Literature DB >> 15500248

Estimation of the number of authentic orphan genes in bacterial genomes.

Satoshi Fukuchi1, Ken Nishikawa.   

Abstract

Genome annotation produces a considerable number of putative proteins lacking sequence similarity to known proteins. These are referred to as "orphans." The proportion of orphan genes varies among genomes, and is independent of genome size. In the present study, we show that the proportion of orphan genes roughly correlates with the isolation index of organisms (IIO), an indicator introduced in the present study, which represents the degree of isolation of a given genome as measured by sequence similarity. However, there are outlier genomes with respect to the linear correlation, consisting of those genomes that may contain excess amounts of orphan genes. Comparisons of genome sequences among closely related strains revealed that some of the annotated genes are not conserved, suggesting that they are ORFs occurring by chance. Exclusion of these non-conserved ORFs within closely related genomes improved the correlation between the proportion of orphan genes and the IIO values. Assuming that the correlation holds in general, this relationship was used to estimate the number of "authentic" orphan genes in a genome. Using this definition of authentic orphan genes, the anomalies arising from over-assignments, e.g., the percentages of structural annotations, were corrected for 16 genomes, including those of five archaea.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15500248

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  DNA Res        ISSN: 1340-2838            Impact factor:   4.458


  8 in total

1.  Proteogenomic analysis of Bradyrhizobium japonicum USDA110 using GenoSuite, an automated multi-algorithmic pipeline.

Authors:  Dhirendra Kumar; Amit Kumar Yadav; Puneet Kumar Kadimi; Shivashankar H Nagaraj; Sean M Grimmond; Debasis Dash
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2013-07-23       Impact factor: 5.911

2.  Stone-dwelling actinobacteria Blastococcus saxobsidens, Modestobacter marinus and Geodermatophilus obscurus proteogenomes.

Authors:  Haïtham Sghaier; Karima Hezbri; Faten Ghodhbane-Gtari; Petar Pujic; Arnab Sen; Daniele Daffonchio; Abdellatif Boudabous; Louis S Tisa; Hans-Peter Klenk; Jean Armengaud; Philippe Normand; Maher Gtari
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2015-06-30       Impact factor: 10.302

3.  A portal for rhizobial genomes: RhizoGATE integrates a Sinorhizobium meliloti genome annotation update with postgenome data.

Authors:  Anke Becker; Melanie J Barnett; Delphine Capela; Michael Dondrup; Paul-Bertram Kamp; Elizaveta Krol; Burkhard Linke; Silvia Rüberg; Kai Runte; Brenda K Schroeder; Stefan Weidner; Svetlana N Yurgel; Jacques Batut; Sharon R Long; Alfred Pühler; Alexander Goesmann
Journal:  J Biotechnol       Date:  2008-12-06       Impact factor: 3.307

4.  On the origin of microbial ORFans: quantifying the strength of the evidence for viral lateral transfer.

Authors:  Yanbin Yin; Daniel Fischer
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2006-08-16       Impact factor: 3.260

5.  Large-scale comparative genomic ranking of taxonomically restricted genes (TRGs) in bacterial and archaeal genomes.

Authors:  Gareth A Wilson; Edward J Feil; Andrew K Lilley; Dawn Field
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2007-03-28       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Transcriptomic characterisation and genomic glimps into the toxigenic dinoflagellate Azadinium spinosum, with emphasis on polykeitde synthase genes.

Authors:  Jan M Meyer; Christian Rödelsperger; Karsten Eichholz; Urban Tillmann; Allan Cembella; Angela McGaughran; Uwe John
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2015-01-23       Impact factor: 3.969

7.  Why so many unknown genes? Partitioning orphans from a representative transcriptome of the lone star tick Amblyomma americanum.

Authors:  Amanda K Gibson; Zach Smith; Clay Fuqua; Keith Clay; John K Colbourne
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2013-02-27       Impact factor: 3.969

8.  The mysterious orphans of Mycoplasmataceae.

Authors:  Tatiana V Tatarinova; Inna Lysnyansky; Yuri V Nikolsky; Alexander Bolshoy
Journal:  Biol Direct       Date:  2016-01-08       Impact factor: 4.540

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.