Literature DB >> 1550652

Arthroscopic resection of the outer end of the clavicle from a superior approach: a critical, quantitative, radiographic assessment of bone removal.

E L Flatow1, F A Cordasco, L U Bigliani.   

Abstract

The technique of arthroscopic resection of the outer end of the clavicle through a superior approach is evaluated to determine whether adequate bone removal can be achieved. Furthermore, the results are compared with open resection. Twelve patients with osteolysis of the outer end of the clavicle refractory to conservative treatment underwent resection: six open and six arthroscopically through a superior approach. The distances from the acromial side of the AC joint to the lateral edge of the clavicle at its superior and inferior cortices were measured before and after surgery on anteroposterior radiographs. Bone removal was assessed by the difference between pre- and postoperative measurements. Satisfactory bone removal was possible arthroscopically and averaged 17 mm. This compared favorably with 18-mm average bone removal in the open group. Comparable pain relief and function were achieved in both groups. However, pain relief was achieved on average 3.4 months earlier in the arthroscopic group. Hospital stay was significantly shortened because the arthroscopic resections were outpatient procedures, whereas the open procedures had an average hospital stay of 3 days.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1550652     DOI: 10.1016/0749-8063(92)90136-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arthroscopy        ISSN: 0749-8063            Impact factor:   4.772


  11 in total

Review 1.  Direct arthroscopic distal clavicle resection: a technical review.

Authors:  Gregory N Lervick
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2005

2.  Complications after open distal clavicle excision.

Authors:  Efstathis Chronopoulos; Harpreet S Gill; Michael T Freehill; Steve A Petersen; Edward G McFarland
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-02-10       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 3.  [Arthroscopic resection of the acromioclavicular joint].

Authors:  R Lenz; P C Kreuz; T Tischer
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2014-06-14       Impact factor: 1.154

4.  Comparison between open and arthroscopic procedures for lateral clavicle resection.

Authors:  Nick Duindam; Jesse W P Kuiper; Marco J M Hoozemans; Bart J Burger
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-11-10       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Acromioclavicular joint injuries.

Authors:  G M Beim
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 2.860

6.  Influence of disruption of the acromioclavicular and coracoclavicular ligaments on glenohumeral motion: a kinematic evaluation.

Authors:  Kempland C Walley; Babak Haghpanah; Andreas Hingsammer; Ethan R Harlow; Ashkan Vaziri; Joseph P DeAngelis; Ara Nazarian; Arun J Ramappa
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2016-11-17       Impact factor: 2.362

7.  Arthroscopic distal clavicle excision is associated with fewer postoperative complications than open.

Authors:  Enrico M Forlenza; Joshua Wright-Chisem; Matthew R Cohn; John M Apostolakos; Avinesh Agarwalla; Michael C Fu; Samuel A Taylor; Lawrence V Gulotta; Joshua S Dines
Journal:  JSES Int       Date:  2021-07-14

8.  Arthroscopic resection of the distal clavicle in osteoarthritis of the acromioclavicular joint.

Authors:  Tae-Soo Park; Kwang-Won Lee
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2016 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.251

9.  Effect of pain scrambler therapy on shoulder joint pain and range of motion in patients who had undergone arthroscopic rotator cuff repair for the first time.

Authors:  Dong-Kyu Lee; Eun-Kyung Kim
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2016-07-29

10.  Bipolar Acromioclavicular Joint Resection.

Authors:  Julien Gaillard; Michel Calò; Geoffroy Nourissat
Journal:  Arthrosc Tech       Date:  2017-11-20
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.