Evaluation of periapical lesion healing by correction of gray values.

The purpose of this study was to compare two methods for evaluating periapical healing in humans: the periapical index (PAI) and a gray value correction method. Fifty human teeth with a periapical lesion were endodontically treated. Radiographs, with a special aluminum device, were taken postoperatively, after 3 months and after 6 months. The PAI was recorded at each period of time, and a Kruskall and Wallis test was performed to compare the three groups. After scanning, the size of the lesion and its gray value were recorded. The aluminum device allowed the gray values to be equalized. An analysis of variance followed by a Duncan test was performed to compare the three groups. The teeth that showed no sign of healing according to the PAI were separately analyzed by an analysis of variance and a Duncan test. The PAI (n = 50) showed signs of periapical healing over time (p < 0.01). The analysis of variance, based on gray value evaluation (n = 50), also showed signs of periapical healing over time (p < 0.002). The analysis of variance of teeth with the same PAI over time (n = 15 at 3 months, and n = 5 at 6 months), based on gray value evaluation showed statistically significant differences among the 3 groups (p < 0.02). These results show that the gray level correction method is powerful and may reduce the risks of false negative responses during assessment of treatment results or epidemiological studies.