Literature DB >> 15520032

The impact of matching the patient's vocabulary: a randomized control trial.

Nigel Williams1, Jane Ogden.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Research in general practice emphasizes the importance of matched models, beliefs and vocabulary in the consultation.
OBJECTIVE: The present study aimed to explore the impact of matched and unmatched vocabulary on patient satisfaction with consultations.
METHODS: The study took place in one inner city general practice. Patients (n=62) were randomized to either matched or unmatched vocabulary consultations when consulting for problems relating to sexual or bodily function or anatomy. Matched consultations required the doctor to use the same vocabulary as the patient. Unmatched consultations required the doctor to use medical vocabulary. Completed questionnaires were received from 60 patients. The main outcome measure was patient satisfaction (using the Medical Interview Satisfaction Scale). This assesses total satisfaction and has four subscales: distress relief; communication comfort; rapport; and compliance intent. Doctor satisfaction with the consultation was also assessed.
RESULTS: The results showed that the two groups were comparable for demographic variables and doctor satisfaction. However, patients in the matched consultation group had significantly higher total satisfaction scores and higher ratings of rapport, communication comfort, distress relief and compliance intent than those in the unmatched group.
CONCLUSION: The results indicate that a doctor's choice of vocabulary affects patient satisfaction immediately after a general practice consultation and that using the same vocabulary as the patient can improve patient outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15520032     DOI: 10.1093/fampra/cmh610

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fam Pract        ISSN: 0263-2136            Impact factor:   2.267


  16 in total

1.  Exploring and developing consumer health vocabularies.

Authors:  Qing T Zeng; Tony Tse
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2005-10-12       Impact factor: 4.497

2.  Nursery, gutter, or anatomy class? Obscene expression in consumer health.

Authors:  Catherine Arnott Smith
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2007-10-11

3.  Patients' misunderstanding of common orthopaedic terminology: the need for clarity.

Authors:  C H M Bagley; A R Hunter; I A Bacarese-Hamilton
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 1.891

4.  Community health education at student-run clinics leads to sustained improvement in patients' hepatitis B knowledge.

Authors:  David Ouyang; Neal Yuan; Leslie Sheu; Gary Lau; Cheng Chen; Cindy J Lai
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2013-06

5.  The development of the DSM-5 Cultural Formulation Interview-Fidelity Instrument (CFI-FI): a pilot study.

Authors:  Neil Krishan Aggarwal; Andrew Glass; Amilcar Tirado; Marit Boiler; Andel Nicasio; Margarita Alegría; Melanie Wall; Roberto Lewis-Fernández
Journal:  J Health Care Poor Underserved       Date:  2014-08

6.  Does the Cultural Formulation Interview for the fifth revision of the diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (DSM-5) affect medical communication? A qualitative exploratory study from the New York site.

Authors:  Neil K Aggarwal; Ravi Desilva; Andel V Nicasio; Marit Boiler; Roberto Lewis-Fernández
Journal:  Ethn Health       Date:  2013-11-15       Impact factor: 2.772

7.  Complexity of GPs' explanations about mental health problems: development, reliability, and validity of a measure.

Authors:  John Cape; Elena Morris; Mary Burd; Marta Buszewicz
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 5.386

Review 8.  [Interactive augmented reality systems : Aid for personalized patient education and rehabilitation].

Authors:  F Bork
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 1.000

9.  Assessing oral literacy demand in genetic counseling dialogue: preliminary test of a conceptual framework.

Authors:  Debra L Roter; Lori H Erby; Susan Larson; Lee Ellington
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2007-07-05       Impact factor: 4.634

10.  How accurate is patients' anatomical knowledge: a cross-sectional, questionnaire study of six patient groups and a general public sample.

Authors:  John Weinman; Gibran Yusuf; Robert Berks; Sam Rayner; Keith J Petrie
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2009-06-12       Impact factor: 2.497

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.