PURPOSE: This study evaluated the toxicity and efficacy of docetaxel/capecitabine as neoadjuvant treatment for stage 2/3 breast cancer. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Subjects with newly diagnosed invasive stage 2 and 3 breast cancer were eligible. The first cohort of patients was treated at dose A with neoadjuvant docetaxel (75 mg/m(2) i.v. day 1) and capecitabine (1000 mg/m(2) orally twice daily days 2-15) for four cycles. A second cohort of subjects was treated with a reduced dose, dose B, of docetaxel (60 mg/m(2) i.v. day 1) and capecitabine (937.5 mg/m(2) orally twice daily days 2-15). RESULTS: Thirty patients were enrolled. Eight of 10 patients treated at dose A required dose reductions of either docetaxel or capecitabine secondary to grade 3 or 4 toxicities: mucositis (1), hand-foot syndrome (3), diarrhea (2), perirectal abscess (1), and neutropenia (2). Because of a high rate of dose reductions, the next 20 patients were treated at dose B. The mean cumulative administered dose of docetaxel was 285 and 231 mg/m(2) at dose A and dose B, respectively. For capecitabine, the mean cumulative dose at dose A and B were similar at 1585 and 1627 mg/m(2)/day, respectively. The overall clinical response rate was 90% with 31% of patients having a complete response and 59% having a partial response. A pathological complete response in the breast was achieved in 10% of patients after four cycles of docetaxel/capecitabine. CONCLUSIONS: Docetaxel/capecitabine is a highly active regimen in the neoadjuvant setting. Neoadjuvant therapy with 75 mg/m(2) docetaxel and 1600 mg/m(2)/day days 2-15 is recommended.
PURPOSE: This study evaluated the toxicity and efficacy of docetaxel/capecitabine as neoadjuvant treatment for stage 2/3 breast cancer. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Subjects with newly diagnosed invasive stage 2 and 3 breast cancer were eligible. The first cohort of patients was treated at dose A with neoadjuvant docetaxel (75 mg/m(2) i.v. day 1) and capecitabine (1000 mg/m(2) orally twice daily days 2-15) for four cycles. A second cohort of subjects was treated with a reduced dose, dose B, of docetaxel (60 mg/m(2) i.v. day 1) and capecitabine (937.5 mg/m(2) orally twice daily days 2-15). RESULTS: Thirty patients were enrolled. Eight of 10 patients treated at dose A required dose reductions of either docetaxel or capecitabine secondary to grade 3 or 4 toxicities: mucositis (1), hand-foot syndrome (3), diarrhea (2), perirectal abscess (1), and neutropenia (2). Because of a high rate of dose reductions, the next 20 patients were treated at dose B. The mean cumulative administered dose of docetaxel was 285 and 231 mg/m(2) at dose A and dose B, respectively. For capecitabine, the mean cumulative dose at dose A and B were similar at 1585 and 1627 mg/m(2)/day, respectively. The overall clinical response rate was 90% with 31% of patients having a complete response and 59% having a partial response. A pathological complete response in the breast was achieved in 10% of patients after four cycles of docetaxel/capecitabine. CONCLUSIONS:Docetaxel/capecitabine is a highly active regimen in the neoadjuvant setting. Neoadjuvant therapy with 75 mg/m(2) docetaxel and 1600 mg/m(2)/day days 2-15 is recommended.
Authors: Pedro Sánchez-Rovira; Antonio Antón; Agustí Barnadas; Amalia Velasco; María Lomas; María Rodríguez-Pinilla; José Luis Ramírez; César Ramírez; María José Ríos; Eva Castellá; Carmen García-Andrade; Belén San Antonio; Eva Carrasco; José Luis Palacios Journal: Clin Transl Oncol Date: 2012-06 Impact factor: 3.405
Authors: Larissa A Korde; Lara Lusa; Lisa McShane; Peter F Lebowitz; LuAnne Lukes; Kevin Camphausen; Joel S Parker; Sandra M Swain; Kent Hunter; Jo Anne Zujewski Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2010-02 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: E A Perez; D W Hillman; T Dentchev; N A Le-Lindqwister; L H Geeraerts; T R Fitch; H Liu; D L Graham; S P Kahanic; H M Gross; T A Patel; F M Palmieri; A C Dueck Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2009-11-09 Impact factor: 32.976
Authors: M E Straver; E J Th Rutgers; S Rodenhuis; S C Linn; C E Loo; J Wesseling; N S Russell; H S A Oldenburg; N Antonini; M T F D Vrancken Peeters Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2010-04-06 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Bala Basak Oven Ustaalioglu; Mahmut Gumus; Ahmet Bilici; Mesut Seker; Faysal Dane; Taflan Salepci; Tarik Salman; Mehmet Aliustaoglu; Mehmet Eser; Cem Gezen; Mustafa Yaylaci; Nazim Serdar Turhal Journal: Med Oncol Date: 2009-06-02 Impact factor: 3.064
Authors: P F Conte; S Donati; A Gennari; V Guarneri; C Orlandini; M Rondini; M Roncella; L Marini; P Collecchi; P Viacava; A G Naccarato; R Degli Esposti; S Bonardi; A Bottini; S Saracchini; S Tumolo; G Gullo; A Santoro; L Crino Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2005-08-22 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: S Ohno; L W C Chow; N Sato; N Masuda; H Sasano; F Takahashi; H Bando; H Iwata; T Morimoto; S Kamigaki; T Nakayama; S Nakamura; K Kuroi; K Aogi; M Kashiwaba; H Yamashita; K Hisamatsu; Y Ito; Y Yamamoto; T Ueno; E Fakhrejahani; N Yoshida; M Toi Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2013-11 Impact factor: 4.872