Literature DB >> 15505297

Contrast-enhanced sonographic appearance of hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with cirrhosis: comparison with contrast-enhanced helical CT appearance.

Antonio Giorgio1, Giovanna Ferraioli, Luciano Tarantino, Giorgio de Stefano, Vincenzo Scala, Ferdinando Scarano, Carmine Coppola, Luca Del Viscovo.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We sought to investigate the efficacy of contrast-enhanced sonography using a second-generation contrast agent for the evaluation of hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with cirrhosis by comparing the results to those obtained with contrast-enhanced helical CT. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Between October 2002 and March 2003, 74 patients with cirrhosis (60 men and 14 women; age range, 47-80 years; mean age, 67 years) who had a single nodule of hepatocellular carcinoma were selected to be studied from a cohort of 437 patients with cirrhosis. The size range of the 74 nodules was 9-65 mm (mean, 28.2 mm). Twenty-eight (38%) were 20 mm smaller (range, 9-20 mm; mean, 16.6 mm), and 46 (62%) were larger than 20 mm (range, 21-65 mm; mean, 35.2 mm). Contrast-enhanced sonography was performed at a low mechanical index after IV administration of the contrast agent SonoVue. CT scans were obtained in all patients. The enhancement pattern related to tumor hypervascularity was analyzed. The chi-square test was used for statistical analysis.
RESULTS: For the 28 hepatocellular carcinomas 20 mm or smaller, contrast-enhanced sonography showed 15 (53.6%) as hypervascular and 10 (35.7%) as avascular; three (10.7%) carcinomas were missed. On CT, 12 (42.9%) of the 28 hepatocellular carcinomas appeared hypervascular, 13 (46.4%) appeared hypovascular, and three (10.7%) were missed. For the 46 hepatocellular carcinomas larger than 20 mm, contrast-enhanced sonography showed 42 (91.3%) as hypervascular and four (8.7%) as avascular. On CT, 35 (76.1%) hepatocellular carcinomas appeared hypervascular, eight (17.4%) appeared hypovascular, and three (6.5%) were missed. Differences between CT appearance of hepatocellular carcinomas and contrast-enhanced sonographic appearance of the carcinomas were not statistically significant. Concordance between contrast-enhanced sonographic and CT appearances was observed in 61 (82.4%) of 74 cases.
CONCLUSION: Contrast-enhanced sonography is similar to CT for detecting hepatocellular carcinoma hypervascularity. It could be complementary to conventional unenhanced sonography for evaluation of liver nodules.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15505297     DOI: 10.2214/ajr.183.5.1831319

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  28 in total

1.  Surveillance and diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with cirrhosis.

Authors:  Lorenzo Andreana; Graziella Isgrò; Maria Pleguezuelo; Giacomo Germani; Andrew K Burroughs
Journal:  World J Hepatol       Date:  2009-10-31

2.  Malignant focal liver lesions at contrast-enhanced ultrasonography and magnetic resonance with hepatospecific contrast agent.

Authors:  M D'Onofrio; S Crosara; R De Robertis; S Canestrini; V Cantisani; G Morana; R Pozzi Mucelli
Journal:  Ultrasound       Date:  2013-12-13

3.  Assessment of arterial hypervascularity of hepatocellular carcinoma: comparison of contrast-enhanced US and gadoxetate disodium-enhanced MR imaging.

Authors:  Katsutoshi Sugimoto; Fuminori Moriyasu; Junji Shiraishi; Kazuhiro Saito; Junichi Taira; Toru Saguchi; Yasuharu Imai
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2012-01-24       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 4.  [Ultrasound contrast agents for liver diagnostics].

Authors:  A-J Lemke; S S Chopra; S M Niehues; R Felix
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 0.635

Review 5.  Recent applications of ultrasound: diagnosis and treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Hitoshi Maruyama; Masaaki Ebara
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 3.402

6.  Usefulness of Sonazoid contrast-enhanced ultrasonography for hepatocellular carcinoma: comparison with pathological diagnosis and superparamagnetic iron oxide magnetic resonance images.

Authors:  Keiko Korenaga; Masaaki Korenaga; Matakazu Furukawa; Takahiro Yamasaki; Isao Sakaida
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-04-23       Impact factor: 7.527

7.  The added diagnostic value of 64-row multidetector CT combined with contrast-enhanced US in the evaluation of hepatocellular nodule vascularity: implications in the diagnosis of malignancy in patients with liver cirrhosis.

Authors:  Emilio Quaia; Valerio Alaimo; Elisa Baratella; Alessandro Medeot; Massimo Midiri; Maria Assunta Cova
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2008-09-25       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  Contrast-enhanced ultrasound for characterisation of hepatic lesions appearing non-hypervascular on CT in chronic liver diseases.

Authors:  H Maruyama; M Takahashi; H Ishibashi; M Yoshikawa; O Yokosuka
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2011-01-11       Impact factor: 3.039

9.  Characterization of focal liver lesions: comparative study of contrast-enhanced ultrasound versus spiral computed tomography.

Authors:  V Catala; C Nicolau; R Vilana; M Pages; L Bianchi; M Sanchez; C Bru
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-10-27       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 10.  Imaging of liver cancer.

Authors:  Ben Ariff; Claire R Lloyd; Sameer Khan; Mohamed Shariff; Andrew V Thillainayagam; Devinder S Bansi; Shahid A Khan; Simon D Taylor-Robinson; Adrian K P Lim
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-03-21       Impact factor: 5.742

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.