Literature DB >> 15514173

Favorable early outcome of carotid artery stenting without protection devices.

László K Sztriha1, Erika Vörös, Katalin Sas, Réka Szentgyörgyi, Anna Pócsik, Pál Barzó, Péter Szikra, Attila Makai, Alex Szólics, Péter Elek, László Rudas, László Vécsei.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: Protection devices are increasingly used in carotid artery stenting. However, no randomized trial has been conducted to evaluate the efficacy of such devices, and arguments have also been formulated against their routine use. We set out to investigate the complication rates associated with carotid artery stenting performed without protection devices. Applicability of covered stents in the carotid system was also evaluated.
METHODS: Between January 2001 and July 2003, 245 consecutive patients (260 hemispheres) underwent carotid artery stenting. No protection devices were applied. Covered stents were implanted in 31 (12.1%) cases. The incidence of complications during the intervention and the subsequent 30-day follow-up period was recorded.
RESULTS: The technical success rate was 98.8%. One postprocedural nonneurological death (0.4%) occurred. Neurological complications (inclusive of transient ischemic attacks) were observed in 14 cases (5.4%). The rate of major complications (death, major stroke, and myocardial infarction) was 1.6% among the symptomatic and 1.5% among the asymptomatic cases. The rate of minor strokes was 3.2% in the symptomatic and 1.5% in the asymptomatic group. Of the neurological complications, 64.3% occurred postprocedurally. No ipsilateral neurological complications were detected in the subgroup treated with covered stents.
CONCLUSIONS: Carotid artery stenting without protection devices appears to be safe. Most of the neurological complications could not have been prevented with protection devices, because they occurred after the intervention. The application of covered stents may reduce the rate of embolization-related complications in the periprocedural period.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15514173     DOI: 10.1161/01.STR.0000147714.19871.45

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stroke        ISSN: 0039-2499            Impact factor:   7.914


  5 in total

1.  Diffusion-weighted MR imaging lesions after filter-protected stenting of high-grade symptomatic carotid artery stenoses.

Authors:  R du Mesnil de Rochemont; S Schneider; B Yan; A Lehr; M Sitzer; J Berkefeld
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2006 Jun-Jul       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  A rare complication of carotid artery stenting: displacement of marker ring causing locking of stent and incomplete stent expansion.

Authors:  E Akgul; E H Aksungur; K Korur; K Aikimbaev; H Yaliniz
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 3.825

3.  Carotid intervention 3: the evidence for cerebral protection.

Authors:  Fabrizio Fanelli; Mario Bezzi; Emanuele Boatta; Roberto Passariello
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 1.513

4.  The use of covered stents for the endovascular treatment of extracranial internal carotid artery stenosis: a prospective study with a 5-year follow-up.

Authors:  Alex Szólics; László K Sztriha; Péter Szikra; Miklós Szólics; András Palkó; Erika Vörös
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2009-12-22       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Cerebral ischemia detected with diffusion-weighted MR imaging after protected carotid artery stenting: comparison of distal balloon and filter device.

Authors:  Suk Jung Kim; Hong Gee Roh; Pyoung Jeon; Keon Ha Kim; Kwang Ho Lee; Hong Sik Byun; Won Jin Moon; Gyeong Moon Kim; Young Wook Kim; Dong Ik Kim
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2007 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.500

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.