Literature DB >> 15520253

Mouse inbred strain sequence information and yin-yang crosses for quantitative trait locus fine mapping.

Sagiv Shifman1, Ariel Darvasi.   

Abstract

The shared ancestry of mouse inbred strains, together with the availability of sequence and phenotype information, is a resource that can be used to map quantitative trait loci (QTL). The difficulty in using only sequence information lies in the fact that in most instances the allelic state of the QTL cannot be unambiguously determined in a given strain. To overcome this difficulty, the performance of multiple crosses between various inbred strains has been proposed. Here we suggest and evaluate a general approach, which consists of crossing the two strains used initially to map the QTL and any new strain. We have termed these crosses "yin-yang," because they are complementary in nature as shown by the fact that the QTL will necessarily segregate in only one of the crosses. We used the publicly available SNP database of chromosome 16 to evaluate the mapping resolution achievable through this approach. Although on average the improvement of mapping resolution using only four inbred strains was relatively small (i.e., reduction of the QTL-containing interval by half at most), we found a great degree of variability among different regions of chromosome 16 with regard to mapping resolution. This suggests that with a large number of strains in hand, selecting a small number of strains may provide a significant contribution to the fine mapping of QTL.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15520253      PMCID: PMC1449093          DOI: 10.1534/genetics.104.032474

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  15 in total

1.  In silico mapping of mouse quantitative trait loci.

Authors:  E J Chesler; S L Rodriguez-Zas; J S Mogil
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-12-21       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  In silico mapping of mouse quantitative trait loci.

Authors:  A Darvasi
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-12-21       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Comparative sequence analysis in eight inbred strains of the metastasis modifier QTL candidate gene Brms1.

Authors:  Yeong-Gwan Park; Luanne Lukes; Howard Yang; Michael T Debies; Rajeev S Samant; Danny R Welch; Maxwell Lee; Kent W Hunter
Journal:  Mamm Genome       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 2.957

4.  A strategy for the integration of QTL, gene expression, and sequence analyses.

Authors:  Robert Hitzemann; Barry Malmanger; Cheryl Reed; Maureen Lawler; Barbara Hitzemann; Shannon Coulombe; Kari Buck; Brooks Rademacher; Nicole Walter; Yekatrina Polyakov; James Sikela; Brenda Gensler; Sonya Burgers; Robert W Williams; Ken Manly; Jonathan Flint; Christopher Talbot
Journal:  Mamm Genome       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 2.957

Review 5.  Finding genes that underlie complex traits.

Authors:  Anne M Glazier; Joseph H Nadeau; Timothy J Aitman
Journal:  Science       Date:  2002-12-20       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Experimental strategies for the genetic dissection of complex traits in animal models.

Authors:  A Darvasi
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 38.330

7.  Interval-specific congenic strains (ISCS): an experimental design for mapping a QTL into a 1-centimorgan interval.

Authors:  A Darvasi
Journal:  Mamm Genome       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 2.957

8.  Advanced intercross lines, an experimental population for fine genetic mapping.

Authors:  A Darvasi; M Soller
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Genome-wide single-nucleotide polymorphism analysis defines haplotype patterns in mouse.

Authors:  Tim Wiltshire; Mathew T Pletcher; Serge Batalov; S Whitney Barnes; Lisa M Tarantino; Michael P Cooke; Hua Wu; Kevin Smylie; Andrey Santrosyan; Neal G Copeland; Nancy A Jenkins; Francis Kalush; Richard J Mural; Richard J Glynne; Steve A Kay; Mark D Adams; Colin F Fletcher
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-02-28       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Type I and type II error rates for quantitative trait loci (QTL) mapping studies using recombinant inbred mouse strains.

Authors:  J K Belknap; S R Mitchell; L A O'Toole; M L Helms; J C Crabbe
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 2.805

View more
  7 in total

1.  Use of contiguous congenic strains in analyzing compound QTLs.

Authors:  John P Rapp; Bina Joe
Journal:  Physiol Genomics       Date:  2011-11-22       Impact factor: 3.107

2.  Genetic design and statistical power of nested association mapping in maize.

Authors:  Jianming Yu; James B Holland; Michael D McMullen; Edward S Buckler
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  An integrated in silico gene mapping strategy in inbred mice.

Authors:  Alessandra C L Cervino; Ariel Darvasi; Mohammad Fallahi; Christopher C Mader; Nicholas F Tsinoremas
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2006-10-08       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  A comprehensive mouse IBD database for the efficient localization of quantitative trait loci.

Authors:  Alessandra C L Cervino; Mark Gosink; Mohammad Fallahi; Bruce Pascal; Christopher Mader; Nicholas F Tsinoremas
Journal:  Mamm Genome       Date:  2006-06-12       Impact factor: 2.957

Review 5.  Identifying novel genes for atherosclerosis through mouse-human comparative genetics.

Authors:  Xiaosong Wang; Naoki Ishimori; Ron Korstanje; Jarod Rollins; Beverly Paigen
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2005-05-19       Impact factor: 11.025

6.  Multiple genes on chromosome 7 regulate dopaminergic amacrine cell number in the mouse retina.

Authors:  Irene E Whitney; Mary A Raven; Daniel C Ciobanu; Robert W Williams; Benjamin E Reese
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2009-01-24       Impact factor: 4.799

Review 7.  Accelerating discovery for complex neurological and behavioral disorders through systems genetics and integrative genomics in the laboratory mouse.

Authors:  Jason A Bubier; Elissa J Chesler
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 7.620

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.