| Literature DB >> 15510418 |
Timothy D Wilson1, Thalia P Wheatley, Jaime L Kurtz, Elizabeth W Dunn, Daniel T Gilbert.
Abstract
These studies examined the conditions under which people engage in anticipatory construal before an evaluative event versus reconstrual after the event. Computer software informed college students that there was a 1.5%, 12%, 88%, or 98.5% chance that an opposite-sex student would pick them for a hypothetical date. When people had extreme expectations (1.5% or 98.5%), they changed their view of the student to be consistent with their expectations before learning the outcome (anticipatory reconstrual). When people had moderate expectations (12% or 88%), they formed relatively unbiased impressions before hand but reconstrued after learning the outcome of the dating game (postevent reconstrual). Either strategy can ameliorate the pain of a negative event in ways that people do not anticipate. Forecasters predicted that loosing would make them feel worse than it did and selected a higher dose of a drug to cope with an anticipated loss than did people who actually lost.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2004 PMID: 15510418 DOI: 10.1177/0146167203256974
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Pers Soc Psychol Bull ISSN: 0146-1672