Literature DB >> 15509226

Investigating the independent evolution of the size of floral organs via G-matrix estimation and artificial selection.

Lynda F Delph1, Frank M Frey, Janet C Steven, Janet L Gehring.   

Abstract

The attractiveness of a plant to pollinators is dependent on both the number of flowers produced and the size of the petals. However, limiting resources often result in a size/number trade-off, whereby the plant can make either more flowers or larger flowers, but not both. If developmental genes underlying sepal and petal identity (some of which overlap) also influence size, then this shared genetic basis could constrain the independent evolution of floral size and attractiveness. Here, we determined whether the size of sepals and petals in the dioecious perennial, Silene latifolia, are developmentally independent by performing two experiments: a genetic variance-covariance experiment to estimate genetic correlations between calyx width, petal-limb length, flower mass, and number and a four-bout artificial-selection experiment to alter calyx width and estimate the correlated response in petal-limb length. In addition, we determined whether variation in petal-limb length is the result of cell expansion or cell proliferation. The first experiment revealed that petal-limb length is not genetically correlated with calyx width, and the second experiment confirmed this; selection on calyx width did not result in a predictable or significant change in petal-limb length. Flower number was negatively correlated with all the floral traits measured, indicating a flower size/number trade-off. Cell number, but not size, explained a significant amount of the variation in petal-limb length. We conclude that the size of the two outer floral organs can evolve independently. This species can therefore increase the number of flowers produced by decreasing investment in the calyx without simultaneously decreasing petal size and the attractiveness of each individual flower to pollinators.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15509226     DOI: 10.1111/j.1525-142X.2004.04052.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evol Dev        ISSN: 1520-541X            Impact factor:   1.930


  9 in total

1.  Pollination ecology of Silene acutifolia (Caryophyllaceae): floral traits variation and pollinator attraction.

Authors:  María Luisa Buide
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2005-12-12       Impact factor: 4.357

Review 2.  Linking the evolution of gender variation to floral development.

Authors:  Thomas R Meagher
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2007-04-07       Impact factor: 4.357

3.  Visibility vs. biomass in flowers: exploring corolla allocation in Mediterranean entomophilous plants.

Authors:  Javier Herrera
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2009-03-02       Impact factor: 4.357

4.  A test of the size-constraint hypothesis for a limit to sexual dimorphism in plants.

Authors:  Anne-Marie Labouche; John R Pannell
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2016-04-01       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Could seasonally deteriorating environments favour the evolution of autogamous selfing and a drought escape physiology through indirect selection? A test of the time limitation hypothesis using artificial selection in Clarkia.

Authors:  Simon K Emms; Alisa A Hove; Leah S Dudley; Susan J Mazer; Amy S Verhoeven
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2018-03-14       Impact factor: 4.357

6.  Genetic differences among populations in sexual dimorphism: evidence for selection on males in a dioecious plant.

Authors:  Q Yu; E D Ellen; M J Wade; L F Delph
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2011-03-14       Impact factor: 2.411

7.  Dioecious Silene latifolia plants show sexual dimorphism in the vegetative stage.

Authors:  Jitka Zluvova; Jiri Zak; Bohuslav Janousek; Boris Vyskot
Journal:  BMC Plant Biol       Date:  2010-09-20       Impact factor: 4.215

8.  Variation in sexual dimorphism in a wind-pollinated plant: the influence of geographical context and life-cycle dynamics.

Authors:  Gemma Puixeu; Melinda Pickup; David L Field; Spencer C H Barrett
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2019-08-12       Impact factor: 10.151

9.  Differences in the selection response of serially repeated color pattern characters: standing variation, development, and evolution.

Authors:  Cerisse E Allen; Patrícia Beldade; Bas J Zwaan; Paul M Brakefield
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2008-03-26       Impact factor: 3.260

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.