Literature DB >> 15504839

Emergence and persistence of macrolide resistance in oropharyngeal flora and elimination of nasal carriage of Staphylococcus aureus after therapy with slow-release clarithromycin: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.

Hans F Berg1, Jeroen H T Tjhie, Gert-Jan Scheffer, Marcel F Peeters, Peter H J van Keulen, Jan A J W Kluytmans, Ellen E Stobberingh.   

Abstract

To investigate the effect of slow-release (SR) clarithromycin on colonization and the development of resistance in oropharyngeal and nasal flora, a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial was performed with 8 weeks of follow-up. A total of 296 patients with documented coronary artery disease were randomized in the preoperative outpatient clinic to receive a daily dose of SR clarithromycin (500 mg) (CL group) or placebo tablets (PB group) until the day of surgery. Nose and throat swabs were taken before the start of therapy, directly after the end of therapy, and 8 weeks later. The presence of potential pathogenic bacteria was determined, and if they were isolated, MIC testing was performed. Quantitative culture on media with and without macrolides was performed for the indigenous oropharyngeal flora. In addition, analysis of the mechanism of resistance was performed with the macrolide-resistant indigenous flora. Basic patient characteristics were comparable in the two treatment groups. The average number of tablets taken was 15 (standard deviation = 6.4). From the throat swabs, Haemophilus parainfluenzae was isolated and carriage was not affected in either of the treatment groups. Nasal carriage of Staphylococcus aureus, however, was significantly reduced in the CL group (from 35.3 to 4.3%) compared to the PB group (from 32.4 to 30.3%) (P < 0.0001; relative risk [RR], 7.0; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.1 to 16.0). Resistance to clarithromycin was present significantly more frequently in H. parainfluenzae in the CL group after treatment (P = 0.007; RR, 1.6; 95% CI, 1.1 to 2.3); also, the percentage of patients with resistance to macrolides in the indigenous flora after treatment was significantly higher in the CL group (31 to 69%) (P < 0.0001; RR, 1.9; 95% CI, 1.4 to 2.5). This persisted for at least 8 weeks. This study shows that besides the effective elimination of nasal carriage of S. aureus, treatment with SR clarithromycin for approximately 2 weeks has a marked and sustained effect on the development of resistance in the oropharyngeal flora for at least 8 weeks.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15504839      PMCID: PMC525455          DOI: 10.1128/AAC.48.11.4183-4188.2004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother        ISSN: 0066-4804            Impact factor:   5.191


  23 in total

1.  Erythromycin as a gastrointestinal prokinetic agent.

Authors:  C Bradley
Journal:  Intensive Crit Care Nurs       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 3.072

Review 2.  Nasal carriage of Staphylococcus aureus: epidemiology, underlying mechanisms, and associated risks.

Authors:  J Kluytmans; A van Belkum; H Verbrugh
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 26.132

Review 3.  The crisis in antibiotic resistance.

Authors:  H C Neu
Journal:  Science       Date:  1992-08-21       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Comparative effects of clarithromycin and erythromycin on the normal intestinal microflora.

Authors:  B Brismar; C Edlund; C E Nord
Journal:  Scand J Infect Dis       Date:  1991

5.  Incidence of community-acquired pneumonia requiring hospitalization. Results of a population-based active surveillance Study in Ohio. The Community-Based Pneumonia Incidence Study Group.

Authors:  B J Marston; J F Plouffe; T M File; B A Hackman; S J Salstrom; H B Lipman; M S Kolczak; R F Breiman
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1997 Aug 11-25

6.  Detection of erythromycin-resistant determinants by PCR.

Authors:  J Sutcliffe; T Grebe; A Tait-Kamradt; L Wondrack
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 5.191

7.  A prospective study of the impact of community-based azithromycin treatment of trachoma on carriage and resistance of Streptococcus pneumoniae.

Authors:  A J Leach; T M Shelby-James; M Mayo; M Gratten; A C Laming; B J Currie; J D Mathews
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 9.079

8.  Staphylococcus aureus nasal carriage and infection in patients on hemodialysis. Efficacy of antibiotic prophylaxis.

Authors:  V L Yu; A Goetz; M Wagener; P B Smith; J D Rihs; J Hanchett; J J Zuravleff
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1986-07-10       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Surgical site infections in orthopedic surgery: the effect of mupirocin nasal ointment in a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study.

Authors:  M D Kalmeijer; H Coertjens; P M van Nieuwland-Bollen; D Bogaers-Hofman; G A J de Baere; A Stuurman; A van Belkum; J A J W Kluytmans
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2002-07-15       Impact factor: 9.079

10.  Streptococcus pneumoniae and Streptococcus pyogenes resistant to macrolides but sensitive to clindamycin: a common resistance pattern mediated by an efflux system.

Authors:  J Sutcliffe; A Tait-Kamradt; L Wondrack
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 5.191

View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  Macrolides: from in vitro anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory properties to clinical practice in respiratory diseases.

Authors:  P Zarogoulidis; N Papanas; I Kioumis; E Chatzaki; E Maltezos; K Zarogoulidis
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2011-11-22       Impact factor: 2.953

2.  Seasonality of antibiotic-resistant streptococcus pneumoniae that causes acute otitis media: a clue for an antibiotic-restriction policy?

Authors:  Ron Dagan; Galia Barkai; Noga Givon-Lavi; Amir Z Sharf; Daniel Vardy; Ted Cohen; Marc Lipsitch; David Greenberg
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  2008-04-15       Impact factor: 5.226

Review 3.  Antimicrobial agent exposure and the emergence and spread of resistant microorganisms: issues associated with study design.

Authors:  C Angebault; A Andremont
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2012-12-27       Impact factor: 3.267

4.  Antibiotics for secondary prevention of coronary heart disease.

Authors:  Naqash J Sethi; Sanam Safi; Steven Kwasi Korang; Asbjørn Hróbjartsson; Maria Skoog; Christian Gluud; Janus C Jakobsen
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-02-23

5.  Adverse events in people taking macrolide antibiotics versus placebo for any indication.

Authors:  Malene Plejdrup Hansen; Anna M Scott; Amanda McCullough; Sarah Thorning; Jeffrey K Aronson; Elaine M Beller; Paul P Glasziou; Tammy C Hoffmann; Justin Clark; Chris B Del Mar
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-01-18

6.  Erythromycin for prokinesis: imprudent prescribing?

Authors:  Martino Dall'Antonia; Mark Wilks; Pietro G Coen; Susan Bragman; Michael R Millar
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 9.097

Review 7.  Resistance decay in individuals after antibiotic exposure in primary care: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Mina Bakhit; Tammy Hoffmann; Anna Mae Scott; Elaine Beller; John Rathbone; Chris Del Mar
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2018-08-07       Impact factor: 8.775

8.  Nasal decolonization of Staphylococcus aureus and the risk of surgical site infection after surgery: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jia Tang; Jiangjin Hui; Jing Ma; Chen Mingquan
Journal:  Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob       Date:  2020-07-30       Impact factor: 3.944

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.