PURPOSE: To prospectively determine the maximum-tolerated dose of accelerated hyperfractionated conformal radiotherapy (RT; 1.6 Gy bid) for unresectable locally advanced lung cancer (IIB to IIIA/B) following induction carboplatin/paclitaxel (C/T) or carboplatin/vinorelbine (C/N). METHODS: Induction chemotherapy, C/T or C/N, was followed by escalating doses of conformally-planned RT (73.6 to 86.4 Gy in 6.4-Gy increments). Concurrent boost methods delivered 1.6 and 1.25 Gy bid to the gross and clinical target volumes, respectively. RESULTS: Between November 1997 and February 2002, 44 patients were enrolled (median age, 59 years; 59% male; stage III, 98%; median tumor size, 4 cm). Thirty-nine patients completed induction chemotherapy: 19 had a partial response, seven progressed, 15 had no response, and three were not assessable. Chemotherapy-associated toxicities were similar in the two chemotherapy groups. The incidence of grade > or = 3 RT-induced toxicity was 1/13, 2/14, and 4/12 at 73.6, 80, and 86.4 Gy, respectively, thus defining the maximum tolerated dose at approximately 80 Gy. Toxicities were in both lung and esophagus and were similar in the two chemotherapy arms. With a median followup of 34 months in the survivors, the actuarial 2-year survival was 47%, the median survival was 18 months. Fifteen patients had tumor relapse: 5 local failures in the high-dose volume, 2 regional failures outside of the high-dose volume, and 8 distant metastases. CONCLUSION: High-dose conformal twice-daily radiation therapy to approximately 80 Gy appears tolerable in well-selected patients with unresectable lung cancer following either C/T or C/N. Dose-limiting toxicities are mainly pulmonary and esophageal.
PURPOSE: To prospectively determine the maximum-tolerated dose of accelerated hyperfractionated conformal radiotherapy (RT; 1.6 Gy bid) for unresectable locally advanced lung cancer (IIB to IIIA/B) following induction carboplatin/paclitaxel (C/T) or carboplatin/vinorelbine (C/N). METHODS: Induction chemotherapy, C/T or C/N, was followed by escalating doses of conformally-planned RT (73.6 to 86.4 Gy in 6.4-Gy increments). Concurrent boost methods delivered 1.6 and 1.25 Gy bid to the gross and clinical target volumes, respectively. RESULTS: Between November 1997 and February 2002, 44 patients were enrolled (median age, 59 years; 59% male; stage III, 98%; median tumor size, 4 cm). Thirty-nine patients completed induction chemotherapy: 19 had a partial response, seven progressed, 15 had no response, and three were not assessable. Chemotherapy-associated toxicities were similar in the two chemotherapy groups. The incidence of grade > or = 3 RT-induced toxicitywas 1/13, 2/14, and 4/12 at 73.6, 80, and 86.4 Gy, respectively, thus defining the maximum tolerated dose at approximately 80 Gy. Toxicities were in both lung and esophagus and were similar in the two chemotherapy arms. With a median followup of 34 months in the survivors, the actuarial 2-year survival was 47%, the median survival was 18 months. Fifteen patients had tumor relapse: 5 local failures in the high-dose volume, 2 regional failures outside of the high-dose volume, and 8 distant metastases. CONCLUSION: High-dose conformal twice-daily radiation therapy to approximately 80 Gy appears tolerable in well-selected patients with unresectable lung cancer following either C/T or C/N. Dose-limiting toxicities are mainly pulmonary and esophageal.
Authors: Jingfang Mao; Zafer Kocak; Sumin Zhou; Jennifer Garst; Elizabeth S Evans; Junan Zhang; Nicole A Larrier; Donna R Hollis; Rodney J Folz; Lawrence B Marks Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2007-02-02 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Joseph K Salama; Thomas E Stinchcombe; Lin Gu; Xiaofei Wang; Karen Morano; Jeffrey A Bogart; Jeffrey C Crawford; Mark A Socinski; A William Blackstock; Everett E Vokes Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2011-04-07 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Kyle Wang; Kevin A Pearlstein; Nicholas D Patchett; Allison M Deal; Panayiotis Mavroidis; Brian C Jensen; Matthew B Lipner; Timothy M Zagar; Yue Wang; Carrie B Lee; Michael J Eblan; Julian G Rosenman; Mark A Socinski; Thomas E Stinchcombe; Lawrence B Marks Journal: Radiother Oncol Date: 2017-10-16 Impact factor: 6.280
Authors: Kyle Wang; Michael J Eblan; Allison M Deal; Matthew Lipner; Timothy M Zagar; Yue Wang; Panayiotis Mavroidis; Carrie B Lee; Brian C Jensen; Julian G Rosenman; Mark A Socinski; Thomas E Stinchcombe; Lawrence B Marks Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2017-01-23 Impact factor: 50.717
Authors: René W M Underberg; John R van Sörnsen de Koste; Frank J Lagerwaard; Andrew Vincent; Ben J Slotman; Suresh Senan Journal: Radiat Oncol Date: 2006-03-31 Impact factor: 3.481