Literature DB >> 15504606

Directionality of hearing in two CF/FM bats, Pteronotus parnellii and Rhinolophus rouxi.

Uwe Firzlaff1, Gerd Schuller.   

Abstract

The head-related transfer function (HRTF) has been measured in two CF/FM bats, Pteronotus parnellii and Rhinolophus rouxi from 575 positions in the frontal hemisphere. P. parnellii showed an increase of the elevation angle of the axis of highest pinna gain with increasing frequency followed by a specific decrease at 75 kHz. Such a drop of elevation angle of the acoustic axis was not seen in R. rouxi. The HRTF further showed a spectral notch dependent on elevation and frequency in P. parnellii, but not in R. rouxi. The functional implications of this difference between both bat species are discussed. Frequencies at maximum pinna gain values did not clearly match the frequencies of the harmonics of the echolocation calls whereas spatial resolution of interaural intensity differences was best in a frequency range that included the higher harmonics of the echolocation calls in both bat species. However, specializations of HRTF patterns matching the exact frequencies of the harmonics of the echolocation calls could not be observed in both bat species.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15504606     DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2004.06.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  7 in total

1.  Theoretical investigation of active listening behavior based on the echolocation of CF-FM bats.

Authors:  Takahiro Hiraga; Yasufumi Yamada; Ryo Kobayashi
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2022-10-07       Impact factor: 4.779

2.  What noseleaves do for FM bats depends on their degree of sensorial specialization.

Authors:  Dieter Vanderelst; Fons De Mey; Herbert Peremans; Inga Geipel; Elisabeth Kalko; Uwe Firzlaff
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-08-16       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Information generated by the moving pinnae of Rhinolophus rouxi: tuning of the morphology at different harmonics.

Authors:  Dieter Vanderelst; Jonas Reijniers; Jan Steckel; Herbert Peremans
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-06-17       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Dominant glint based prey localization in horseshoe bats: a possible strategy for noise rejection.

Authors:  Dieter Vanderelst; Jonas Reijniers; Uwe Firzlaff; Herbert Peremans
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2011-12-01       Impact factor: 4.475

5.  The noseleaf of Rhinolophus formosae focuses the Frequency Modulated (FM) component of the calls.

Authors:  Dieter Vanderelst; Ya-Fu Lee; Inga Geipel; Elisabeth K V Kalko; Yen-Min Kuo; Herbert Peremans
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2013-07-19       Impact factor: 4.566

6.  The aerodynamic cost of head morphology in bats: maybe not as bad as it seems.

Authors:  Dieter Vanderelst; Herbert Peremans; Norizham Abdul Razak; Edouard Verstraelen; Grigorios Dimitriadis; Greg Dimitriadis
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-04       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Sensorimotor Model of Obstacle Avoidance in Echolocating Bats.

Authors:  Dieter Vanderelst; Marc W Holderied; Herbert Peremans
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2015-10-26       Impact factor: 4.475

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.