Literature DB >> 15509075

Electron beam quality correction factors for plane-parallel ionization chambers: Monte Carlo calculations using the PENELOPE system.

Josep Sempau1, Pedro Andreo, Judith Aldana, Jocelyne Mazurier, Francesc Salvat.   

Abstract

Simulations of three plane-parallel ionization chambers have been used to determine directly the chamber- and quality-dependent factors fc,Q, instead of the product (Sw,air p)Q, and kQ,Q0 (or kQ,Q,int) for a broad range of electron beam qualities (4-20 MeV) using divergent monoenergetic beams and phase-space data from two accelerators. An original calculation method has been used which circumvents the weakness of the so far assumed independence between stopping-power ratios and perturbation factors. Very detailed descriptions of the geometry and materials of the chambers have been obtained from the manufacturers, and prepared as input to the PENELOPE 2003 Monte Carlo system using a computer code that includes correlated sampling and particle splitting. Values of the beam quality factors have been determined for the case of an electron reference beam. The calculated values have been compared with those in the IAEA TRS-398 dosimetry protocol and the differences analysed. The results for a NACP-02 chamber show remarkably good agreement with TRS-398 at high electron beam qualities but differ slightly at low energies. Arguments to explain the differences include questioning the undemonstrated assumption that the NACP is a 'perturbation-free' chamber even at very low electron beam energies. Results for Wellhöfer PPC-40 and PPC-05 chambers cannot be compared with data from others for these chambers because no calculations or reliable experimental data exist. It has been found that the results for the PPC-40 are very close to those of a Roos chamber, but the values for the PPC-05 are considerably different from those of a Markus chamber, and rather approach those of a Roos chamber. Results for monoenergetic electrons and accelerator phase-space data have been compared to assess the need for detailed and costly simulations, finding very small differences. This questions the emphasis given in recent years to the use of 'realistic' source data for accurate electron beam dosimetry.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15509075     DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/49/18/016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  5 in total

1.  Extraction of depth-dependent perturbation factors for parallel-plate chambers in electron beams using a plastic scintillation detector.

Authors:  Frédéric Lacroix; Mathieu Guillot; Malcolm McEwen; Claudiu Cojocaru; Luc Gingras; A Sam Beddar; Luc Beaulieu
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Electron stopping power and inelastic mean free path in amino acids and protein over the energy range of 20-20,000 eV.

Authors:  Zhenyu Tan; Yueyuan Xia; Mingwen Zhao; Xiangdong Liu
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2006-05-30       Impact factor: 1.925

3.  A GPU-accelerated Monte Carlo dose calculation platform and its application toward validating an MRI-guided radiation therapy beam model.

Authors:  Yuhe Wang; Thomas R Mazur; Olga Green; Yanle Hu; Hua Li; Vivian Rodriguez; H Omar Wooten; Deshan Yang; Tianyu Zhao; Sasa Mutic; H Harold Li
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 4.  Monte Carlo simulations in radiotherapy dosimetry.

Authors:  Pedro Andreo
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2018-06-27       Impact factor: 3.481

5.  Comparison of penh, fluka, and Geant4/topas for absorbed dose calculations in air cavities representing ionization chambers in high-energy photon and proton beams.

Authors:  Kilian-Simon Baumann; Felix Horst; Klemens Zink; Carles Gomà
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2019-08-19       Impact factor: 4.071

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.