Literature DB >> 15520260

High genetic diversity in the chemoreceptor superfamily of Caenorhabditis elegans.

Mary K Stewart1, Nathaniel L Clark, Gennifer Merrihew, Evan M Galloway, James H Thomas.   

Abstract

We investigated genetic polymorphism in the Caenorhabditis elegans srh and str chemoreceptor gene families, each of which consists of approximately 300 genes encoding seven-pass G-protein-coupled receptors. Almost one-third of the genes in each family are annotated as pseudogenes because of apparent functional defects in N2, the sequenced wild-type strain of C. elegans. More than half of these "pseudogenes" have only one apparent defect, usually a stop codon or deletion. We sequenced the defective region for 31 such genes in 22 wild isolates of C. elegans. For 10 of the 31 genes, we found an apparently functional allele in one or more wild isolates, suggesting that these are not pseudogenes but instead functional genes with a defective allele in N2. We suggest the term "flatliner" to describe genes whose functional vs. pseudogene status is unclear. Investigations of flatliner gene positions, d(N)/d(S) ratios, and phylogenetic trees indicate that they are not readily distinguished from functional genes in N2. We also report striking heterogeneity in the frequency of other polymorphisms among these genes. Finally, the large majority of polymorphism was found in just two strains from geographically isolated islands, Hawaii and Madeira. This suggests that our sampling of wild diversity in C. elegans is narrow and that identification of additional strains from similarly isolated regions will greatly expand the diversity available for study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15520260      PMCID: PMC1449585          DOI: 10.1534/genetics.104.035329

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  26 in total

1.  Updating the str and srj (stl) families of chemoreceptors in Caenorhabditis nematodes reveals frequent gene movement within and between chromosomes.

Authors:  H M Robertson
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 3.160

2.  Population differences in haplotype structure within a human olfactory receptor gene cluster.

Authors:  Idan Menashe; Orna Man; Doron Lancet; Yoav Gilad
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2002-06-01       Impact factor: 6.150

3.  The olfactory receptor gene superfamily of the mouse.

Authors:  Xinmin Zhang; Stuart Firestein
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 24.884

4.  Two large families of chemoreceptor genes in the nematodes Caenorhabditis elegans and Caenorhabditis briggsae reveal extensive gene duplication, diversification, movement, and intron loss.

Authors:  H M Robertson
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 9.043

5.  Likelihood ratio tests for detecting positive selection and application to primate lysozyme evolution.

Authors:  Z Yang
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 16.240

Review 6.  The sense of smell: genomics of vertebrate odorant receptors.

Authors:  Janet M Young; Barbara J Trask
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2002-05-15       Impact factor: 6.150

7.  The complete human olfactory subgenome.

Authors:  G Glusman; I Yanai; I Rubin; D Lancet
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 9.043

8.  Different evolutionary processes shaped the mouse and human olfactory receptor gene families.

Authors:  Janet M Young; Cynthia Friedman; Eleanor M Williams; Joseph A Ross; Lori Tonnes-Priddy; Barbara J Trask
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2002-03-01       Impact factor: 6.150

9.  Different noses for different people.

Authors:  Idan Menashe; Orna Man; Doron Lancet; Yoav Gilad
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 38.330

10.  The human olfactory receptor repertoire.

Authors:  S Zozulya; F Echeverri; T Nguyen
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2001-06-01       Impact factor: 13.583

View more
  23 in total

1.  Intraspecific evolution of the intercellular signaling network underlying a robust developmental system.

Authors:  Josselin Milloz; Fabien Duveau; Isabelle Nuez; Marie-Anne Félix
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2008-11-01       Impact factor: 11.361

2.  The chemoreceptor superfamily in the honey bee, Apis mellifera: expansion of the odorant, but not gustatory, receptor family.

Authors:  Hugh M Robertson; Kevin W Wanner
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2006-10-25       Impact factor: 9.043

3.  Nucleotide polymorphism and linkage disequilibrium in wild populations of the partial selfer Caenorhabditis elegans.

Authors:  Asher D Cutter
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2005-11-04       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Efficient high-resolution deletion discovery in Caenorhabditis elegans by array comparative genomic hybridization.

Authors:  Jason S Maydan; Stephane Flibotte; Mark L Edgley; Joanne Lau; Rebecca R Selzer; Todd A Richmond; Nathan J Pofahl; James H Thomas; Donald G Moerman
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2007-01-31       Impact factor: 9.043

5.  Candidate chemoreceptor subfamilies differentially expressed in the chemosensory organs of the mollusc Aplysia.

Authors:  Scott F Cummins; Dirk Erpenbeck; Zhihua Zou; Charles Claudianos; Leonid L Moroz; Gregg T Nagle; Bernard M Degnan
Journal:  BMC Biol       Date:  2009-06-04       Impact factor: 7.431

6.  Cis-regulatory mechanisms of gene expression in an olfactory neuron type in Caenorhabditis elegans.

Authors:  Eva B Nokes; Alexander M Van Der Linden; Caron Winslow; Saikat Mukhopadhyay; Kristin Ma; Piali Sengupta
Journal:  Dev Dyn       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.780

7.  Patterns of molecular evolution in Caenorhabditis preclude ancient origins of selfing.

Authors:  Asher D Cutter; James D Wasmuth; Nicole L Washington
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Molecular characterization of the Aedes aegypti odorant receptor gene family.

Authors:  J Bohbot; R J Pitts; H-W Kwon; M Rützler; H M Robertson; L J Zwiebel
Journal:  Insect Mol Biol       Date:  2007-07-17       Impact factor: 3.585

9.  Copy number variation in the genomes of twelve natural isolates of Caenorhabditis elegans.

Authors:  Jason S Maydan; Adam Lorch; Mark L Edgley; Stephane Flibotte; Donald G Moerman
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2010-01-25       Impact factor: 3.969

10.  Evolution of a polymodal sensory response network.

Authors:  Jagan Srinivasan; Omer Durak; Paul W Sternberg
Journal:  BMC Biol       Date:  2008-12-15       Impact factor: 7.431

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.