Literature DB >> 15509925

Treatment of midfacial defects using prostheses supported by ITI dental implants.

Paolo Scolozzi1, Bertrand Jaques.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate retrospectively the use of ITI dental implants used for anchoring facial prostheses in the restorative treatment of midface defects. The authors analyzed the clinical data of 26 patients with orbital defects (n = 11), orbitonasal defects (n = 4), orbitonasomaxillary defects (n = 3), and nasal defects (n = 8). Data included age, sex, primary disease, implant position, implant length, implant failure, prosthetic attachment, radiation therapy, and peri-implant skin reactions. Follow-up was at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months and then on a yearly basis. The authors noted the status of healing and complications, if any. In total, 62 implants were placed as follows: 27 (43.5 percent) for orbital prostheses, 12 (19.4 percent) for orbitonasal prostheses, 14 (22.6 percent) for orbitonasomaxillary prostheses, and nine (14.5 percent) for nasal prostheses. Thirty-eight implants (61.3 percent) were placed in previously irradiated areas in 18 patients (69.2 percent). Mild skin reactions together with mild accumulation of sebaceous crusting around implants were recorded in 14.2 percent of the skin observations. No patient experienced severe inflammation requiring administration of systemic antibiotics or surgical revision. Implant success was 100 percent in both irradiated and nonirradiated patients. In conclusion, ITI dental implants result in a high rate of success in retaining midface prostheses and offer good stability and aesthetic satisfaction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15509925     DOI: 10.1097/01.prs.0000138595.86570.3e

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 0032-1052            Impact factor:   4.730


  8 in total

1.  A national survey of restorative consultants' treatment provision for head and neck oncology patients.

Authors:  G Calvert; S C Barclay; J S Owens; A Alani
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 1.626

2.  Epithetic nasal reconstruction for nasal carcinoma: retrospective analysis on 22 patients.

Authors:  Giorgos Papaspyrou; Bernhard Schick; Mathias Schneider; Basel Al Kadah
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-09-20       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  Prosthetic management of patients with oro-maxillo-facial defects: a long-term follow-up retrospective study.

Authors:  G Gastaldi; L Palumbo; C Moreschi; E F Gherlone; P Capparé
Journal:  Oral Implantol (Rome)       Date:  2017-11-30

4.  Retrospective study of treatment outcomes with implant retained auricular prostheses at a tertiary referral care centre.

Authors:  Gunjan Pruthi; Kirti Bansal; Veena Jain; Dheeraj Kumar Koli
Journal:  J Oral Biol Craniofac Res       Date:  2020-05-04

5.  Change in color of a maxillofacial prosthetic silicone elastomer, following investment in molds of different materials.

Authors:  Tania Sethi; Mohit Kheur; Trevor Coward; Naimesha Patel
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2015 Apr-Jun

6.  Rehabilitation of single finger amputation with customized silicone prosthesis.

Authors:  Niharika Yadav; Pooran Chand; Sunit Kumar Jurel
Journal:  Natl J Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2016 Jan-Jun

7.  Rehabilitation of a Midfacial Defect Using a Two-Piece Maxillofacial Prosthesis: A Case Report.

Authors:  Chakradhar Vadlamudi; Lakshmana Rao Bathala; Satyanarayana S V Tammineedi; Bhargavi Bandlamudi; Parvathi Pshl
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-02-11

8.  Effect of the simulated Indian and Mediterranean climates on the Shore A hardness of maxillofacial silicone.

Authors:  Amanda Ferreira; Meena Aras; Vidya Chitre; Ivy Coutinho; Praveen Rajagopal
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2018 Oct-Dec
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.