OBJECTIVE: Cerebral hyperperfusion syndrome after carotid endarterectomy (CEA) is a rare but potentially devastating complication. The purpose of the present study, which was not a randomized controlled trial but a case cohort study with historical control, was to determine whether pretreatment with a novel free radical scavenger, edaravone, could prevent occurrence of cerebral hyperperfusion after CEA. METHODS: Fifty patients with ipsilateral internal carotid artery stenosis (>/=70%) underwent CEA with administration of edaravone before internal carotid artery clamping. Preoperative cerebral blood flow and cerebrovascular reactivity (CVR) to acetazolamide were assessed with single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT). Cerebral blood flow also was measured immediately after CEA and on the 3rd postoperative day. RESULTS: Cerebral hyperperfusion (cerebral blood flow increase >/=100% compared with preoperative values) was revealed by SPECT performed immediately after CEA in only one patient (2%), who also exhibited reduced preoperative CVR. The incidence of post-CEA hyperperfusion as revealed by SPECT in the control group (51 CEA patients without administration of edaravone) was significantly higher (16%) (P = 0.0310, control versus treatment group). In addition, in a subgroup of patients with reduced preoperative CVR, the incidence of post-CEA hyperperfusion as revealed by SPECT in the edaravone group (7%) was significantly lower than that in the control group (67%) (P = 0.0029). Logistic regression analysis demonstrated that reduced preoperative CVR and absence of pretreatment with edaravone were significant independent predictors of post-CEA hyperperfusion as revealed by SPECT. CONCLUSION: Pretreatment with edaravone can prevent occurrence of cerebral hyperperfusion after CEA.
OBJECTIVE:Cerebral hyperperfusion syndrome after carotid endarterectomy (CEA) is a rare but potentially devastating complication. The purpose of the present study, which was not a randomized controlled trial but a case cohort study with historical control, was to determine whether pretreatment with a novel free radical scavenger, edaravone, could prevent occurrence of cerebral hyperperfusion after CEA. METHODS: Fifty patients with ipsilateral internal carotid artery stenosis (>/=70%) underwent CEA with administration of edaravone before internal carotid artery clamping. Preoperative cerebral blood flow and cerebrovascular reactivity (CVR) to acetazolamide were assessed with single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT). Cerebral blood flow also was measured immediately after CEA and on the 3rd postoperative day. RESULTS: Cerebral hyperperfusion (cerebral blood flow increase >/=100% compared with preoperative values) was revealed by SPECT performed immediately after CEA in only one patient (2%), who also exhibited reduced preoperative CVR. The incidence of post-CEA hyperperfusion as revealed by SPECT in the control group (51 CEA patients without administration of edaravone) was significantly higher (16%) (P = 0.0310, control versus treatment group). In addition, in a subgroup of patients with reduced preoperative CVR, the incidence of post-CEA hyperperfusion as revealed by SPECT in the edaravone group (7%) was significantly lower than that in the control group (67%) (P = 0.0029). Logistic regression analysis demonstrated that reduced preoperative CVR and absence of pretreatment with edaravone were significant independent predictors of post-CEA hyperperfusion as revealed by SPECT. CONCLUSION: Pretreatment with edaravone can prevent occurrence of cerebral hyperperfusion after CEA.
Authors: Aamir Badruddin; Muhammad A Taqi; Michael G Abraham; Dhimant Dani; Osama O Zaidat Journal: Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep Date: 2011-02 Impact factor: 5.081
Authors: Yiming Xiao; Hassan Rivaz; Hidetoshi Kasuya; Suguru Yokosako; Cristina Mindru; Jeanne Teitelbaum; Denis Sirhan; David Sinclair; Mark Angle; Benjamin W Y Lo Journal: Transl Stroke Res Date: 2018-01-10 Impact factor: 6.829
Authors: J-I Nomura; I Uwano; M Sasaki; K Kudo; F Yamashita; K Ito; S Fujiwara; M Kobayashi; K Ogasawara Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2017-10-05 Impact factor: 3.825