Literature DB >> 15513252

How long do the advantages of learning to read a transparent orthography last? An investigation of the reading skills and reading impairment of Welsh children at 10 years of age.

Richard Hanley1, Jackie Masterson, Llinos Spencer, Dylan Evans.   

Abstract

Spencer and Hanley (2003) showed that Welsh-speaking children aged between 5 and 7 years who were learning to read Welsh (a transparent orthography) performed significantly better at reading both real words and nonwords than did English-speaking children living in Wales who were learning to read English (a deep orthography). In this study, the reading skills of these children were reexamined three years later, during their sixth year of formal reading instruction. The children learning to read English continued to perform poorly at reading low- and medium-frequency irregular words but no differences were observed in reading regular words or nonwords. These findings emphasize how long it takes to acquire a large sight vocabulary in English, but indicated that the reading skills of the majority of the English-speaking children had caught up with those of their Welsh-speaking counterparts. However, the poorest 25% of the English readers continued to perform much worse than the lowest performing 25% of Welsh readers on both words and nonwords. An underachieving tail of this kind was not observed in the reading performance of the Welsh-speaking group. Overall, these findings suggest that in the long term the detrimental effects of an opaque orthography are most damaging to the poorest readers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15513252     DOI: 10.1080/02724980343000819

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A        ISSN: 0272-4987


  8 in total

Review 1.  Cross-linguistic transfer in bilinguals reading in two alphabetic orthographies: The grain size accommodation hypothesis.

Authors:  Marie Lallier; Manuel Carreiras
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2018-02

2.  Developmental dyslexia in Chinese and English populations: dissociating the effect of dyslexia from language differences.

Authors:  Wei Hu; Hwee Ling Lee; Qiang Zhang; Tao Liu; Li Bo Geng; Mohamed L Seghier; Clare Shakeshaft; Tae Twomey; David W Green; Yi Ming Yang; Cathy J Price
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2010-05-20       Impact factor: 13.501

3.  The Science of Reading and Its Educational Implications.

Authors:  Mark S Seidenberg
Journal:  Lang Learn Dev       Date:  2013

4.  Cognitive profile of students who enter higher education with an indication of dyslexia.

Authors:  Maaike Callens; Wim Tops; Marc Brysbaert
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-06-13       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Costs and Benefits of Orthographic Inconsistency in Reading: Evidence from a Cross-Linguistic Comparison.

Authors:  Chiara Valeria Marinelli; Cristina Romani; Cristina Burani; Victoria A McGowan; Pierluigi Zoccolotti
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-06-29       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  English Word and Pseudoword Spellings and Phonological Awareness: Detailed Comparisons From Three L1 Writing Systems.

Authors:  Katherine I Martin; Emily Lawson; Kathryn Carpenter; Elisa Hummer
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2020-07-02

7.  A study of reading attitude and reading achievement among young learners in middle school.

Authors:  Aigul Akhmetova; Gaysha Imambayeva; Benő Csapó
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2022-07-14

8.  Metacognition for spelling in higher education students with dyslexia: is there evidence for the dual burden hypothesis?

Authors:  Wim Tops; Maaike Callens; Annemie Desoete; Michaël Stevens; Marc Brysbaert
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-09-05       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.