Literature DB >> 15510569

Family caregiver satisfaction with care at end of life: report from the cultural variations study (CVAS).

Etienne J Phipps1, Leonard E Braitman.   

Abstract

The objective of this study was to examine differences in family caregiver satisfaction with care at end of life based on site of death, in an observational study involving advanced cancer patients and their family caregivers. The study was based on follow-up interviews with 28 family caregivers of 28 patients who died during a two-year prospective study involving 68 patients and 68 family caregivers. Telephone interviews addressed the circumstances of the patients 'death, their satisfaction with the care provided to the patient, and their satisfaction with how well they were attended to by health providers. There were no associations between site of death (died at home vs. did not die at home) and family caregiver satisfaction with the overall care provided to the patient. However family caregivers of patients who died at home responded that they thought the patient was more at peace (with respect to spiritual and religious matters) than did family caregivers of patients who did not die at home (p = 0.003). Family caregivers of patients who died at home appeared to feel less satisfied with the attention paid to their own wishes regarding the patient's care (p = 0. 13), less satisfied with the emotional support provided to them by healthcare personnel taking care of the patient (p = 0. 08), and less satisfied with communication from health providers (p = 0. 11). Findings indicate that although dying at home appears to provide a more peaceful death for the patient, it may also distance family caregivers from health professionals and leave them feeling less supported during the patient's last days of life.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15510569     DOI: 10.1177/104990910402100506

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Hosp Palliat Care        ISSN: 1049-9091            Impact factor:   2.500


  5 in total

1.  Post-mortal bereavement of family caregivers in Germany: a prospective interview-based investigation.

Authors:  Christoph H R Wiese; Hannah C Morgenthal; Utz E Bartels; Andrea Vossen-Wellmann; Bernhard M Graf; Gerd G Hanekop
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2010-07-08       Impact factor: 1.704

2.  End-of-life care in Germany: Study design, methods and first results of the EPACS study (Establishment of Hospice and Palliative Care Services in Germany).

Authors:  Luis Carlos Escobar Pinzón; Eva Münster; Sabine Fischbeck; Michael Unrath; Matthias Claus; Tanja Martini; Martin Weber
Journal:  BMC Palliat Care       Date:  2010-07-30       Impact factor: 3.234

Review 3.  Concerns and potential improvements in end-of-life care from the perspectives of older patients and informal caregivers: a scoping review.

Authors:  Mina Motamedi; Caitlin Brandenburg; Mina Bakhit; Zoe A Michaleff; Loai Albarqouni; Justin Clark; Meidelynn Ooi; Danial Bahudin; Danielle Ní Chróinín; Magnolia Cardona
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2021-12-20       Impact factor: 3.921

4.  Place of Death for Persons With and Without Cognitive Impairment in the United States.

Authors:  Natalie G Regier; Valerie T Cotter; Bryan R Hansen; Janiece L Taylor; Rebecca J Wright
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2021-01-20       Impact factor: 5.562

5.  Is dying in hospital better than home in incurable cancer and what factors influence this? A population-based study.

Authors:  Barbara Gomes; Natalia Calanzani; Jonathan Koffman; Irene J Higginson
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2015-10-09       Impact factor: 8.775

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.