Literature DB >> 15517750

Evaluation of SurePress Comfort: a new compression system for the management of venous leg ulcers.

R Polignano1, G Guarnera, P Bonadeo.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The primary aim was to compare the healing of venous leg ulcers after management with either a new compression stocking (SurePress Comfort, ConvaTec) or a standard short-stretch bandage system (Comprilan, BSN Medical GmbH & Co). Secondary parameters included healing rate, ease of application and removal, comfort during wear, local pain levels and concordance.
METHOD: This was a prospective multicentre open-label comparative randomised controlled parallel-group pilot trial of 12 weeks' duration.
RESULTS: The proportion of ulcers that healed in 12 weeks (44.4% versus 17.2%, p=0.027) and the average time to healing (72 +/- 5 days versus 101 +/- 7 days, p=0.0265) were significantly better with SurePress Comfort than the comparator. All the secondary parameters (except concordance) also showed statistically significant differences for the stocking over the comparator.
CONCLUSION: SurePress Comfort stocking system is more effective than a standard short-stretch compression bandage in healing venous leg ulcers and in reducing associated pain. It is well accepted by patients due to its ease of use and comfort, and its safety profile is comparable to that of a standard compression system. It may therefore provide an effective solution for the delivery of graduated compression and has the potential to improve concordance, compared with short- stretch bandages. DECLARATION OF INTEREST: This study was sponsored by ConvaTec.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15517750     DOI: 10.12968/jowc.2004.13.9.26703

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Wound Care        ISSN: 0969-0700            Impact factor:   2.072


  7 in total

1.  The effectiveness of a four-layer compression bandage system in comparison with Class 3 compression hosiery on healing and quality of life in patients with venous leg ulcers: a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Kathleen J Finlayson; Mary D Courtney; Michelle A Gibb; Jane A O'Brien; Christina N Parker; Helen E Edwards
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2012-06-21       Impact factor: 3.315

Review 2.  Compression for preventing recurrence of venous ulcers.

Authors:  E Andrea Nelson; Sally E M Bell-Syer
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2014-09-09

Review 3.  Management of Lower Extremity Pain from Chronic Venous Insufficiency: A Comprehensive Review.

Authors:  Vwaire Orhurhu; Robert Chu; Katherine Xie; Ghislain N Kamanyi; Bisola Salisu; Mariam Salisu-Orhurhu; Ivan Urits; Rachel J Kaye; Jamal Hasoon; Omar Viswanath; Aaron J Kaye; Jay Karri; Zwade Marshall; Alan D Kaye; Dua Anahita
Journal:  Cardiol Ther       Date:  2021-03-11

4.  Venous ulcer review.

Authors:  Paul Bevis; Jonothan Earnshaw
Journal:  Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol       Date:  2011-03-03

Review 5.  Compression for venous leg ulcers.

Authors:  Susan O'Meara; Nicky Cullum; E Andrea Nelson; Jo C Dumville
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2012-11-14

6.  Compression bandages or stockings versus no compression for treating venous leg ulcers.

Authors:  Chunhu Shi; Jo C Dumville; Nicky Cullum; Emma Connaughton; Gill Norman
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-07-26

Review 7.  Publicly Reported Wound Healing Rates: The Fantasy and the Reality.

Authors:  Caroline E Fife; Kristen A Eckert; Marissa J Carter
Journal:  Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle)       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 4.730

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.