Literature DB >> 15509669

Modeling and predicting stress-induced immunosuppression in mice using blood parameters.

Carlton L Schwab1, Ruping Fan, Qiang Zheng, L Peyton Myers, Pamela Hébert, Stephen B Pruett.   

Abstract

Previous studies have shown that the area under the corticosterone concentration vs. time curve (AUC) can be used to model and predict the effects of restraint stress and chemical stressors on a variety of immunological parameters in the mouse spleen and thymus. In order to complete a risk assessment parallelogram, similar data are needed with blood as the source of immune system cells, because this is the only tissue routinely available from human subjects. Therefore, studies were conducted using treatments for which the corticosterone AUC values are already known: exogenous corticosterone, restraint, propanil, atrazine, and ethanol. Immunological parameters were measured using peripheral blood from mice treated with a series of dosages of each of these agents. Flow cytometry was used to quantify MHC II, B220, CD4, and CD8 cells. Leukocyte and differential counts were done. Spleen cell number and NK cell activity were evaluated to confirm similarity to previous studies. Immune parameter data from mouse blood indicate that MHC II expression has consistent quantitative relationships to corticosterone AUC values, similar to but less consistent than those observed in the spleen. Other immune parameters tended to have greater variability in the blood than in the spleen. The pattern observed in the spleen in which the chemical stressors generally produced very similar effects as noted for restraint stress (at the same corticosterone AUC values) was not observed for blood leukocytes. Nevertheless, MHC class II expression seems to provide a reasonably consistent indication of stress exposure in blood and spleen.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15509669     DOI: 10.1093/toxsci/kfi014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Toxicol Sci        ISSN: 1096-0929            Impact factor:   4.849


  21 in total

1.  Machine learning analysis of the relationship between changes in immunological parameters and changes in resistance to Listeria monocytogenes: a new approach for risk assessment and systems immunology.

Authors:  Zhifa Liu; Changhe Yuan; Stephen B Pruett
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2012-06-13       Impact factor: 4.849

Review 2.  Enhancing versus suppressive effects of stress on immune function: implications for immunoprotection and immunopathology.

Authors:  Firdaus S Dhabhar
Journal:  Neuroimmunomodulation       Date:  2009-06-29       Impact factor: 2.492

3.  The role of glucocorticoids in the immediate vs. delayed effects of acute ethanol exposure on cytokine production in a binge drinking model.

Authors:  Mitzi Glover; Bing Cheng; Xiaomin Deng; Stephen Pruett
Journal:  Int Immunopharmacol       Date:  2011-02-11       Impact factor: 4.932

4.  Morphine suppresses MHC-II expression on circulating B lymphocytes via activation of the HPA.

Authors:  Alexandria L Nugent; Richard A Houghtling; Barbara M Bayer
Journal:  J Neuroimmune Pharmacol       Date:  2010-05-04       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 5.  The short-term stress response - Mother nature's mechanism for enhancing protection and performance under conditions of threat, challenge, and opportunity.

Authors:  Firdaus S Dhabhar
Journal:  Front Neuroendocrinol       Date:  2018-03-26       Impact factor: 8.606

Review 6.  Practical murine hematopathology: a comparative review and implications for research.

Authors:  Karyn E O'Connell; Amy M Mikkola; Aaron M Stepanek; Andyna Vernet; Christopher D Hall; Chia C Sun; Eda Yildirim; John F Staropoli; Jeannie T Lee; Diane E Brown
Journal:  Comp Med       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 0.982

7.  Dosage scaling of alcohol in binge exposure models in mice: An empirical assessment of the relationship between dose, alcohol exposure, and peak blood concentrations in humans and mice.

Authors:  Stephen Pruett; Wei Tan; George E Howell; Bindu Nanduri
Journal:  Alcohol       Date:  2020-04-04       Impact factor: 2.405

8.  Enhancing versus Suppressive Effects of Stress on Immune Function: Implications for Immunoprotection versus Immunopathology.

Authors:  Firdaus S Dhabhar
Journal:  Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol       Date:  2008-03-15       Impact factor: 3.406

9.  Modern approaches to understanding stress and disease susceptibility: A review with special emphasis on respiratory disease.

Authors:  Palok Aich; Andrew A Potter; Philip J Griebel
Journal:  Int J Gen Med       Date:  2009-07-30

10.  Patterns of immunotoxicity associated with chronic as compared with acute exposure to chemical or physical stressors and their relevance with regard to the role of stress and with regard to immunotoxicity testing.

Authors:  Stephen B Pruett; Ruping Fan; Qiang Zheng; Carlton Schwab
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2009-04-07       Impact factor: 4.849

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.