Literature DB >> 15513694

Can greater muscularity in larger individuals resolve the 3/4 power-law controversy when modelling maximum oxygen uptake?

A M Nevill1, G Markovic, V Vucetic, R Holder.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The power function relationship, MR = a.m(b), between metabolic rate (MR) and body mass m has been the source of much controversy amongst biologists for many years. Various studies have reported mass exponents (b) greater than the anticipated 'surface-area' exponent 0.67, often closer to 0.75 originally identified by Kleiber. AIM: The study aimed to provide a biological explanation for these 'inflated' exponents when modelling maximum oxygen uptake (max), based on the observations from this and previous studies that larger individuals develop disproportionately more muscle mass in the arms and legs. RESEARCH DESIGN AND
SUBJECTS: A cross-sectional study of 119 professional soccer players from Croatia aged 18-34 was carried out.
RESULTS: Here we confirm that the power function relationship between max and body mass of the professional soccer players results in an 'inflated' mass exponent of 0.75 (95% confidence interval from 0.56 to 0.93), but also the larger soccer players have disproportionately greater leg muscle girths. When the analysis was repeated incorporating the calf and thigh muscle girths rather than body mass as predictor variables, the analysis not only explained significantly more of the variance in max, but the sum of the exponents confirmed a surface-area law.
CONCLUSIONS: These findings confirm the pitfalls of fitting body-mass power laws and suggest using muscle-girth methodology as a more appropriate way to scale or normalize metabolic variables such as max for individuals of different body sizes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15513694     DOI: 10.1080/03014460410001723996

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Hum Biol        ISSN: 0301-4460            Impact factor:   1.533


  8 in total

Review 1.  Determinants of inter-specific variation in basal metabolic rate.

Authors:  Craig R White; Michael R Kearney
Journal:  J Comp Physiol B       Date:  2012-09-23       Impact factor: 2.200

Review 2.  Expression of VO2peak in Children and Youth, with Special Reference to Allometric Scaling.

Authors:  Mark Loftin; Melinda Sothern; Takashi Abe; Marc Bonis
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 11.136

3.  Causes and significance of variation in mammalian basal metabolism.

Authors:  David A Raichlen; Adam D Gordon; Magdalena N Muchlinski; J Josh Snodgrass
Journal:  J Comp Physiol B       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 2.200

Review 4.  Size Exponents for Scaling Maximal Oxygen Uptake in Over 6500 Humans: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Lorenzo Lolli; Alan M Batterham; Kathryn L Weston; Greg Atkinson
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 11.136

5.  Allometric scaling of aerobic fitness outputs in school-aged pubertal girls.

Authors:  André O Werneck; Jorge Conde; Manuel J Coelho-E-Silva; Artur Pereira; Daniela C Costa; Diogo Martinho; João P Duarte; João Valente-Dos-Santos; Rômulo A Fernandes; Mariana B Batista; David Ohara; Edilson S Cyrino; Enio R V Ronque
Journal:  BMC Pediatr       Date:  2019-04-08       Impact factor: 2.125

6.  Cross-cultural comparisons of aerobic and muscular fitness in Tanzanian and English youth: An allometric approach.

Authors:  Joyce Ndabi; Alan M Nevill; Gavin R H Sandercock
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-02-15       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  An Evaluation of Prediction Equations for the 6 Minute Walk Test in Healthy European Adults Aged 50-85 Years.

Authors:  Michael J Duncan; Jorge Mota; Joana Carvalho; Alan M Nevill
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-09-29       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Skeletal maturity and oxygen uptake in youth soccer controlling for concurrent size descriptors.

Authors:  Anderson S Teixeira; Luiz G A Guglielmo; Juliano Fernandes-da-Silva; Jan M Konarski; Daniela Costa; João P Duarte; Jorge Conde; João Valente-Dos-Santos; Manuel J Coelho-E-Silva; Robert M Malina
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-10-18       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.