Literature DB >> 15502567

Convex growth arrest in the treatment of congenital spinal deformities, revisited.

Akin Uzumcugil1, Akin Cil, Muharrem Yazici, Emre Acaroglu, Ahmet Alanay, Cemalettin Aksoy, Adil Surat.   

Abstract

The authors studied 32 patients to delineate the reliability of well-defined but frequently extended indications to define the ideal patient who will benefit from convex growth arrest. Mean age at the time of convex growth arrest was 29 (range 6-72) months, and average follow-up was 40 (24-120) months. Mean Cobb angle was 55 degrees (31-105 degrees) before surgery and 50 degrees (13-107 degrees) at final follow-up. Thirteen patients (41%) had a true epiphysiodesis effect, while 15 (47%) had fusion and 4 (12%) had progression. The age at surgery, magnitude, length and location of the curve, presence of intraspinal anomaly, and presence of sagittal plane or rib deformity were investigated in terms of the outcome, but none of these parameters was found to have an effect on the outcome. In conclusion, convex growth arrest is a safe and effective method in the management of the young patients with congenital spinal deformities. It can be performed for the balanced and cosmetically acceptable deformities of patients younger than 5 years of age regardless of the type, length, magnitude, and location of the curve, the existence of associated rib fusion, or the presence of sagittal plane abnormality.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15502567     DOI: 10.1097/00004694-200411000-00013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop        ISSN: 0271-6798            Impact factor:   2.324


  9 in total

1.  One-stage posterior-only lumbosacral hemivertebra resection with short segmental fusion: a more than 2-year follow-up.

Authors:  Qianyu Zhuang; Jianguo Zhang; Shugang Li; Shengru Wang; Jianwei Guo; Guixing Qiu
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-05-26       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Convex instrumented hemiepiphysiodesis with concave distraction: a preliminary report.

Authors:  Ahmet Alanay; Ozgur Dede; Muharrem Yazici
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-04-12       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 3.  [Congenital spine deformities during growth : Modern concepts of treatment].

Authors:  Ralf Stücker
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 4.  A comprehensive review of the diagnosis and management of congenital scoliosis.

Authors:  Charles E Mackel; Ajit Jada; Amer F Samdani; James H Stephen; James T Bennett; Ali A Baaj; Steven W Hwang
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2018-08-04       Impact factor: 1.475

5.  Congenital scoliosis - Quo vadis?

Authors:  Ujjwal K Debnath; Vivek Goel; Nanjanduppa Harshavardhana; John K Webb
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 1.251

6.  Growth modulation in the management of growing spine deformities.

Authors:  Ibrahim Akel; Muharrem Yazici
Journal:  J Child Orthop       Date:  2008-11-20       Impact factor: 1.548

Review 7.  Congenital scoliosis: a narrative review and proposal of a treatment algorithm.

Authors:  Amer Sebaaly; Mohammad Daher; Bendy Salameh; Ali Ghoul; Samuel George; Sami Roukoz
Journal:  EFORT Open Rev       Date:  2022-05-05

8.  Is There Still a Place for Convex Hemiepiphysiodesis in Congenital Scoliosis in Young Children? A Long-Term Follow-up.

Authors:  Maroun Rizkallah; Amer Sebaaly; Khalil Kharrat; Gaby Kreichati
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2019-06-23

9.  Posterior hemivertebra resection with unilateral instrumented fusion in children less than 10 years old: preliminary results at minimum 5-year follow-up.

Authors:  Xuhong Xue; Sheng Zhao
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2018-09-20       Impact factor: 2.359

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.