OBJECTIVE: Although there are frequent clinical situations in which esophageal and gastrointestinal stents should be removed, nonsurgical stent removal has been difficult. The purpose of our study was to describe the safety and efficacy of removing the retrievable nitinol stents with a retrieval hook. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Under fluoroscopic guidance, the removal of 119 esophageal, six gastroduodenal, and five rectal retrievable stents was attempted in 113 patients using a retrieval hook. Indications for stent removal included migration (n = 35), severe pain (n = 23), formation of a new stricture (n = 13), incomplete stent expansion (n = 7), airway compression (n = 2), esophagorespiratory fistula (n = 2), malpositioned stent (n = 1), and hematemesis (n = 1). The remaining 46 stents were electively removed. RESULTS: Of the 130 stents, 127 (97.7%) were successfully removed despite the following difficulties: untied drawstrings (n = 4), separation of the stent (n = 3), and fracture (n = 2) or disconnection (n = 2) of a retrieval hook. The removal procedure failed in three cases (2.3%). The causes of failure were the inability to place the hook into the migrated stent (n = 2) and a tight stricture above the migrated stent (n = 1). The procedure-related complications included minor (n = 4) and major (n = 1) bleeding and intramural rupture (n = 3). One patient died of major bleeding after removal of an esophageal stent. CONCLUSION: The stent retrieval hook is useful for removing retrievable esophageal and gastrointestinal stents.
OBJECTIVE: Although there are frequent clinical situations in which esophageal and gastrointestinal stents should be removed, nonsurgical stent removal has been difficult. The purpose of our study was to describe the safety and efficacy of removing the retrievable nitinol stents with a retrieval hook. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Under fluoroscopic guidance, the removal of 119 esophageal, six gastroduodenal, and five rectal retrievable stents was attempted in 113 patients using a retrieval hook. Indications for stent removal included migration (n = 35), severe pain (n = 23), formation of a new stricture (n = 13), incomplete stent expansion (n = 7), airway compression (n = 2), esophagorespiratory fistula (n = 2), malpositioned stent (n = 1), and hematemesis (n = 1). The remaining 46 stents were electively removed. RESULTS: Of the 130 stents, 127 (97.7%) were successfully removed despite the following difficulties: untied drawstrings (n = 4), separation of the stent (n = 3), and fracture (n = 2) or disconnection (n = 2) of a retrieval hook. The removal procedure failed in three cases (2.3%). The causes of failure were the inability to place the hook into the migrated stent (n = 2) and a tight stricture above the migrated stent (n = 1). The procedure-related complications included minor (n = 4) and major (n = 1) bleeding and intramural rupture (n = 3). One patient died of major bleeding after removal of an esophageal stent. CONCLUSION: The stent retrieval hook is useful for removing retrievable esophageal and gastrointestinal stents.
Authors: Saga Persson; Peter Elbe; Ioannis Rouvelas; Mats Lindblad; Koshi Kumagai; Lars Lundell; Magnus Nilsson; Jon A Tsai Journal: World J Gastroenterol Date: 2014-08-14 Impact factor: 5.742