Literature DB >> 15510310

Minimally invasive esophageal resection.

Miguel A Cuesta1, Wim T van den Broek, Donald L van der Peet, Sijbren Meijer.   

Abstract

Esophagus resection is the adequate treatment for some benign esophageal diseases, especially caustic and peptic stenosis and end-stage motility dysfunction. However, the most frequent indications for esophageal resection are the high-grade dysplasia of Barrett esophagus and nonmetastasized esophageal cancer. Different procedures have been developed to perform esophageal resection given the 5-year survival rate among operated patients of only 18%. The disadvantage of the conventional approach is the high morbidity rate, especially with pulmonary complications. Minimally invasive esophageal resections, which were first performed in 1991, may reduce this important morbidity and preserve the oncologic outcome. The first reports of morbidity and respiratory complications with this approach were discouraging and it seemed likely that the procedure would have to be abandoned. However, in the last 5 years, an important impetus for these techniques was given by Japanese groups and the group of Luketich in Pittsburgh. The outcomes of these new series are different than those of the beginning period, leading to an enormous expansion worldwide. Important factors for this change are the standardization of the operative technique, the experience of many surgeons with more advanced laparoscopic procedures, important improvements in instruments for dissection and division of tissues, a better anesthesia technique, and a better selection of patients for operation. Two minimally invasive techniques are being perfected: the three-stage operation by right thoracoscopy and laparoscopy, and the transhiatal laparoscopic approach. It seems that the first approach may be applied successfully for any tumor in the esophagus, whereas the transhiatal seems ideal for distal esophageal and esophagogastric junction tumors. This review paper discusses all these aspects, with special attention for indications and operative technique.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15510310     DOI: 10.1177/107155170401100304

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Semin Laparosc Surg        ISSN: 1071-5517


  4 in total

1.  Development of a navigation system for minimally invasive esophagectomy.

Authors:  H G Kenngott; J Neuhaus; B P Müller-Stich; I Wolf; M Vetter; H-P Meinzer; J Köninger; M W Büchler; C N Gutt
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-12-20       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  First experience with robot-assisted thoracoscopic esophagolymphadenectomy for esophageal cancer.

Authors:  R van Hillegersberg; J Boone; W A Draaisma; I A M J Broeders; M J M M Giezeman; I H M Borel Rinkes
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-05-15       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Traditional invasive vs. minimally invasive esophagectomy: a multi-center, randomized trial (TIME-trial).

Authors:  Surya Say Biere; Kirsten W Maas; Luigi Bonavina; Josep Roig Garcia; Mark I van Berge Henegouwen; Camiel Rosman; Meindert N Sosef; Elly S M de Lange; H Jaap Bonjer; Miguel A Cuesta; Donald L van der Peet
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2011-01-12       Impact factor: 2.102

4.  Thoracoscopic resection for esophageal cancer: A review of literature.

Authors:  Joris J G Scheepers; Donald L van der Peet; Alexander A F A Veenhof; Miguel A Cuesta
Journal:  J Minim Access Surg       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 1.407

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.