Literature DB >> 15517298

[The role of utilities in economic evaluations of healthcare interventions-an introduction].

A Maetzel1.   

Abstract

Assessment of strength of preference values (utilities) for patients' own health, or disease states from a societal perspective, is an essential element to economic evaluations of healthcare interventions. This review provides an overview of the different methods used to directly elicit strength of preference values: the standard gamble, time trade-off and rating scale methods. Methods used to derive utilities for patients' health states indirectly, and from a societal perspective are described. Three commonly used questionnaires: Health Utilities Index 3, EQ-5D and SF-6D are briefly commented upon. We also discuss the usefulness of utilities and advantages and disadvantages to be considered when choosing direct or indirect utility elicitation methods.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15517298     DOI: 10.1007/s00393-004-0658-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Z Rheumatol        ISSN: 0340-1855            Impact factor:   1.372


  9 in total

1.  The estimation of a preference-based measure of health from the SF-36.

Authors:  John Brazier; Jennifer Roberts; Mark Deverill
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 3.883

Review 2.  The Health Utilities Index (HUI) system for assessing health-related quality of life in clinical studies.

Authors:  W J Furlong; D H Feeny; G W Torrance; R D Barr
Journal:  Ann Med       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 4.709

3.  EuroQol--a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life.

Authors: 
Journal:  Health Policy       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 2.980

4.  Utilities and preferences for health states: time for a pragmatic approach?

Authors:  C D Naylor; H A Llewellyn-Thomas
Journal:  J Health Serv Res Policy       Date:  1998-07

Review 5.  A comparative review of four preference-weighted measures of health-related quality of life.

Authors:  Jacek A Kopec; Kevin D Willison
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 6.437

6.  Utilities and quality-adjusted life years.

Authors:  G W Torrance; D Feeny
Journal:  Int J Technol Assess Health Care       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 2.188

7.  Deriving a preference-based single index from the UK SF-36 Health Survey.

Authors:  J Brazier; T Usherwood; R Harper; K Thomas
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 6.437

8.  A utility maximization model for evaluation of health care programs.

Authors:  G W Torrance; W H Thomas; D L Sackett
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1972       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 9.  Cost utility analysis: what should be measured?

Authors:  J Richardson
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 4.634

  9 in total
  1 in total

1.  Additive effect of tDCS combined with Peripheral Electrical Stimulation to an exercise program in pain control in knee osteoarthritis: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Cleber Luz-Santos; Janine Ribeiro Camatti; Alaí Barbosa Paixão; Katia Nunes Sá; Pedro Montoya; Michael Lee; Abrahão Fontes Baptista
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2017-12-21       Impact factor: 2.279

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.