Literature DB >> 15515027

Comment: a biological guide for electromagnetic safety: the stress response.

Martin Blank1, Reba Goodman.   

Abstract

Questions of safety of electromagnetic (EM) fields should be based on relevant biological properties, i.e., specific cellular reactions to potentially harmful stimuli. The stress response is a well documented protective reaction of plant and animal cells to a variety of environmental threats, and it is stimulated by both extremely low frequency (ELF) and radio frequency (RF) EM fields. It involves activation of DNA to initiate synthesis of stress proteins. Thermal and non-thermal stimuli affect different segments of DNA and utilize different biochemical pathways. However, both ELF and RF stimulate the same non-thermal pathway. Since the same biochemical reactions are stimulated in different frequency ranges with very different specific absorption rates (SARs), SAR level is not a valid basis for safety standards. Studies of EM field interactions with DNA and with model systems provide insight into a plausible mechanism that can be effective in ELF and RF ranges.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15515027     DOI: 10.1002/bem.20061

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bioelectromagnetics        ISSN: 0197-8462            Impact factor:   2.010


  4 in total

1.  Microwave irradiation affects gene expression in plants.

Authors:  A Vian; D Roux; S Girard; P Bonnet; F Paladian; E Davies; G Ledoigt
Journal:  Plant Signal Behav       Date:  2006-03

2.  Microwaves from Mobile Phones Inhibit 53BP1 Focus Formation in Human Stem Cells More Strongly Than in Differentiated Cells: Possible Mechanistic Link to Cancer Risk.

Authors:  Eva Markovà; Lars O G Malmgren; Igor Y Belyaev
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2009-10-23       Impact factor: 9.031

3.  Dirty electricity elevates blood sugar among electrically sensitive diabetics and may explain brittle diabetes.

Authors:  Magda Havas
Journal:  Electromagn Biol Med       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 2.882

4.  Efficiency of Magnetostatic Protection Using Nanostructured Permalloy Shielding Coatings Depending on Their Microstructure.

Authors:  Tatiana Zubar; Sergey Grabchikov; Anna Kotelnikova; Egor Kaniukov; Maksim Kutuzau; Karin Leistner; Kornelius Nielsch; Tatiana Vershinina; Daria Tishkevich; Oleg Kanafyev; Artem Kozlovskiy; Maxim Zdorovets; Valery Fedosyuk; Alex Trukhanov
Journal:  Nanomaterials (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-04       Impact factor: 5.076

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.