Literature DB >> 15509931

Aesthetic outcomes in patients undergoing breast conservation therapy for the treatment of localized breast cancer.

Anureet K Bajaj1, Philantha S Kon, Kerby C Oberg, Duncan A G Miles.   

Abstract

Localized breast cancer can be treated with lumpectomy and postoperative radiation therapy, also called breast conservation therapy, with an efficacy equivalent to that of mastectomy. Reports evaluating the effects of radiotherapy suggested that breast conservation therapy had "acceptable" cosmetic outcomes; thus, posttreatment evaluation for aesthetic impact has not been instituted as a standard of care. More recent reports have suggested that the effect of breast conservation therapy on aesthetic outcome is not minimal and that patients may benefit from reconstructive consultation. The purpose of this study was to measure objectively the aesthetic change in women who undergo breast conservation therapy and whether the extent of change is significant enough (objectively and subjectively) to warrant plastic surgery consultation. The authors evaluated 21 patients who had undergone breast conservation therapy. Eleven non-breast cancer patients seeking plastic surgery consultation were used as controls. Standardized five-view photographs (frontal, left and right lateral, and left and right lateral oblique views) were obtained. Patient photograph sets were compiled and evaluated independently by eight reviewers (four surgeons, two nurses, and two medical students). Reviewers evaluated the photographs using the breast asymmetry score (score range, 0 to 9) assessing breast size, ptosis, nipple-areola position, shape, scar appearance, contour deformity, and skin changes. The authors considered 2 SD above the control mean as significant. Breast conservation therapy patients also completed a 15-item questionnaire targeting objective and subjective data about treatment-related breast change. Breast conservation therapy patients had an average treatment-related asymmetry score of 1.93, with 35 percent demonstrating significant change as compared with controls. Although most patients (86 percent) were satisfied with the cancer treatment outcome, all patients noted asymmetry. The authors' data indicate that breast conservation therapy can cause significant asymmetry; thus, an option for plastic surgery consultation as part of the treatment protocol is warranted.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15509931     DOI: 10.1097/01.prs.0000138813.64478.a7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 0032-1052            Impact factor:   4.730


  19 in total

Review 1.  Oncoplastic breast surgery: current strategies.

Authors:  Merisa Piper; Anne Warren Peled; Hani Sbitany
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2015-04

Review 2.  Physical examination of the female cancer patient with sexual concerns: What oncologists and patients should expect from consultation with a specialist.

Authors:  Stacy Tessler Lindau; Emily M Abramsohn; Shirley R Baron; Judith Florendo; Hope K Haefner; Anuja Jhingran; Vanessa Kennedy; Mukta K Krane; David M Kushner; Jennifer McComb; Diane F Merritt; Julie E Park; Amy Siston; Margaret Straub; Lauren Streicher
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2016-01-19       Impact factor: 508.702

3.  Image-guided tumor ablation: emerging technologies and future directions.

Authors:  Justin P McWilliams; Edward W Lee; Shota Yamamoto; Christopher T Loh; Stephen T Kee
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 1.513

4.  Long-Term Satisfaction and Body Image After Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy.

Authors:  Chelsea Anderson; Jessica Y Islam; M Elizabeth Hodgson; Susan A Sabatino; Juan L Rodriguez; Clara N Lee; Dale P Sandler; Hazel B Nichols
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2017-01-05       Impact factor: 5.344

5.  Patient-reported outcome measurement compared with professional judgment of cosmetic results after breast-conserving therapy.

Authors:  A T P M Brands-Appeldoorn; A J G Maaskant-Braat; W A R Zwaans; J P Dieleman; K E Schenk; C L Broekhuysen; H Weerdenburg; R Daniels; V C G Tjan-Heijnen; R M H Roumen
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2018-12-01       Impact factor: 3.677

6.  Oncologic and Cosmetic Outcomes of Oncoplastic Breast Surgery in Locally Advanced Breast Cancer After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy, Experience from a Developing Country.

Authors:  Mina M G Youssef; Alfred Namour; Omar Z Youssef; Ahmed Morsi
Journal:  Indian J Surg Oncol       Date:  2017-08-15

Review 7.  Minimally invasive ablative therapies for invasive breast carcinomas: an overview of current literature.

Authors:  Stijn van Esser; Maurice A A J van den Bosch; Paul J van Diest; Willem Th M Mali; Inne H M Borel Rinkes; Richard van Hillegersberg
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 3.352

8.  Therapeutic reduction mammoplasty in large-breasted women with cancer using superior and superomedial pedicles.

Authors:  Adel Denewer; Fayez Shahatto; Waleed Elnahas; Omar Farouk; Sameh Roshdy; Ashraf Khater; Osama Hussein; Saleh Teima; Mohammed Hafez; Samir Zidan; Nazem Shams; Sherif Kotb
Journal:  Breast Cancer (Dove Med Press)       Date:  2012-10-25

9.  Bilateral reduction mammoplasty following breast cancer: A case-control study.

Authors:  Arianna Dal Cin; Casey Knight; Kaitlyn F Whelan; Forough Farrokhyar
Journal:  Can J Plast Surg       Date:  2012

10.  Strategies for the selection of oncoplastic techniques in the treatment of early-stage breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Shengchao Huang; Pu Qiu; Jianwen Li; Zhongzeng Liang; Zeming Yan; Kangwei Luo; Baoyi Huang; Liyan Yu; Weizhang Chen; Yuanqi Zhang
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2021-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.