Literature DB >> 15508085

Yttrium-90 microspheres for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma.

Jean Francois H Geschwind1, Riad Salem, Brian I Carr, Michael C Soulen, Kenneth G Thurston, Kathleen A Goin, Mark Van Buskirk, Carol A Roberts, James E Goin.   

Abstract

Unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma is extremely difficult to treat. TheraSphere consists of yttrium-90 (a pure beta emitter) microspheres, which are injected into the hepatic arteries. This article reviews the safety and survival of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma who were treated with yttrium-90 microspheres. Eighty patients were selected from a database of 108 yttrium-90 microsphere-treated patients and were staged by using Child-Pugh, Okuda, and Cancer of the Liver Italian Program scoring systems. Patients were treated with local, regional, and whole-liver approaches. Survival from first treatment was analyzed with Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression methods. Adverse events and complications of treatment were coded by using the Southwest Oncology Group toxicity scoring system. Patients received liver doses ranging from 47 to 270 Gy. Thirty-two patients (40%) received more than 1 treatment. Survival correlated with pretreatment Cancer of the Liver Italian Program scores ( P = .002), as well as with the individual Cancer of the Liver Italian Program components, Child-Pugh class, alpha-fetoprotein levels, and percentage of tumor replacement. Patients classified as Okuda stage I (n = 54) and II (n = 26) had median survival durations and 1-year survival rates of 628 days and 63%, and 384 days and 51%, respectively ( P = .02). One patient died of liver failure judged as possibly related to treatment. Thus, in selected patients with hepatocellular carcinoma, yttrium-90 microsphere treatment is safe and well tolerated. On the basis of these results, a randomized controlled trial is warranted comparing yttrium-90 microsphere treatment with transarterial chemoembolization by using the Cancer of the Liver Italian Program system for prospective stratified randomization.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15508085     DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2004.09.034

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastroenterology        ISSN: 0016-5085            Impact factor:   22.682


  76 in total

Review 1.  Chemoembolization and radioembolization for metastatic disease to the liver: available data and future studies.

Authors:  Khairuddin Memon; Robert J Lewandowski; Ahsun Riaz; Riad Salem
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2012-09

2.  EANM procedure guideline for the treatment of liver cancer and liver metastases with intra-arterial radioactive compounds.

Authors:  Francesco Giammarile; Lisa Bodei; Carlo Chiesa; Glenn Flux; Flavio Forrer; Françoise Kraeber-Bodere; Boudewijn Brans; Bieke Lambert; Mark Konijnenberg; Françoise Borson-Chazot; Jan Tennvall; Markus Luster
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 3.  Hepatocellular carcinoma: therapy and prevention.

Authors:  Hubert E Blum
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2005-12-21       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  Radioembolization results in longer time-to-progression and reduced toxicity compared with chemoembolization in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Riad Salem; Robert J Lewandowski; Laura Kulik; Edward Wang; Ahsun Riaz; Robert K Ryu; Kent T Sato; Ramona Gupta; Paul Nikolaidis; Frank H Miller; Vahid Yaghmai; Saad M Ibrahim; Seanthan Senthilnathan; Talia Baker; Vanessa L Gates; Bassel Atassi; Steven Newman; Khairuddin Memon; Richard Chen; Robert L Vogelzang; Albert A Nemcek; Scott A Resnick; Howard B Chrisman; James Carr; Reed A Omary; Michael Abecassis; Al B Benson; Mary F Mulcahy
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2010-10-30       Impact factor: 22.682

5.  Radioembolization of yttrium-90 microspheres for hepatic malignancy.

Authors:  Ravi Murthy; Paresh Kamat; Rodolfo Nuñez; Riad Salem
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 1.513

6.  Efficacy and safety of transarterial radioembolization versus chemoembolization in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Laura E Moreno-Luna; Ju Dong Yang; William Sanchez; Ricardo Paz-Fumagalli; Denise M Harnois; Teresa A Mettler; Denise N Gansen; Piet C de Groen; Konstantinos N Lazaridis; K V Narayanan Menon; Nicholas F Larusso; Steven R Alberts; Gregory J Gores; Chad J Fleming; Seth W Slettedahl; William S Harmsen; Terry M Therneau; Gregory A Wiseman; James C Andrews; Lewis R Roberts
Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol       Date:  2012-10-24       Impact factor: 2.740

Review 7.  Management of hepatocellular cancer.

Authors:  Mary F Mulcahy
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2005-09

Review 8.  Liver embolizations in oncology. A review. Part II. Arterial radioembolizations, portal venous embolizations, experimental arterial embolization procedures.

Authors:  Peter Gunvén
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 3.064

Review 9.  Radioembolization with Yttrium-90 microspheres in hepatocellular carcinoma: Role and perspectives.

Authors:  Cristina Mosconi; Alberta Cappelli; Cinzia Pettinato; Rita Golfieri
Journal:  World J Hepatol       Date:  2015-04-18

10.  Yttrium-90 microsphere radioembolization for the treatment of liver malignancies: a structured meta-analysis.

Authors:  M A D Vente; M Wondergem; I van der Tweel; M A A J van den Bosch; B A Zonnenberg; M G E H Lam; A D van Het Schip; J F W Nijsen
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2008-11-07       Impact factor: 5.315

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.