Literature DB >> 15505626

Phase II study of S-1 in patients with advanced biliary tract cancer.

H Ueno1, T Okusaka, M Ikeda, Y Takezako, C Morizane.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of an oral fluoropyrimidine derivative, S-1, in patients with advanced biliary tract cancer. Patients with pathologically confirmed advanced biliary tract cancer, a measurable lesion, and no history of radiotherapy or chemotherapy were enrolled. S-1 was administered orally (40 mg m(-2) b.i.d.) for 28 days, followed by a 14-day rest period. A pharmacokinetic study was performed on day 1 in the initial eight patients. In all, 19 consecutive eligible patients were enrolled in the study between July 2000 and January 2002. The site of the primary tumour was the gallbladder (n=16), the extrahepatic bile ducts (n=2), and the ampulla of Vater (n=1). A median of two courses of treatment (range, 1-12) was administered. Four patients achieved a partial response, giving an overall response rate of 21.1%. The median time-to-progression and median overall survival period were 3.7 and 8.3 months, respectively. Although grade 3 anorexia and fatigue occurred in two patients each (10.5%), no grade 4 toxicities were observed. The pharmacokinetic parameters after a single oral administration of S-1 were similar to those of patients with other cancers. S-1 exhibits definite antitumour activity and is well tolerated in patients with advanced biliary tract cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15505626      PMCID: PMC2410053          DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6602208

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Cancer        ISSN: 0007-0920            Impact factor:   7.640


The incidence of biliary tract cancer has been steadily increasing in Japan over the past several decades (Okusaka, 2002). Currently, biliary tract cancer is the sixth leading cause of death from cancer in Japan, with statistics from 2002 indicating a total of about 16 000 deaths from this disease. As a result of the lack of characteristic early symptoms, biliary tract cancers are often diagnosed at an advanced stage, and the prognosis of patients with advanced biliary tract cancer is dismal. Although systemic treatment is used for advanced disease, the impact of existing chemotherapy is virtually negligible. A large number of agents, including 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), mitomycin-C, and cisplatin, have been tested as single agents or in combination therapies without appreciable efficacy (Hejna ; van Riel ; Yee ). Although recent clinical studies have suggested the potential activity of gemcitabine for the treatment of biliary tract cancer, producing response rates of 8 to 36% (Mezger ; Raderer ; Gallardo ; Gebbia ; Kubicka ; Penz ; Tsavaris ), studies on a larger scale are needed to confirm its efficacy. In any case, to improve the prognosis of patients with biliary tract cancer, a clear need exists for new, effective chemotherapeutic agents. S-1 is a novel orally administered drug that is a combination of tegafur (FT), 5-chloro-2,4-dihydroxypyridine (CDHP), and oteracil potassium (Oxo) in a 1 : 0.4 : 1 molar concentration ratio (Shirasaka ). 5-chloro-2,4-dihydroxypyridine is a competitive inhibitor of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase, which is involved in the degradation of 5-FU, and acts to maintain efficacious concentrations of 5-FU in plasma and tumour tissues (Tatsumi ). Oteracil potassium, a competitive inhibitor of orotate phosphoribosyltransferase, inhibits the phosphorylation of 5-FU in the gastrointestinal tract, reducing the serious gastrointestinal toxicity associated with 5-FU (Shirasaka ). S-1 therapy in athymic nude rats was associated with the retention of a higher and more prolonged concentration of 5-FU in plasma and tumour tissues, when compared with UFT (Shirasaka ). The antitumour effect of S-1 has been already demonstrated in a variety of solid tumours: the response rates for advanced gastric cancer (Sakata ; Koizumi ), colorectal cancer (Ohtsu ), non-small-cell lung cancer (Kawahara ), and head and neck cancer (Inuyama ) in the late phase II studies conducted in Japan were 44–49, 35, 22, and 29%, respectively. In addition, a recent early phase II study for advanced pancreatic cancer demonstrated a response rate of 21% in 19 patients (Okada ). The efficacy of S-1 for the treatment of gastrointestinal cancer has also been reported in European patients: the response rates for advanced gastric cancer (Chollet ) and colorectal cancer (Van den Brande ) were 32 and 24%, respectively. However, no previous reports have described the efficacy and safety of S-1 for the treatment of biliary tract cancer. Consequently, the present early phase II study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of S-1 in patients with advanced biliary tract cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients

Patients were required to meet the following eligibility criteria: histologically or cytologically confirmed advanced biliary tract cancer; at least one measurable lesion; no history of prior antitumour treatment except resection; a Karnofsky performance status (KPS) of 80–100 points; age of 20–74 years; an estimated life expectancy of at least 2 months; adequate organ function, defined as a white blood cell count of 4000–12 000 mm−3, a platelet count ⩾100 000 mm−3, a haemoglobin level ⩾10.0 g/dl, a normal serum creatinine level, a serum total bilirubin level ⩽3 times the upper limit of normal, an aspartate aminotransferase and alanine aminotransferase level ⩽2.5 times the upper limits of normal; and written informed consent. Patients who had obstructive jaundice were considered eligible if their bilirubin level could be reduced to within 3 times the upper limit of normal after biliary drainage. The exclusion criteria were as follows: a history of drug hypersensitivity; severe complications, such as infection, heart disease, and renal disease; symptomatic metastasis of the central nervous system; active concomitant malignancy; marked pleural effusion or ascites; watery diarrhoea; and pregnancy or lactation. This study was approved by the institutional review board at the National Cancer Center and conducted in accordance with the Good Clinical Practice guidelines of Japan.

Treatments

S-1 was administered orally at a dose of 40 mg m−2 twice daily after breakfast and dinner. Three initial doses were established according to the body surface area (BSA) as follows: BSA <1.25 m2, 80 mg day−1; 1.25 m2⩽BSA<1.50 m2, 100 mg day−1; and 1.50 m2⩽BSA, 120 mg day−1. S-1 was administered at the respective dose for 28 days, followed by a 14-day rest period; this treatment course was repeated until the occurrence of disease progression, unacceptable toxicities, or the patient's refusal to continue. When a grade 3 or greater haematologic or grade 2 or greater nonhaeamatologic toxicity occurred, the temporary interruption of the S-1 administrations was allowed until the toxicity subsided to grade 1 or less. If the daily dose of S-1 was considered to be intolerable, the retreatment dose was reduced by 20 mg day−1 (minimum dose, 80 mg day−1). If no toxicity occurred, the rest period shortened to 7 days was allowed. If a rest period of more than 28 days was required because of toxicity, the patient was withdrawn from the study. Patients were not allowed to receive concomitant radiation therapy, chemotherapy, or hormonal therapy during the study. Patients maintained a daily journal to record their intake of S-1 and any signs or symptoms that they experienced. S-1 was provided by Taiho Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd (Tokyo, Japan).

Response and toxicity evaluation

The response after each course was assessed according to the Japan Society for Cancer Therapy Criteria (Japan Society for Cancer Therapy, 1993), which is similar to the World Health Organization Criteria. Briefly, a complete response (CR) was defined as the disappearance of all clinical evidence of the tumour for a minimum of 4 weeks. A partial response (PR) was defined as a 50% or greater reduction in the sum of the products of two perpendicular diameters of all measurable lesions for a minimum of 4 weeks. No change (NC) was defined as a reduction of less than 50% or a less than 25% increase in the sum of the products of two perpendicular diameters of all lesions for a minimum of 4 weeks. Progressive disease (PD) was defined as an increase of 25% or more in the sum of the products of two perpendicular diameters of all lesions, the appearance of any new lesion, or a deterioration in the clinical status that was consistent with disease progression. Primary bile duct lesions were not considered to be measurable lesions because the dimensions of such lesions are difficult to measure accurately. The response duration was calculated from the day of the first sign of a response until disease progression; time-to-progression (TTP) was calculated from the date of study entry until documented disease progression; and overall survival time was calculated from the date of study entry to the date of death or the last follow-up. The median probability of the survival period and the median TTP were estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method. Compliance was calculated for all treatment courses using the ratio of the total dose actually administered to the scheduled dose. Physical examinations, complete blood cell counts, biochemistry tests, and urinalyses were performed at least biweekly. Adverse events were evaluated according to the National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria, version 2.0. Objective responses and adverse events were confirmed by an external review committee. Analysis was to be performed when 19 patients were enrolled. In this study, the threshold rate was defined as 5% and the expected rate was set as 15%. If the lower limit of the 90% confidence interval exceeded the 5% threshold (objective response in four or more of the 19 patients), S-1 was judged to be effective and we would proceed to the next large-scale study. If the upper limit of the 90% confidence interval did not exceed the expected rate of 15% (no objective response in the 19 patients), S-1 was judged to be ineffective and the study was to be ended. If response was confirmed in 1–3 of the 19 patients, whether to proceed to the next study or not was judged based on the safety and survival data from the present study.

Pharmacokinetics

A pharmacokinetic study was performed in the first eight patients enrolled in the study. Blood (5 ml) was collected before and 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12 h after the administration of S-1 on day 1 of the first course. The plasma was then separated by centrifugation and stored at −20°C until analysis. Plasma concentrations of FT were quantified using high-performance liquid chromatography with UV detection, and the concentrations of 5-FU, CDHP, and Oxo were quantified using gas chromatography-negative ion chemical ionisation mass spectrometry, as reported previously (Matsushima ). Pharmacokinetic parameters, including the maximum plasma concentration (Cmax, ng ml−1), time to reach Cmax (Tmax, h), area under the concentration vs time curve for zero to infinity (AUC0–∞, ng h ml−1), and the elimination half-life (T1/2, h) were calculated using a noncompartment model and Win-Nonlin software, Version 3.1 (Pharsight, Apex, NC, USA).

RESULTS

Nineteen consecutive eligible patients with advanced biliary tract cancer were enrolled in the study between July 2000 and January 2002 at the National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan. The patient characteristics are summarised in Table 1 . Before the start of the study, six patients had received surgical resection and seven patients had undergone percutaneous or endoscopic biliary drainage for obstructive jaundice. Of the 19 patients, 17 had metastatic disease at the time of their enrollment in the study, while two patients were diagnosed as having locally advanced disease. The liver was the most common site of metastases (14 patients), followed by the distant lymph nodes (11 patients) and the lungs (three patients).
Table 1

Patient characteristics (n=19)

Characteristics No. of patients (%)
Gender  
 Male 12 (63.2)
 Female 7 (36.8)
Median age (years) (range)59 (44–71) 
   
Karnofsky performance status, points  
 100 8 (42.1)
  90 10 (52.6)
  80 1 (5.3)
Median body surface area (m2) (range)1.56 (1.37–1.83) 
Median first dose (mg m−2 day−1) (range)72.9 (65.8–78.6) 
History of surgical resection 6 (31.6)
   
Primary tumour site  
 Gallbladder 16 (84.2)
 Extrahepatic bile ducts 2 (10.5)
 Ampulla of Vater 1 (5.3)
Median CEA (ng ml−1) (range)6.8 (1–737) 
Median CA 19-9 (U ml−1) (range)103 (1–48,160) 
In all, 19 patients were given a total of 63 courses of chemotherapy, with a median of two courses each (range, 1–12). The initial administered dose of S-1 was 100 mg day−1 in seven patients and 120 mg day−1 in 12 patients. Dose reduction was required in one patient because of grade 2 diarrhoea after the third course of treatment. The reasons for treatment discontinuation were as follows: disease progression (16 patients), grade 3 diarrhoea and grade 3 stomatitis (one patient), prolonged grade 2 nausea (one patient), and patient's request for transference to another hospital (one patient). Except for two patients, in whom treatment was abandoned because of toxicities, all the patients were treated as outpatients. The overall compliance rate was 94.3%.

Response and survival

Of the 19 patients, none of the patients showed a CR but four patients achieved a PR, giving an overall response rate of 21.1% (95% confidence interval, 6.1–45.6%) (Table 2 ). The median response duration was 6.7 months (range, 2.8–10.0 months). Nine patients showed NC and five patients had PD. The tumour response could not be evaluated in one patient because the patient was transferred to another hospital, for personal reasons, prior to the response evaluation. At the time of analysis, 18 of the 19 patients had died because of disease progression. The median TTP was 3.7 months, and the overall median survival time was 8.3 months, with a 1-year survival rate of 21.1% (Figure 1).
Table 2

Response results (n=19)

 TotalCRPRNCPDNEResponse rate (%)
Overall190495121.1
        
Primary tumour site       
 Gallbladder160384118.8
 Extrahepatic bile ducts2001100
 Ampulla of Vater101000100.0

CR=Complete response; PR=partial response; NC=no change; PD=progressive disease; NE=not evaluable.

Figure 1

Time to progression (A) and overall survival time (B).

CR=Complete response; PR=partial response; NC=no change; PD=progressive disease; NE=not evaluable. Time to progression (A) and overall survival time (B).

Toxicity

All 19 patients were assessed for toxicities that are listed in Table 3 . Treatment was generally well tolerated throughout the study. Although haematologic and gastrointestinal toxicities were common, most of the toxicities were mild and transient. Grade 3 anorexia and fatigue occurred in two patients each (10.5%), and grade 3 anaemia, neutropenia, stomatitis, nausea, diarrhoea, and fever occurred in one patient each (5.3%). No signs of cumulative toxicity were noted. Of the 17 patients who were treated as outpatients, one patient required hospitalisation because of grade 3 nausea, anorexia, and fatigue during the middle of the first course of treatment. Although one patient died within 8 weeks of study enrollment because of rapid disease progression, no treatment-related deaths were observed.
Table 3

Treatment-related adverse events (n=19): worst grade reported during treatment period

 Gradea
  
Toxicity1234Grade 1–4 (%)Grade 3–4 (%)
Haematologic      
 Leukopenia530042.10
 Neutropenia421036.85.3
 Anaemia341042.15.3
 Thrombocytopenia200010.50
       
Nonhaematologic      
 Nausea421036.85.3
 Vomiting400021.10
 Anorexia302026.310.5
 Stomatitis301021.15.3
 Diarrhoea221026.35.3
 Total bilirubin110010.50
 ALT240031.60
 AST420031.60
 Fatigue002010.510.5
 Fever00105.35.3
 Rash10005.30
 Pigmentation changes300015.80

AST=aspartate aminotransferase; ALT=alanine aminotransferase.

NCI Common Toxicity Criteria, version 2.0.

AST=aspartate aminotransferase; ALT=alanine aminotransferase. NCI Common Toxicity Criteria, version 2.0. Table 4 and Figure 2 show the results of the pharmacokinetic study for S-1 in the current study. The pharmacokinetic parameters for S-1 in other cancers, as reported by Hirata are also shown in Table 4 and Figure 2 for reference. Hirata et al investigated the pharmacokinetic parameters after the single administration of S-1 at a dose of 40 mg m−2 in 12 Japanese patients with gastric, colorectal, and breast cancer. The parameters of 5-FU in both studies were similar, and no large differences in the parameters of other compounds, including CDHP, were seen.
Table 4

Pharmacokinetic parameters after single administration of S-1 at a dose of 40 mg m−2

CompoundParameterCurrent study (n=8)Hirata's study (n=12)
FTCmax (ng ml−1)1721.6±400.41971.0±269.0
 Tmax (h)3.6±1.12.4±1.2
 AUC (ng h ml−1)24643.0±7915.0a28216.9±7771.4b
 T1/2 (h)8.2±2.013.1±3.1
    
5-FUCmax (ng ml−1)146.9±62.1128.5±41.5
 Tmax (h)4.0±0.03.5±1.7
 AUC (ng h ml−1)799.8±285.3a723.9±272.7c
 T1/2 (h)1.9±0.31.9±0.4
    
CDHPCmax (ng ml−1)245.3±64.9284.6±116.6
 Tmax (h)3.3±1.02.1±1.2
 AUC (ng h ml−1)1472.6±381.6a1372.2±573.7b
 T1/2 (h)3.2±0.73.0±0.5
    
OxoCmax (ng ml−1)55.3±48.478.0±58.2
 Tmax (h)3.3±1.02.3±1.1
 AUC (ng h ml−1)230.6±140.2a365.7±248.6d
 T1/2 (h)2.8±0.63.0±1.4

Parameters are represented as mean±s.d.

AUC0–∞.

AUC0–48.

AUC0–14.

AUC0–24.

FT=tegafur; 5-FU=5-fluorouracil; CDHP=5-chloro-2,4-dihydroxypyridine; Oxo=oteracil potassium.

Figure 2

Plasma concentration–time profiles of FT (•), 5-FU (▪), CDHP (○), and Oxo (□) after administration of S-1. The values are expressed as the mean±s.d.

Parameters are represented as mean±s.d. AUC0–∞. AUC0–48. AUC0–14. AUC0–24. FT=tegafur; 5-FU=5-fluorouracil; CDHP=5-chloro-2,4-dihydroxypyridine; Oxo=oteracil potassium. Plasma concentration–time profiles of FT (•), 5-FU (▪), CDHP (○), and Oxo (□) after administration of S-1. The values are expressed as the mean±s.d.

DISCUSSION

Although most patients with biliary tract cancer have an unresectable disease at the time of diagnosis, no standard chemotherapies have been established for this disease (Hejna ; van Riel ; Okusaka, 2002; Yee ). Since biliary tract cancer is an uncommon disease, studies of chemotherapy for biliary tract cancer are relatively few, and the number of included patients is generally small. In addition, the response rates and survival times described in published studies are difficult to compare because most studies contain patients with heterogeneous tumour groups, such as intrahepatic or extrahepatic bile duct cancer and gallbladder cancer. 5-fluorouracil has been the most commonly studied drug for this disease, although the antitumour effect of single-agent 5-FU is limited, with a response rate of less than 20%. Although the combined use of 5-FU with other agents, such as leucovorin, mitomycin C, or cisplatin, often produces a response rate of over 20% (Polyzos ; Ducreux ; Taïeb ), the toxicities also become greater; whether combination therapies contribute to prolonged survival remains uncertain. In recent small-scale studies, gemcitabine has shown relatively good response rates, ranging from 8 to 36%, for biliary tract cancer (Mezger ; Raderer ; Gallardo ; Gebbia ; Kubicka ; Penz ; Tsavaris ), but large-scale studies are needed to confirm its efficacy. Therefore, the development of new effective chemotherapeutic agents is urgently needed to improve survival in patients with advanced biliary tract cancers. A novel orally administered drug, S-1, has been developed based on the biochemical modulations by CDHP, a dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase inhibitor, and Oxo, a protector against 5-FU-induced gastrointestinal toxicity; S-1 has exhibited significant antitumour effects on various solid cancers (Sakata ; Koizumi ; Ohtsu ; Inuyama ; Kawahara ; Chollet ; Van den Brande ). Since the drug is available in oral form, S-1 has a potential advantage, as far as patient convenience is concerned, especially in terms of quality-of-life. This consideration is very important for biliary tract cancer patients because their remaining lifespan is generally short. Consequently, the efficacy of S-1 for the treatment of biliary tract cancer was examined. In the current study, S-1 produced a good response rate of 21.1%, which is superior to those obtained with other single agents, including 5-FU, mitomycin C, and cisplatin (Table 5 ), suggesting an antitumour effect of S-1 on biliary tract cancer. In this study, patients with gallbladder cancer accounted for three of the four responders; however, the efficacy of S-1 for each primary tumour site cannot be accurately assessed because of the small number of subjects analysed.
Table 5

Recent studies of single-agent chemotherapy for biliary tract cancer

  No. of patients
  
AuthorRegimenTotalGallbladder Ca.Response rate (%)MST (months)
Takada et al (1994)5-FU18100NA
Taal et al (1993)Mitomycin C3013104.5
Okada et al (1994)Cisplatin13685.5
Jones et al (1996)Paclitaxel1540NA
Pazdur et al (1999)Docetaxel1700NA
Papakostas et al (2001)Docetaxel2516208
Sanz-Altamira et al (2001)Irinotecan2510810
Mezger et al (1998)Gemcitabine1348NA
Raderer et al (1999)Gemcitabine195166.5
Penz et al (2001)Gemcitabinea32102211.5
Kubicka et al (2001)Gemcitabine230309.3
Gallardo et al (2001)Gemcitabine2626367
Gebbia et al (2001)Gemcitabine1812228
Tsavaris et al (2004)Gemcitabine30143014
Current studyS-11916218.3

5-FU: 5-fluorouracil; MST: median survival time; NA: not available.

Biweekly.

5-FU: 5-fluorouracil; MST: median survival time; NA: not available. Biweekly. Since patients with biliary tract cancer tend to suffer various tumour-related complications, such as cholangitis and impaired liver function, enhanced chemotherapy-related toxicities, including neutropenic sepsis, are a concern. However, S-1 was well tolerated in the present study, and no grade 4 toxicities occurred. Haematological toxicities were acceptable and similar to the results of clinical studies examining S-1 for the treatment of other cancers in Japan. Gastrointestinal toxicities were also well tolerated, as in the other Japanese studies, although strong gastrointestinal toxicities, particularly severe diarrhoea, have been reported in Western countries (van Groeningen ; Cohen ; Chollet ; Van den Brande ). The difference in toxicities between the Japanese and Western studies remains unexplained, although the conversion of FT to 5-FU seems to occur more slowly in Japanese patients than in patients from other ethnic groups (Comets ). A pharmacokinetic study suggested that the pharmacokinetic parameters of S-1 were similar in patients with biliary tract cancer and in patients with other cancers in Japan. Since no serious adverse events occurred in this study, most of the patients were treated as outpatients, enabling a relatively good quality-of-life. The S-1 compliance rate of the patients was very good (94.3%), with only one patient requiring a dose reduction and only two patients discontinuing S-1 because of toxicity. In view of the favourable toxicity profile, its evaluation in combination with other agents might be of particular interest to improve therapeutic results. Combination therapy with S-1 and cisplatin has already been conducted for gastric cancer, and an excellent response rate of 76% was reported in a phase II study (Ohtsu ). In conclusion, the results of this study indicate that S-1 is a safe and active agent for the treatment of patients with biliary tract cancer. Further investigations of this agent are warranted in this population of patients with a poor prognosis.
  36 in total

1.  Phase II study of systemic gemcitabine chemotherapy for advanced unresectable hepatobiliary carcinomas.

Authors:  S Kubicka; K L Rudolph; M K Tietze; M Lorenz; M Manns
Journal:  Hepatogastroenterology       Date:  2001 May-Jun

2.  First-line chemotherapy with docetaxel for unresectable or metastatic carcinoma of the biliary tract. A multicentre phase II study.

Authors:  P Papakostas; C Kouroussis; N Androulakis; G Samelis; G Aravantinos; K Kalbakis; E Sarra; J Souglakos; S Kakolyris; V Georgoulias
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 9.162

3.  Development of a novel form of an oral 5-fluorouracil derivative (S-1) directed to the potentiation of the tumor selective cytotoxicity of 5-fluorouracil by two biochemical modulators.

Authors:  T Shirasaka; Y Shimamato; H Ohshimo; M Yamaguchi; T Kato; K Yonekura; M Fukushima
Journal:  Anticancer Drugs       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 2.248

Review 4.  Cancers of the gallbladder and biliary ducts.

Authors:  Kevin Yee; Brett C Sheppard; John Domreis; Charles D Blanke
Journal:  Oncology (Williston Park)       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 2.990

5.  Inhibition by oxonic acid of gastrointestinal toxicity of 5-fluorouracil without loss of its antitumor activity in rats.

Authors:  T Shirasaka; Y Shimamoto; M Fukushima
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1993-09-01       Impact factor: 12.701

6.  Phase II trial of mitomycin C (MMC) in advanced gallbladder and biliary tree carcinoma. An EORTC Gastrointestinal Tract Cancer Cooperative Group Study.

Authors:  B G Taal; R A Audisio; H Bleiberg; G H Blijham; J P Neijt; C H Veenhof; N Duez; T Sahmoud
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 32.976

Review 7.  The role of chemotherapy and radiation in the management of biliary cancer: a review of the literature.

Authors:  M Hejna; M Pruckmayer; M Raderer
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 9.162

8.  Weekly gemcitabine for the treatment of biliary tract and gallbladder cancer.

Authors:  Nikolas Tsavaris; Christos Kosmas; Panagiotis Gouveris; Kostadinos Gennatas; Aris Polyzos; Despina Mouratidou; Heracles Tsipras; Helias Margaris; George Papastratis; Evanthia Tzima; Nikitas Papadoniou; Gavrilos Karatzas; Efstathios Papalambros
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 3.850

9.  Effective treatment of advanced biliary tract carcinoma using 5-fluorouracil continuous infusion with cisplatin.

Authors:  M Ducreux; P Rougier; A Fandi; M C Clavero-Fabri; A L Villing; F Fassone; L Fandi; J Zarba; J P Armand
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 32.976

10.  EORTC Early Clinical Studies Group early phase II trial of S-1 in patients with advanced or metastatic colorectal cancer.

Authors:  J Van den Brande; P Schöffski; J H M Schellens; A D Roth; F Duffaud; K Weigang-Köhler; F Reinke; J Wanders; R F de Boer; J B Vermorken; P Fumoleau
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2003-03-10       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  48 in total

1.  Multicenter phase II study of S-1 monotherapy as second-line chemotherapy for advanced biliary tract cancer refractory to gemcitabine.

Authors:  Takashi Sasaki; Hiroyuki Isayama; Yousuke Nakai; Suguru Mizuno; Keisuke Yamamoto; Hiroshi Yagioka; Yoko Yashima; Kazumichi Kawakubo; Hirofumi Kogure; Osamu Togawa; Saburo Matsubara; Yukiko Ito; Naoki Sasahira; Kenji Hirano; Takeshi Tsujino; Nobuo Toda; Minoru Tada; Masao Omata; Kazuhiko Koike
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  2010-10-06       Impact factor: 3.850

2.  Prognostic factors of patients with advanced gallbladder carcinoma following aggressive surgical resection.

Authors:  Yoshiaki Murakami; Kenichiro Uemura; Takeshi Sudo; Yasushi Hashimoto; Akira Nakashima; Naru Kondo; Ryutaro Sakabe; Hironori Kobayashi; Taijiro Sueda
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2011-03-10       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  Surgical procedure and long-term survival of hilar cholangiocarcinoma.

Authors:  Yue Wang; Helen Yang; Chunjian Shen; Ji Luo
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-01-15

4.  Improvement of prognosis for unresectable biliary tract cancer.

Authors:  Takashi Sasaki; Hiroyuki Isayama; Yousuke Nakai; Naminatsu Takahara; Naoki Sasahira; Hirofumi Kogure; Suguru Mizuno; Hiroshi Yagioka; Yukiko Ito; Natsuyo Yamamoto; Kenji Hirano; Nobuo Toda; Minoru Tada; Masao Omata; Kazuhiko Koike
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-01-07       Impact factor: 5.742

5.  Multidisciplinary collaboration in gallbladder carcinoma treatment: A case report and literature review.

Authors:  Zheng-Yun Zou; Jing Yan; Yu-Zheng Zhuge; Jun Chen; Xiao-Ping Qian; Bao-Rui Liu
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2016-08-16       Impact factor: 2.967

6.  Effects of S-1 as a second-line chemotherapy for patients with relapsed pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Keinosuke Ishido; Yoshikazu Toyoki; Daisuke Kudo; Norihisa Kimura; Daisuke Yamana; Takuya Miura; Shinji Tsutsumi; Takahiro Muroya; Toru Yoshikawa; Hiroshi Ogasawara; Shinnosuke Yonaiyama; Shunji Narumi; Kenichi Hakamada
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2011-09-05       Impact factor: 2.967

7.  Immunohistochemical Examination of a Resected Advanced Hilar Cholangiocarcinoma Arising in a 29-Year-Old Male without Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis.

Authors:  Taketoshi Suehiro; Takashi Matsumata; Tomohiro Iguchi; Kensaku Sanefuji; Ken-Ichi Nomoto; Akinobu Taketomi; Ken Shirabe; Yoshihiko Maehara
Journal:  Case Rep Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-05-12

8.  Gemcitabine-based versus fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy with or without platinum in unresectable biliary tract cancer: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Mi-Jung Kim; Do-Youn Oh; Se-Hoon Lee; Dong-Wan Kim; Seock-Ah Im; Tae-You Kim; Dae Seog Heo; Yung-Jue Bang
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2008-12-18       Impact factor: 4.430

9.  Guidelines for chemotherapy of biliary tract and ampullary carcinomas.

Authors:  Junji Furuse; Tadahiro Takada; Masaru Miyazaki; Shuichi Miyakawa; Kazuhiro Tsukada; Masato Nagino; Satoshi Kondo; Hiroya Saito; Toshio Tsuyuguchi; Koichi Hirata; Fumio Kimura; Hideyuki Yoshitomi; Satoshi Nozawa; Masahiro Yoshida; Keita Wada; Hodaka Amano; Fumihiko Miura
Journal:  J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg       Date:  2008-02-16

10.  Adjuvant concurrent chemoradiation therapy (CCRT) alone versus CCRT followed by adjuvant chemotherapy: which is better in patients with radically resected extrahepatic biliary tract cancer?: a non-randomized, single center study.

Authors:  Kyu-Hyoung Lim; Do-Youn Oh; Eui Kyu Chie; Jin-Young Jang; Seock-Ah Im; Tae-You Kim; Sun-Whe Kim; Sung Whan Ha; Yung-Jue Bang
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2009-09-27       Impact factor: 4.430

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.