PURPOSE: A novel regimen designed to maximize antileukemia activity of carboplatin through inhibiting repair of platinum-DNA adducts was conducted in poor prognosis, acute leukemia patients. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Patients received fludarabine (10 to 15 mg/m(2) x 5 days), carboplatin (area under the curve 10 to 12 by continuous infusion over 5 days), followed by escalated doses of topotecan infused over 72 hours (fludarabine, carboplatin, topotecan regimen). Twenty-eight patients had acute myelogenous leukemia (7 untreated secondary acute myelogenous leukemia, 11 in first relapse, and 10 in second relapse or refractory), 1 patient had refractory/relapsed acute lymphoblastic leukemia, and 2 patients had untreated chronic myelogenous leukemia blast crisis. Six patients had failed an autologous stem cell transplant. Patients ranged from 19 to 76 (median 54) years. Measurement of platinum-DNA adducts were done in serial bone marrow specimens. RESULTS: Fifteen of 31 patients achieved bone marrow aplasia. Clinical responses included 2 complete response, 4 complete response with persistent thrombocytopenia, and 2 partial response. Prolonged myelosuppression was observed with median time to blood neutrophils >/=200/microl of 28 (0 to 43) days and time to platelets >/=20,000/microl (untransfused) of 40 (24 to 120) days. Grade 3 or greater infections occurred in all of the patients, and there were 2 infection-related deaths. The nonhematologic toxicity profile was acceptable. Five patients subsequently received allografts without early transplant-related mortality. Maximum tolerated dose of fludarabine, carboplatin, topotecan regimen was fludarabine 15 mg/m(2) x 5, carboplatin area under the curve 12, and topotecan 2.55 mg/m(2) over 72 hours. An increase in bone marrow, platinum-DNA adduct formation between the end of carboplatin infusion and 48 hours after the infusion correlated with bone marrow response. CONCLUSIONS: Fludarabine, carboplatin, topotecan regimen is a promising treatment based on potential pharmacodynamic interactions, which merits additional study in poor prognosis, acute leukemia patients.
PURPOSE: A novel regimen designed to maximize antileukemia activity of carboplatin through inhibiting repair of platinum-DNA adducts was conducted in poor prognosis, acute leukemiapatients. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN:Patients received fludarabine (10 to 15 mg/m(2) x 5 days), carboplatin (area under the curve 10 to 12 by continuous infusion over 5 days), followed by escalated doses of topotecan infused over 72 hours (fludarabine, carboplatin, topotecan regimen). Twenty-eight patients had acute myelogenous leukemia (7 untreated secondary acute myelogenous leukemia, 11 in first relapse, and 10 in second relapse or refractory), 1 patient had refractory/relapsed acute lymphoblastic leukemia, and 2 patients had untreated chronic myelogenous leukemia blast crisis. Six patients had failed an autologous stem cell transplant. Patients ranged from 19 to 76 (median 54) years. Measurement of platinum-DNA adducts were done in serial bone marrow specimens. RESULTS: Fifteen of 31 patients achieved bone marrow aplasia. Clinical responses included 2 complete response, 4 complete response with persistent thrombocytopenia, and 2 partial response. Prolonged myelosuppression was observed with median time to blood neutrophils >/=200/microl of 28 (0 to 43) days and time to platelets >/=20,000/microl (untransfused) of 40 (24 to 120) days. Grade 3 or greater infections occurred in all of the patients, and there were 2 infection-related deaths. The nonhematologic toxicity profile was acceptable. Five patients subsequently received allografts without early transplant-related mortality. Maximum tolerated dose of fludarabine, carboplatin, topotecan regimen was fludarabine 15 mg/m(2) x 5, carboplatin area under the curve 12, and topotecan 2.55 mg/m(2) over 72 hours. An increase in bone marrow, platinum-DNA adduct formation between the end of carboplatin infusion and 48 hours after the infusion correlated with bone marrow response. CONCLUSIONS:Fludarabine, carboplatin, topotecan regimen is a promising treatment based on potential pharmacodynamic interactions, which merits additional study in poor prognosis, acute leukemiapatients.
Authors: Sara Nannizzi; Gareth J Veal; Elisa Giovannetti; Valentina Mey; Simona Ricciardi; Christopher J Ottley; Mario Del Tacca; Romano Danesi Journal: Cancer Chemother Pharmacol Date: 2009-12-18 Impact factor: 3.333
Authors: Janelle B Perkins; Steven C Goldstein; Jana L Dawson; Jongphil Kim; Teresa L Field; James S Partyka; Karen K Fields; Beth L Maddox; Christine E Simonelli; Anthony M Neuger; Richard M Lush; Daniel M Sullivan Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2011-10-25 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Penelope R Brock; Rudolf Maibach; Margaret Childs; Kaukab Rajput; Derek Roebuck; Michael J Sullivan; Véronique Laithier; Milind Ronghe; Patrizia Dall'Igna; Eiso Hiyama; Bénédicte Brichard; Jane Skeen; M Elena Mateos; Michael Capra; Arun A Rangaswami; Marc Ansari; Catherine Rechnitzer; Gareth J Veal; Anna Covezzoli; Laurence Brugières; Giorgio Perilongo; Piotr Czauderna; Bruce Morland; Edward A Neuwelt Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2018-06-21 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: G J Veal; J Errington; M J Tilby; A D J Pearson; A B M Foot; H McDowell; C Ellershaw; B Pizer; G M Nowell; D G Pearson; A V Boddy Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2007-02-13 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: Alessia Stornetta; Maike Zimmermann; George D Cimino; Paul T Henderson; Shana J Sturla Journal: Chem Res Toxicol Date: 2017-01-03 Impact factor: 3.739