Literature DB >> 15518835

Treatment of multilevel cervical fusion with cages.

Der-Yang Cho1, Wen-Yen Lee, Pon-Chun Sheu.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Multilevel cervical discectomy usually requires plate and screw fixation for maintaining the spinal curvature, and increasing the graft fusion rate. However, the use of plate and screw fixation may cause a few complications, such as screw breakage, screw pullout, esophagus perforation, and cord or nerve root injury. In this study, we try to use cages to replace plate function in multilevel cervical fusion.
METHODS: From January 1997 to June 2001, there were 180 consecutive cases of multilevel cervical degenerative disease. We randomized them into three groups: Group A (60 patients) underwent anterior discectomy and polyetheretherketone (PEEK) fusion, Group B (50 patients) underwent anterior discectomy, autogenous iliac crest graft (AICG) fusion and plate fixation, and Group C (70 patients) underwent anterior discectomy and AICG only. X-ray of cervical spine was taken every 3 months until fusion was complete. Spinal curvature was measured by lateral view of X-ray. The functional and working status were evaluated by Prolo scale. Blood loss and operation time were recorded, respectively.
RESULTS: The total complication rates were 3.3%, 16%, and 54.3% in Groups A, B, and C respectively. The graft complications were evaluated by radiographic findings (graft collapse, nonunion, or dislodged graft). However, only 37.1% of patients (13/35) with graft complications had clinical symptoms (severe neck pain, radicular pain, or neurologic deficits). The fusion rate was better, and the time to fusion was sooner in Groups A and B than Group C, p < 0.001 (chi(2) test). PEEK cage is statistically better than plating group in total complications, p < 0.05. Graft collapse and nonunion were the major graft complications in Group C (AICG without plating). Screw pullout, and screw breakage were the main causes of plating complication. Blood loss was minimum in Group A, p < 0.05. Spinal lordosis increased by a mean of 4.61 +/- 2.93 mm and 1.68 +/- 5.02 mm in Groups A and B, respectively, but spinal kyphosis increased by a mean of -2.09 +/- 4.77 mm in Group C. Group A had a statistically better Prolo scale than Group C, p < 0.0001.
CONCLUSIONS: Both PEEK cage without plating and AICG with plating are good methods for interbody fusion in multilevel cervical degenerative diseases. They increase spinal lordosis and graft fusion rate, and cause fewer surgical complications. However, PEEK cage is preferred in our study for multilevel fusion, because it has the fewest complication rates and the least amount of blood loss.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15518835     DOI: 10.1016/j.surneu.2004.01.021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Neurol        ISSN: 0090-3019


  26 in total

1.  ACDF Using the Solis Cage with Iliac Bone Graft in Single Level: Clinical and Radiological Outcomes in Average 36 months Follow-up.

Authors:  Si-Hyuck Oh; Kyeong-Wook Yoon; Young-Jin Kim; Sang-Koo Lee
Journal:  Korean J Spine       Date:  2013-06-30

2.  Four-level anterior cervical discectomies and cage-augmented fusion with and without fixation.

Authors:  Mootaz Shousha; Ali Ezzati; Heinrich Boehm
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-07-20       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  A prospective randomized trial comparing anterior cervical discectomy and fusion versus plate-only open-door laminoplasty for the treatment of spinal stenosis in degenerative diseases.

Authors:  Yun-Qi Jiang; Xi-Lei Li; Xiao-Gang Zhou; Chong Bian; Han-Ming Wang; Jian-Ming Huang; Jian Dong
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-11-24       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Plate augmentation in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with cage for degenerative cervical spinal disorders.

Authors:  Kyung-Jin Song; Cyrus E Taghavi; Margaret S Hsu; Kwang-Bok Lee; Gyu-Hyung Kim; Ji-Hoon Song
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-02-21       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Efficacy of PEEK cages and plate augmentation in three-level anterior cervical fusion of elderly patients.

Authors:  Kyung Jin Song; Gyu Hyung Kim; Byeong Yeol Choi
Journal:  Clin Orthop Surg       Date:  2011-02-15

6.  Comparison of fusion with cage alone and plate instrumentation in two-level cervical degenerative disease.

Authors:  Yong-Hun Joo; Jong-Won Lee; Ki-Young Kwon; Jong-Joo Rhee; Hyun-Koo Lee
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2010-10-30

7.  Anterior cervical discectomy with fusion in patients with cervical disc degeneration: a prospective outcome study of 258 patients (181 fused with autologous bone graft and 77 fused with a PEEK cage).

Authors:  Bjarne Lied; Paal Andre Roenning; Jarle Sundseth; Eirik Helseth
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2010-03-21       Impact factor: 2.102

8.  Using the modified Delphi method to establish a new Chinese clinical consensus of the treatments for cervical radiculopathy.

Authors:  Lei Zang; Ning Fan; Yong Hai; S B Lu; Q J Su; J C Yang; Peng Du; Y J Gao
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-03-10       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Two-level contiguous cervical disc disease treated with peek cages packed with demineralized bone matrix: results of 3-year follow-up.

Authors:  Kivanç Topuz; Ahmet Colak; Serdar Kaya; Hakan Simşek; Murat Kutlay; Mehmet Nusret Demircan; Murat Velioğlu
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-01-08       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) autograft versus graft substitutes: what do patients prefer?-A clinical study.

Authors:  Monish M Maharaj; Kevin Phan; Ralph J Mobbs
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2016-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.