Literature DB >> 15501951

Evaluating the efficiency of targeted designs for randomized clinical trials.

Richard Simon1, Aboubakar Maitournam.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Genomic technologies make it increasingly possible to identify patients most likely to benefit from a molecularly targeted drug. This creates the opportunity to conduct targeted clinical trials with eligibility restricted to patients predicted to be responsive to the drug. EXPERIMENTAL
DESIGN: We evaluated the relative efficiency of a targeted clinical trial design to an untargeted design for a randomized clinical trial comparing a new treatment to a control. Efficiency was evaluated with regard to number of patients required for randomization and number required for screening.
RESULTS: The effectiveness of this design, relative to the more traditional design with broader eligibility, depends on multiple factors, including the proportion of responsive patients, the accuracy of the assay for predicting responsiveness, and the degree to which the mechanism of action of the drug is understood. Explicit formulas were derived for computing the relative efficiency of targeted versus untargeted designs.
CONCLUSIONS: Targeted clinical trials can dramatically reduce the number of patients required for study in cases where the mechanism of action of the drug is understood and an accurate assay for responsiveness is available.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15501951     DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-04-0496

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   12.531


  85 in total

1.  Targeted Therapy in Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Andreas Schneeweiss
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2010-06-08       Impact factor: 2.860

Review 2.  Opportunities and challenges facing biomarker development for personalized head and neck cancer treatment.

Authors:  Alexandra Lucs; Benjamin Saltman; Christine H Chung; Bettie M Steinberg; David L Schwartz
Journal:  Head Neck       Date:  2012-01-27       Impact factor: 3.147

3.  Design of a phase III clinical trial with prospective biomarker validation: SWOG S0819.

Authors:  Mary W Redman; John J Crowley; Roy S Herbst; Fred R Hirsch; David R Gandara
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2012-05-16       Impact factor: 12.531

4.  Clinical trials for predictive medicine: new challenges and paradigms.

Authors:  Richard Simon
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2010-03-25       Impact factor: 2.486

5.  Development and Validation of Biomarker Classifiers for Treatment Selection.

Authors:  Richard Simon
Journal:  J Stat Plan Inference       Date:  2008-02-01       Impact factor: 1.111

Review 6.  Biomarker enrichment strategies: matching trial design to biomarker credentials.

Authors:  Boris Freidlin; Edward L Korn
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-11-26       Impact factor: 66.675

Review 7.  Radiation-agent combinations for glioblastoma: challenges in drug development and future considerations.

Authors:  Charles A Kunos; Evanthia Galanis; Jeffrey Buchsbaum; Qian Shi; Lewis C Strauss; C Norman Coleman; Mansoor M Ahmed
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2017-05-30       Impact factor: 4.130

8.  Responsiveness and minimal clinically important differences after cholecystectomy: GIQLI versus SF-36.

Authors:  Hon-Yi Shi; Hao-Hsien Lee; Chong-Chi Chiu; Herng-Chia Chiu; Yih-Huei Uen; King-Teh Lee
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2008-05-03       Impact factor: 3.452

9.  Stratification and partial ascertainment of biomarker value in biomarker-driven clinical trials.

Authors:  Richard Simon
Journal:  J Biopharm Stat       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 1.051

10.  Phase II cancer clinical trials for biomarker-guided treatments.

Authors:  Sin-Ho Jung
Journal:  J Biopharm Stat       Date:  2017-11-27       Impact factor: 1.051

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.