UNLABELLED: Any attempt to improve organ donation would be of benefit due to the growing shortage of cadaveric sources for transplantation. OBJECTIVE: We compared the graft survivals and possible predictive variables among renal transplant recipients with organs from living unrelated (LURD) versus cadaveric donors (CD). METHOD: Among 104 consecutive renal transplants performed from July 1992 to February 2003, 41 were from LURD and 24 from CD. Immunosuppressive regimens were based on cyclosporine and steroids with mycophenolate mofetil added after 1998. Patient and graft survivals were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using log-rank tests. The significance level of predictive variables was analyzed with the Cox proportional hazard model. The follow-up period was 2 to 127 months (median 46 months). RESULTS: Eight recipients lost their grafts (six from LURD and two from CD) due to four chronic rejections, one acute rejection, one recurrence of primary disease, and one death with a functioning graft. The graft survival rates at 1, 3, 5, and 7 years were 97.6%, 91.9%, 88.5%, and 82.2% for LURD transplants versus 95.5%, 90.9%, 90.9%, and 90.9% for CD transplants, respectively (P > .05). Delayed graft function and donor age (>55 years old) were statistically significant predictors of graft survival among LURD transplants. Donor age (>55 years old) and multiple preoperative transfusion history were significant in CD transplants. CONCLUSION: LURD transplant survival was similar to that of CD transplants in our series. LURDs are an excellent source of organs to expand the donor pool.
UNLABELLED: Any attempt to improve organ donation would be of benefit due to the growing shortage of cadaveric sources for transplantation. OBJECTIVE: We compared the graft survivals and possible predictive variables among renal transplant recipients with organs from living unrelated (LURD) versus cadaveric donors (CD). METHOD: Among 104 consecutive renal transplants performed from July 1992 to February 2003, 41 were from LURD and 24 from CD. Immunosuppressive regimens were based on cyclosporine and steroids with mycophenolate mofetil added after 1998. Patient and graft survivals were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using log-rank tests. The significance level of predictive variables was analyzed with the Cox proportional hazard model. The follow-up period was 2 to 127 months (median 46 months). RESULTS: Eight recipients lost their grafts (six from LURD and two from CD) due to four chronic rejections, one acute rejection, one recurrence of primary disease, and one death with a functioning graft. The graft survival rates at 1, 3, 5, and 7 years were 97.6%, 91.9%, 88.5%, and 82.2% for LURD transplants versus 95.5%, 90.9%, 90.9%, and 90.9% for CD transplants, respectively (P > .05). Delayed graft function and donor age (>55 years old) were statistically significant predictors of graft survival among LURD transplants. Donor age (>55 years old) and multiple preoperative transfusion history were significant in CD transplants. CONCLUSION: LURD transplant survival was similar to that of CD transplants in our series. LURDs are an excellent source of organs to expand the donor pool.
Authors: Ulf Kulik; Jill Gwiasda; Felix Oldhafer; Alexander Kaltenborn; Viktor Arelin; Faikah Gueler; Nicolas Richter; Juergen Klempnauer; Harald Schrem Journal: Int Urol Nephrol Date: 2017-08-21 Impact factor: 2.370