Literature DB >> 15502975

Kinematic strategies for lowering of upper limbs during suggestions of heaviness: a real-simulator design.

E L Santarcangelo1, E Cavallaro, S Mazzoleni, E Marano, B Ghelarducci, P Dario, S Micera, L Sebastiani.   

Abstract

The aim of the experiment was to study possible differences between the kinematic strategies for the "involuntary" arm lowering of hypnotized highly susceptible subjects (H-Highs) and for the voluntary movement of non-hypnotizable simulators (Sims) during suggestions of arm heaviness (Part I). In addition, a comparison between awake susceptible subjects (W-Highs) and H-Highs was carried out to clarify the specific role of the hypnotic state and hypnotizability (Part II). Subjects' absorption and attentional/imagery capabilities were evaluated through neuropsychological tests. Their arm movements were monitored three-dimensionally at hand, wrist and elbow level through a Polhemus Fastrack system. A final interview collected self-reports concerning the perception of movement involuntariness. Neuropsychological tests showed better "absorption" and imagery capabilities in Highs. In the interview, H-Highs perceived a higher involvement in the task and greater involuntariness and difficulties in contrasting the arm lowering than the Sims. Kinematic analysis showed significant differences between H-Highs and Sims for arm displacements along the vertical axis and on the horizontal plane. In fact, the former lowered the left arm earlier and to a greater degree than the right arm; on the horizontal plane, a forearm flexion was observed for H-Highs on the right side. On comparing W-Highs and H-Highs, hypnosis appeared to magnify the waking motor strategies, but also to induce specific changes, mainly concerning the horizontal plane. These results cannot be interpreted on the basis of "role playing" and socio-cognitive factors. They are believed to be due to a balance between the effectiveness of the frontal executive control towards the selection of behaviors and movement automaticity, which is in line with the neo-dissociation theory of hypnosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15502975     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-004-2112-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  36 in total

1.  Differences in control of limb dynamics during dominant and nondominant arm reaching.

Authors:  R L Sainburg; D Kalakanis
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Evidence for a dynamic-dominance hypothesis of handedness.

Authors:  Robert L Sainburg
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2001-11-22       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Frequency of occurrence of the F wave in distal flexor muscles as a function of hypnotic susceptibility and hypnosis.

Authors:  Enrica Laura Santarcangelo; Knut Busse; Giancarlo Carli
Journal:  Brain Res Cogn Brain Res       Date:  2003-03

4.  Handedness: dominant arm advantages in control of limb dynamics.

Authors:  Leia B Bagesteiro; Robert L Sainburg
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Hypnosis modulates activity in brain structures involved in the regulation of consciousness.

Authors:  Pierre Rainville; Robert K Hofbauer; M Catherine Bushnell; Gary H Duncan; Donald D Price
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2002-08-15       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 6.  The experience of effortlessness in hypnosis: perceived or real?

Authors:  B L Ruehle; H S Zamansky
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Hypn       Date:  1997-04

7.  Openness to absorbing and self-altering experiences ("absorption"), a trait related to hypnotic susceptibility.

Authors:  A Tellegen; G Atkinson
Journal:  J Abnorm Psychol       Date:  1974-06

8.  Sustained attentional and disattentional abilities: differences between low and highly hypnotizable persons.

Authors:  H J Crawford; A M Brown; C E Moon
Journal:  J Abnorm Psychol       Date:  1993-11

9.  Factor analysis and reliability of the Movement Imagery Questionnaire.

Authors:  F Atienza; I Balaguer; M L Garcia-Merita
Journal:  Percept Mot Skills       Date:  1994-06

10.  Attentional functioning in fibromyalgia, rheumatoid arthritis, and musculoskeletal pain patients.

Authors:  Bruce Dick; Chris Eccleston; Geert Crombez
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2002-12-15
View more
  4 in total

1.  Can imagery become reality?

Authors:  E L Santarcangelo; E Scattina; G Carli; B Ghelarducci; P Orsini; D Manzoni
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-09-17       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Hypnotizability and Performance on a Prism Adaptation Test.

Authors:  Manuel Menzocchi; Giulio Mecacci; Andrea Zeppi; Giancarlo Carli; Enrica L Santarcangelo
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 3.847

Review 3.  Common coding and dynamic interactions between observed, imagined, and experienced motor and somatosensory activity.

Authors:  Laura K Case; Jaime Pineda; Vilayanur S Ramachandran
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2015-04-09       Impact factor: 3.139

4.  The body knows what it should do: automatic motor compensation for illusory heaviness contagion.

Authors:  Tomohisa Asai; Eriko Sugimori; Yoshihiko Tanno
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-07-13
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.