Literature DB >> 15510019

Safety of minimally invasive pituitary surgery (MIPS) compared with a traditional approach.

David R White1, Robert E Sonnenburg, Matthew G Ewend, Brent A Senior.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Transsphenoidal hypophysectomy is becoming progressively less invasive. Recent endoscopic techniques avoid nasal or intraoral incisions, use of nasal speculums, and nasal packing. Several case series of endoscopic endonasal pituitary surgery have been reported, but relatively little data exists comparing complication rates to more traditional approaches. We compare the complications of our first 50 cases of endoscopic, minimally invasive pituitary surgery (MIPS) to our last 50 sublabial transseptal (SLTS) procedures. STUDY
DESIGN: Retrospective case control study.
METHODS: Fifty consecutive MIPS procedures and 50 consecutive SLTS procedures were reviewed retrospectively. Complication rates were analyzed and compared.
RESULTS: Total complications per patient (P = .005), postoperative epistaxis (P = .031), lip anesthesia (P = .013), and deviated septum (P = .028) occurred more often in the SLTS group. No significant difference was seen in cerebrospinal fluid leak, meningitis, ophthalmoplegia, visual acuity loss, diabetes insipidus, intracranial hemorrhage, or death. In the MIPS group, length of stay (P < .001), use of lumbar drainage (P = .007), and nasal packing (P < .001) were also significantly reduced.
CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic endonasal pituitary surgery provides improved complication rates when compared with SLTS approaches. In addition, we note advantages of the MIPS approach, including reduced length of hospital stay and decreased use of lumbar drainage and nasal packing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15510019     DOI: 10.1097/01.mlg.0000147925.04605.cc

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Laryngoscope        ISSN: 0023-852X            Impact factor:   3.325


  27 in total

Review 1.  Complications of endoscopic surgery of the pituitary adenomas: analysis of 570 patients and review of the literature.

Authors:  Mustafa Berker; Derya Burcu Hazer; Taşkın Yücel; Alper Gürlek; Ayşenur Cila; Mustafa Aldur; Metin Onerci
Journal:  Pituitary       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 4.107

2.  Light at the end of the tunnel: the learning curve associated with endoscopic transsphenoidal skull base surgery.

Authors:  Stuart James Smith; George Eralil; Kelvin Woon; Anshul Sama; Graham Dow; Iain Robertson
Journal:  Skull Base       Date:  2010-03

Review 3.  Back to the Egyptians: neurosurgery via the nose. A five-thousand year history and the recent contribution of the endoscope.

Authors:  Paolo Cappabianca; Enrico de Divitiis
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2006-08-30       Impact factor: 3.042

4.  Endoscopic versus nonendoscopic surgery for resection of pituitary adenomas: a national database study.

Authors:  Khodayar Goshtasbi; Brandon M Lehrich; Mehdi Abouzari; Arash Abiri; Jack Birkenbeuel; Ming-Ying Lan; Wei-Hsin Wang; Gilbert Cadena; Frank P K Hsu; Edward C Kuan
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2020-03-13       Impact factor: 5.115

5.  Endoscopic anatomy of sellar region.

Authors:  Gerson Evandro Perondi; Gustavo Rassier Isolan; Paulo Henrique Pires de Aguiar; Marco Antônio Stefani; E Frederico Falcetta
Journal:  Pituitary       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 4.107

Review 6.  The experience with transsphenoidal surgery and its importance to outcomes.

Authors:  Jürgen Honegger; Florian Grimm
Journal:  Pituitary       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 4.107

7.  Forces Applied at the Skull Base during Transnasal Endoscopic Transsphenoidal Pituitary Tumor Excision.

Authors:  James R Bekeny; Philip J Swaney; Robert J Webster; Paul T Russell; Kyle D Weaver
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2013-05-09

8.  Is Septoplasty Necessary When Using the Endoscopic Endonasal Transsphenoidal Approach for a Deviated Nasal Septum?

Authors:  Do Hyun Kim; Yong-Kil Hong; Sin-Soo Jeun; Jae-Sung Park; Soo Whan Kim; Jin Hee Cho; Yong Jin Park; Seon Ik Kim; Sung Won Kim
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2018-04-13

9.  Variations of endonasal anatomy: relevance for the endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal approach.

Authors:  Erik J van Lindert; Koen Ingels; Emmanuel Mylanus; J André Grotenhuis
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2010-03-23       Impact factor: 2.216

10.  Isolated sphenoid sinusitis or mucocele: a potential complication of endonasal transsphenoidal surgery.

Authors:  Yu-Jen Lu; Chen-Nen Chang; Ping-Ching Pai; Kuo-Chen Wei; Chi-Cheng Chuang
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2008-08-13       Impact factor: 4.130

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.