Literature DB >> 15509755

The effect of motor imagery on spinal segmental excitability.

Sheng Li1, Derek G Kamper, Jennifer A Stevens, William Z Rymer.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of motor imagery on spinal segmental excitability by recording the reflex responses to externally applied stretch of the extrinsic finger flexors and extensors during the performance of an imaginary task. Nine young healthy subjects performed a series of imagined flexion-extension movements of the fingers. Muscle stretch was imposed concurrently by applying rotations of the metacarpophalangeal joints at 100, 300, or 500 degrees /sec. Three of the nine tested subjects also generated 0.2 Newton meter voluntary flexion torque in preloading tasks before stretch. At 300 degrees /sec stretch, electromyogram (EMG) and torque reflex responses, which were observed in the finger flexors in four of nine subjects during motor imagery, were activated at a short latency (38.6 +/- 10.6 msec). This latency was similar to that recorded during a stretch of preactivated flexor muscles (34.4 +/- 3.6 msec), in which motoneurons are already suprathreshold and in which monosynaptic effects of muscle afferents are likely to be discernable. In a similar manner, for stretches imposed at 500 degrees /sec, responses to stretch of the flexors were observed in all five tested subjects in imaginary flexion tasks at very short latencies (26.4 +/- 3.7 msec), again similar to those induced by tendon taps (22.8 +/- 1.2 msec). No EMG response was observed at rest during stretches. These observations support the view that effects must have been mediated by imagery-related subthreshold activation of spinal motoneurons and/or interneurons, rather than by long-latency transcortical reflex responses. We conclude that motor imagery has a potent effect on the excitability of spinal reflex pathways.

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15509755      PMCID: PMC6730147          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2781-04.2004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  24 in total

1.  The beat goes on: rhythmic modulation of cortical potentials by imagined tapping.

Authors:  Allen Osman; Robert Albert; K Richard Ridderinkhof; Guido Band; Maurits van der Molen
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  Movement-specific enhancement of corticospinal excitability at subthreshold levels during motor imagery.

Authors:  Sheng Li
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-12-08       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Motor planning, imagery, and execution in the distributed motor network: a time-course study with functional MRI.

Authors:  Takashi Hanakawa; Michael A Dimyan; Mark Hallett
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2008-03-20       Impact factor: 5.357

4.  Modulation of corticospinal excitability dependent upon imagined force level.

Authors:  Nobuaki Mizuguchi; Izumi Umehara; Hiroki Nakata; Kazuyuki Kanosue
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-07-23       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Motor excitability during imagination and observation of foot dorsiflexions.

Authors:  Joachim Liepert; Nina Neveling
Journal:  J Neural Transm (Vienna)       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.575

6.  Emulation of computer mouse control with a noninvasive brain-computer interface.

Authors:  Dennis J McFarland; Dean J Krusienski; William A Sarnacki; Jonathan R Wolpaw
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2008-03-05       Impact factor: 5.379

7.  Influence of kinesthetic motor imagery and effector specificity on the long-latency stretch response.

Authors:  Christopher J Forgaard; Ian M Franks; Dana Maslovat; Romeo Chua
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2019-09-25       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Voluntary breathing influences corticospinal excitability of nonrespiratory finger muscles.

Authors:  Sheng Li; William Zev Rymer
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-12-15       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Abnormal motor excitability in patients with psychogenic paresis. A TMS study.

Authors:  Joachim Liepert; Thomas Hassa; Oliver Tüscher; Roger Schmidt
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2009-01-29       Impact factor: 4.849

Review 10.  Motor imagery and action observation: cognitive tools for rehabilitation.

Authors:  Th Mulder
Journal:  J Neural Transm (Vienna)       Date:  2007-06-20       Impact factor: 3.575

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.