| Literature DB >> 15504852 |
Kasia Stepniewska1, Walter R J Taylor, Mayfong Mayxay, Ric Price, Frank Smithuis, Jean-Paul Guthmann, Karen Barnes, Hla Yin Myint, Martin Adjuik, Piero Olliaro, Sasithon Pukrittayakamee, Sornchai Looareesuwan, Tran Tinh Hien, Jeremy Farrar, François Nosten, Nicholas P J Day, Nicholas J White.
Abstract
To determine the optimum duration of follow-up for the assessment of drug efficacy against Plasmodium falciparum malaria, 96 trial arms from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with follow-up of 28 days or longer that were conducted between 1990 and 2003 were analyzed. These trials enrolled 13,772 patients, and participating patients comprised 23% of all patients enrolled in RCTs over the past 40 years; 61 (64%) trial arms were conducted in areas where the rate of malaria transmission was low, and 58 (50%) trial arms were supported by parasite genotyping to distinguish true recrudescences from reinfections. The median overall failure rate reported was 10% (range, 0 to 47%). The widely used day 14 assessment had a sensitivity of between 0 and 37% in identifying treatment failures and had no predictive value. Assessment at day 28 had a sensitivity of 66% overall (28 to 100% in individual trials) but could be used to predict the true failure rate if either parasite genotyping was performed (r(2) = 0.94) or if the entomological inoculation rate was known. In the assessment of drug efficacy against falciparum malaria, 28 days should be the minimum period of follow-up.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2004 PMID: 15504852 PMCID: PMC525402 DOI: 10.1128/AAC.48.11.4271-4280.2004
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother ISSN: 0066-4804 Impact factor: 5.191