test. The sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of the drug challenge were 80% (28:35), 94.4% (34:36), 93.3% (28:30), and 82.9% (34:41), respectively. Penetrance of the disease phenotype increased from 32.7% to 78.6% with the use of sodium channel blockers. In the absence of ST-segment elevation under baseline conditions, a prolonged P-R interval, but not incomplete right bundle-branch block or early repolarization patterns, indicates a high probability of an SCN5A mutation carrier. CONCLUSIONS: In families with Brugada syndrome, the data suggest that ajmaline testing is valuable in the diagnosis of SCN5A carriers. In the absence of ST-segment elevation at baseline, family members with first-degree atrioventricular block should be suspected of carrying the mutation. An ajmaline test is often the key to making the proper diagnosis in these patients.
BACKGROUND: The Brugada syndrome is an arrhythmogenic disease caused in part by mutations in the cardiac sodium channel gene, SCN5A. The electrocardiographic pattern characteristic of the syndrome is dynamic and is often absent in affected individuals. Sodium channel blockers are effective in unmasking carriers of the disease. However, the value of the test remains controversial. METHODS AND RESULTS: We studied 147 individuals representing 4 large families with SCN5A mutations. Of these, 104 were determined to be at possible risk for Brugada syndrome and underwent both electrocardiographic and genetic evaluation. Twenty-four individuals displayed an ECG diagnostic of Brugada syndrome at baseline. Of the remaining, 71 received intravenous ajmaline. Of the 35 genetic carriers who received ajmaline, 28 had a positive test and 7 a negative ajmaline test. The sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of the drug challenge were 80% (28:35), 94.4% (34:36), 93.3% (28:30), and 82.9% (34:41), respectively. Penetrance of the disease phenotype increased from 32.7% to 78.6% with the use of sodium channel blockers. In the absence of ST-segment elevation under baseline conditions, a prolonged P-R interval, but not incomplete right bundle-branch block or early repolarization patterns, indicates a high probability of an SCN5A mutation carrier. CONCLUSIONS: In families with Brugada syndrome, the data suggest that ajmaline testing is valuable in the diagnosis of SCN5A carriers. In the absence of ST-segment elevation at baseline, family members with first-degree atrioventricular block should be suspected of carrying the mutation. An ajmaline test is often the key to making the proper diagnosis in these patients.
Authors: Arthur A M Wilde; Charles Antzelevitch; Martin Borggrefe; Josep Brugada; Ramón Brugada; Pedro Brugada; Domenico Corrado; Richard N W Hauer; Robert S Kass; Koonlawee Nademanee; Silvia G Priori; Jeffrey A Towbin Journal: Circulation Date: 2002-11-05 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Charles Antzelevitch; Pedro Brugada; Josep Brugada; Ramon Brugada; Jeffrey A Towbin; Kolawanee Nademanee Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2003-05-21 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Jeroen P P Smits; Lars Eckardt; Vincent Probst; Connie R Bezzina; Jean Jacques Schott; Carol Ann Remme; Wilhelm Haverkamp; Günter Breithardt; Denis Escande; Eric Schulze-Bahr; Hervé LeMarec; Arthur A M Wilde Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2002-07-17 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: R Brugada; J Brugada; C Antzelevitch; G E Kirsch; D Potenza; J A Towbin; P Brugada Journal: Circulation Date: 2000-02-08 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: S G Priori; C Napolitano; M Gasparini; C Pappone; P Della Bella; M Brignole; U Giordano; T Giovannini; C Menozzi; R Bloise; L Crotti; L Terreni; P J Schwartz Journal: Circulation Date: 2000-11-14 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: J L Willems; E O Robles de Medina; R Bernard; P Coumel; C Fisch; D Krikler; N A Mazur; F L Meijler; L Mogensen; P Moret Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 1985-06 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Martin K Stiles; Arthur A M Wilde; Dominic J Abrams; Michael J Ackerman; Christine M Albert; Elijah R Behr; Sumeet S Chugh; Martina C Cornel; Karen Gardner; Jodie Ingles; Cynthia A James; Jyh-Ming Jimmy Juang; Stefan Kääb; Elizabeth S Kaufman; Andrew D Krahn; Steven A Lubitz; Heather MacLeod; Carlos A Morillo; Koonlawee Nademanee; Vincent Probst; Elizabeth V Saarel; Luciana Sacilotto; Christopher Semsarian; Mary N Sheppard; Wataru Shimizu; Jonathan R Skinner; Jacob Tfelt-Hansen; Dao Wu Wang Journal: Heart Rhythm Date: 2020-10-19 Impact factor: 6.343