Literature DB >> 15504902

Developmental regulation of calcium-dependent feedback in Xenopus rods.

Eduardo Solessio1, Shobana S Mani, Nicolas Cuenca, Gustav A Engbretson, Robert B Barlow, Barry E Knox.   

Abstract

The kinetics of activation and inactivation in the phototransduction pathway of developing Xenopus rods were studied. The gain of the activation steps in transduction (amplification) increased and photoresponses became more rapid as the rods matured from the larval to the adult stage. The time to peak was significantly shorter in adults (1.3 s) than tadpoles (2 s). Moreover, adult rods recovered twice as fast from saturating flashes than did larval rods without changes of the dominant time constant (2.5 s). Guanylate cyclase (GC) activity, determined using IBMX steps, increased in adult rods from approximately 1.1 s(-1) to 3.7 s(-1) 5 s after a saturating flash delivering 6,000 photoisomerizations. In larval rods, it increased from 1.8 s(-1) to 4.0 s(-1) 9 s after an equivalent flash. However, the ratio of amplification to the measured dark phosphodiesterase activity was constant. Guanylate cyclase-activating protein (GCAP1) levels and normalized Na+/Ca2+, K+ exchanger currents were increased in adults compared with tadpoles. Together, these results are consistent with the acceleration of the recovery phase in adult rods via developmental regulation of calcium homeostasis. Despite these large changes, the single photon response amplitude was approximately 0.6 pA throughout development. Reduction of calcium feedback with BAPTA increased adult single photon response amplitudes threefold and reduced its cutoff frequency to that observed with tadpole rods. Linear mathematical modeling suggests that calcium-dependent feedback can account for the observed differences in the power spectra of larval and adult rods. We conclude that larval Xenopus maximize sensitivity at the expense of slower response kinetics while adults maximize response kinetics at the expense of sensitivity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15504902      PMCID: PMC2234010          DOI: 10.1085/jgp.200409162

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gen Physiol        ISSN: 0022-1295            Impact factor:   4.086


  48 in total

Review 1.  Adaptation in vertebrate photoreceptors.

Authors:  G L Fain; H R Matthews; M C Cornwall; Y Koutalos
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 37.312

2.  Electrophysiological methods for measurement of activation of phototransduction by bleached visual pigment in salamander photoreceptors.

Authors:  M C Cornwall; G J Jones; V J Kefalov; G L Fain; H R Matthews
Journal:  Methods Enzymol       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 1.600

Review 3.  G proteins and phototransduction.

Authors:  Vadim Y Arshavsky; Trevor D Lamb; Edward N Pugh
Journal:  Annu Rev Physiol       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 19.318

4.  The role of steady phosphodiesterase activity in the kinetics and sensitivity of the light-adapted salamander rod photoresponse.

Authors:  S Nikonov; T D Lamb; E N Pugh
Journal:  J Gen Physiol       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 4.086

5.  Dynamics of cyclic GMP synthesis in retinal rods.

Authors:  Marie E Burns; Ana Mendez; Jeannie Chen; Denis A Baylor
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2002-09-26       Impact factor: 17.173

6.  Two temporal phases of light adaptation in retinal rods.

Authors:  Peter D Calvert; Victor I Govardovskii; Vadim Y Arshavsky; Clint L Makino
Journal:  J Gen Physiol       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 4.086

7.  Origin of reproducibility in the responses of retinal rods to single photons.

Authors:  F Rieke; D A Baylor
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 4.033

8.  Kinetics of desensitization induced by saturating flashes in toad and salamander rods.

Authors:  J G Murnick; T D Lamb
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1996-08-15       Impact factor: 5.182

9.  Rod sensitivity during Xenopus development.

Authors:  Wei-Hong Xiong; King-Wai Yau
Journal:  J Gen Physiol       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 4.086

10.  Light-dependent translocation of arrestin in the absence of rhodopsin phosphorylation and transducin signaling.

Authors:  Ana Mendez; Janis Lem; Melvin Simon; Jeannie Chen
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2003-04-15       Impact factor: 6.167

View more
  7 in total

1.  Reprogramming progeny cells of embryonic RPE to produce photoreceptors: development of advanced photoreceptor traits under the induction of neuroD.

Authors:  Lina Liang; Run-Tao Yan; Xiumei Li; Melissa Chimento; Shu-Zhen Wang
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2008-05-09       Impact factor: 4.799

2.  The phototransduction machinery in the rod outer segment has a strong efficacy gradient.

Authors:  Monica Mazzolini; Giuseppe Facchetti; Laura Andolfi; Remo Proietti Zaccaria; Salvatore Tuccio; Johannes Treu; Claudio Altafini; Enzo M Di Fabrizio; Marco Lazzarino; Gert Rapp; Vincent Torre
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-05-04       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Organization of cGMP sensing structures on the rod photoreceptor outer segment plasma membrane.

Authors:  Ina Nemet; Guilian Tian; Yoshikazu Imanishi
Journal:  Channels (Austin)       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 2.581

Review 4.  Shedding light on cones.

Authors:  Barry E Knox; Eduardo Solessio
Journal:  J Gen Physiol       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 4.086

5.  Neurogenin1 effectively reprograms cultured chick retinal pigment epithelial cells to differentiate toward photoreceptors.

Authors:  Run-Tao Yan; Lina Liang; Wenxin Ma; Xiumei Li; Wenlian Xie; Shu-Zhen Wang
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  2010-02-15       Impact factor: 3.215

6.  Inverted photocurrent responses from amphibian rod photoreceptors: role of membrane voltage in response recovery.

Authors:  Jaakko L P Jarvinen; T D Lamb
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2005-05-26       Impact factor: 5.182

7.  Light responses in rods of vitamin A-deprived Xenopus.

Authors:  Eduardo Solessio; Yumiko Umino; David A Cameron; Ellis Loew; Gustav A Engbretson; Barry E Knox; Robert B Barlow
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2009-04-30       Impact factor: 4.799

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.