Literature DB >> 15509315

Vagus nerve stimulation therapy after failed cranial surgery for intractable epilepsy: results from the vagus nerve stimulation therapy patient outcome registry.

Arun Paul Amar1, Michael L J Apuzzo, Charles Y Liu.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the effectiveness of vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) therapy among patients with persistent or recurrent seizures after lobar resection, callosotomy, and other cranial operations for intractable epilepsy.
METHODS: Data were obtained from the VNS therapy patient outcome registry, which was established after United States Food and Drug Administration approval of the VNS device in 1997 as a means of capturing open-label clinical data outside of protocol. The integrity of the systems for collecting and processing registry data was authenticated by an independent auditing agency. The effect of potential selection bias, however, remains uncertain.
RESULTS: Two nonconsecutive cohorts were compared: patients tracked in the registry who had previously undergone cranial surgery for epilepsy (CS group, n = 921) and those who had not (non-CS group, n = 3822). For the CS group, the median reduction in seizure frequency was 42.5% after 3 months of VNS therapy, 42.9% at 6 months, 45.7% at 12 months, 52.0% at 18 months, and 50.5% at 24 months. For the non-CS group, analogous rates were 47.0%, 52.9%, 60.0%, 62.7%, and 66.7%, respectively. In the CS group, seizures were reduced by at least 50% in 55.1% of patients, at least 75% in 31.4% of patients, at least 90% in 17.3% of patients, and 100% in 5.1% of patients after 24 months of VNS therapy. Response rates were more pronounced in the non-CS group: at least 50% in 62.2% of patients, at least 75% in 43.7% of patients, at least 90% in 26.8% of patients, and 100% in 8.3% of patients. Patients in both groups experienced marked improvements in quality of life parameters.
CONCLUSION: The effectiveness of VNS is maintained during prolonged stimulation, and overall seizure control continues to improve with time. Patients in whom prior cranial surgery had failed did not respond as favorably as all other patients receiving VNS therapy. Nonetheless, many of the former group improved substantially. Thus, on the basis of these open-label data, VNS therapy represents a potentially palliative treatment option for patients with refractory seizures after failed cranial surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15509315     DOI: 10.1227/01.neu.0000141073.08427.76

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosurgery        ISSN: 0148-396X            Impact factor:   4.654


  12 in total

1.  Electrical stimulation in epilepsy: vagus nerve and brain stimulation.

Authors:  Barbara C Jobst
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Neurol       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 3.598

Review 2.  Deep brain stimulation for the treatment of epilepsy: circuits, targets, and trials.

Authors:  Nealen G Laxpati; Willard S Kasoff; Robert E Gross
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 7.620

3.  Quality-of-life metrics with vagus nerve stimulation for epilepsy from provider survey data.

Authors:  Dario J Englot; Kevin H Hassnain; John D Rolston; Stephen C Harward; Saurabh R Sinha; Michael M Haglund
Journal:  Epilepsy Behav       Date:  2016-12-11       Impact factor: 2.937

4.  Corpus callosotomy in children.

Authors:  Tai-Tong Wong; Shang-Yeong Kwan; Kai-Ping Chang; Wu Hsiu-Mei; Tsui-Fen Yang; Ying-Sheue Chen; Lee Yi-Yen
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2006-07-08       Impact factor: 1.475

5.  Long-term results of vagus nerve stimulation in children and adolescents with drug-resistant epilepsy.

Authors:  Beata Majkowska-Zwolińska; Piotr Zwoliński; Marcin Roszkowski; Krzysztof Drabik
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2012-01-06       Impact factor: 1.475

6.  Efficacy of vagus nerve stimulation as a treatment for medically intractable epilepsy in brain tumor patients. A case-controlled study using the VNS therapy Patient Outcome Registry.

Authors:  Kunal S Patel; Douglas R Labar; Charles M Gordon; Kevin H Hassnain; Theodore H Schwartz
Journal:  Seizure       Date:  2013-06-12       Impact factor: 3.184

Review 7.  Vagus nerve stimulation therapy: indications, programing, and outcomes.

Authors:  Takamichi Yamamoto
Journal:  Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo)       Date:  2015-04-28       Impact factor: 1.742

8.  Surgical revision after Vagus Nerve Stimulation. A case series.

Authors:  Philipp Spindler; Peter Vajkoczy; Ulf Christoph Schneider
Journal:  Epilepsy Behav Rep       Date:  2021-03-26

Review 9.  Rates and Predictors of Seizure Freedom With Vagus Nerve Stimulation for Intractable Epilepsy.

Authors:  Dario J Englot; John D Rolston; Clinton W Wright; Kevin H Hassnain; Edward F Chang
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 4.654

10.  Vagus Nerve Stimulation for Pediatric and Adult Patients with Pharmaco-resistant Epilepsy.

Authors:  Fan-Gang Meng; Fu-Min Jia; Xiao-Hui Ren; Yan Ge; Kai-Liang Wang; Yan-Shan Ma; Ming Ge; Kai Zhang; Wen-Han Hu; Xin Zhang; Wei Hu; Jian-Guo Zhang
Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)       Date:  2015-10-05       Impact factor: 2.628

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.