Literature DB >> 15501206

Usefulness of clinical prediction rules for the diagnosis of venous thromboembolism: a systematic review.

Leonardo J Tamariz1, John Eng, Jodi B Segal, Jerry A Krishnan, Dennis T Bolger, Michael B Streiff, Mollie W Jenckes, Eric B Bass.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To summarize the evidence on the predictive value of clinical prediction rules for the diagnosis of venous thromboembolism.
METHODS: We selected all studies in the English literature in which a clinical prediction rule was prospectively validated against a reference standard, and calculated likelihood ratios, predictive values, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve for each prediction rule.
RESULTS: Twenty-three studies met our eligibility criteria: 17 evaluated prediction rules for the diagnosis of deep venous thrombosis and six evaluated rules for pulmonary embolism. The most frequently evaluated prediction rule for deep vein thrombosis was the Wells rule, which had median positive likelihood ratios of 6.62 for patients with a high pretest probability, 1 for moderate pretest probability, and 0.22 for low pretest probability. The median area under the ROC curve was 0.82. Addition of the D-dimer test to the prediction rule increased the median area under the curve to 0.90. The Wells prediction rule was the most commonly studied for pulmonary embolus and had median positive likelihood ratios of 6.75 for those with high pretest probability, 1.82 for moderate pretest probability, and 0.13 for low pretest probability. The median area under the ROC curve was 0.82.
CONCLUSION: The Wells prediction rule is useful in identifying patients at low risk of being diagnosed with venous thromboembolism. The addition of a rapid latex D-dimer assay improved the overall performance of the prediction rule.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15501206     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2004.04.021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Med        ISSN: 0002-9343            Impact factor:   4.965


  13 in total

1.  Single-photon emission computed tomography in the screening for postoperative pulmonary embolism.

Authors:  Taishi Hata; Masataka Ikeda; Shoji Nakamori; Rei Suzuki; Tonsok Kim; Masayoshi Yasui; Ichiro Takemasa; Masakazu Ikenaga; Hirofumi Yamamoto; Masayuki Ohue; Takamichi Murakami; Mitsugu Sekimoto; Masato Sakon; Morito Monden
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2006-09-15       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 2.  [Ventilation-perfusion scintigraphy for the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism].

Authors:  T D Pöppel; B J Krause
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 0.635

3.  Utility of functional status for classifying community versus institutional discharges after inpatient rehabilitation for stroke.

Authors:  Timothy A Reistetter; James E Graham; Anne Deutsch; Carl V Granger; Samuel Markello; Kenneth J Ottenbacher
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 3.966

Review 4.  Findings From 12-lead Electrocardiography That Predict Circulatory Shock From Pulmonary Embolism: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jacob D Shopp; Lauren K Stewart; Thomas W Emmett; Jeffrey A Kline
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2015-09-22       Impact factor: 3.451

5.  Is thromboprophylaxis effective in reducing the pulmonary thromboembolism?

Authors:  Fereshteh Rajabi; Masoumeh Sadeghi; Fereshteh Karbasian; Ali Torkan
Journal:  ARYA Atheroscler       Date:  2012

6.  Venous thromboembolism in urologic surgery: prophylaxis, diagnosis, and treatment.

Authors:  Kevin R Rice; Stephen A Brassell; David G McLeod
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2010

7.  Declining Long-term Risk of Adverse Events after First-time Community-presenting Venous Thromboembolism: The Population-based Worcester VTE Study (1999 to 2009).

Authors:  W Huang; R J Goldberg; A T Cohen; F A Anderson; C I Kiefe; J M Gore; F A Spencer
Journal:  Thromb Res       Date:  2015-04-11       Impact factor: 3.944

8.  Differential biomarker profiles between unprovoked venous thromboembolism and cancer.

Authors:  V Sánchez-López; L Gao; M Ferrer-Galván; E Arellano-Orden; T Elías-Hernández; L Jara-Palomares; M I Asensio-Cruz; M J Castro-Pérez; F J Rodríguez-Martorell; J L Lobo-Beristain; A Ballaz-Quincoces; J L López-Campos; V Vila-Liante; R Otero-Candelera
Journal:  Ann Med       Date:  2020-07-15       Impact factor: 4.709

Review 9.  Review of the evidence on diagnosis of deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism.

Authors:  Jodi B Segal; John Eng; Leonardo J Tamariz; Eric B Bass
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2007 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.166

10.  Factor V leiden thrombophilia in a female collegiate soccer athlete: a case report.

Authors:  Kendra Erickson; Michael E Powers
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2013-02-20       Impact factor: 2.860

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.