L Li1, O Manor, C Power. 1. Centre for Paediatric Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Institute of Child Health, 30 Guilford Street, WC1N 1EH London, UK. lli@ich.ucl.ac.uk
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether social inequalities in height change across generations. METHODS: The target population was from the 1958 British birth cohort, all born 3rd-9th March 1958, followed to 1991, and the offspring of one third of this population. Main outcomes were height measured at 7, 11, 16, and 33 years (cohort members) and once at 4-18 years (offspring). Multilevel models applied to associations of social class of origin with (a) child-to-adult growth trajectory (cohort members), (b) height (offspring), and (c) generational height increment. RESULTS: Height inequalities were observed among cohort members, with differences >2.0 cm at all ages between classes I and II, and IV and V. By adulthood, the difference in mean height had declined significantly in boys and slightly in girls. A secular trend was seen between the two generations. While male offspring had a similar mean height to their fathers in classes I and II, boys in classes IV and V gained 2.1 cm (p<0.001). Height gains of female offspring were evident in all classes, with a greater gain in classes IV and V (non-significant). The social class effect on height was weaker among offspring, with a difference between classes I and II, and IV and V of less than 1 cm. CONCLUSIONS: Social inequalities in height observed among the cohort weakened substantially in the next generation due to a greater height gain among offspring from manual classes. Inequalities in childhood height have narrowed between the two generations in this study.
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether social inequalities in height change across generations. METHODS: The target population was from the 1958 British birth cohort, all born 3rd-9th March 1958, followed to 1991, and the offspring of one third of this population. Main outcomes were height measured at 7, 11, 16, and 33 years (cohort members) and once at 4-18 years (offspring). Multilevel models applied to associations of social class of origin with (a) child-to-adult growth trajectory (cohort members), (b) height (offspring), and (c) generational height increment. RESULTS: Height inequalities were observed among cohort members, with differences >2.0 cm at all ages between classes I and II, and IV and V. By adulthood, the difference in mean height had declined significantly in boys and slightly in girls. A secular trend was seen between the two generations. While male offspring had a similar mean height to their fathers in classes I and II, boys in classes IV and V gained 2.1 cm (p<0.001). Height gains of female offspring were evident in all classes, with a greater gain in classes IV and V (non-significant). The social class effect on height was weaker among offspring, with a difference between classes I and II, and IV and V of less than 1 cm. CONCLUSIONS: Social inequalities in height observed among the cohort weakened substantially in the next generation due to a greater height gain among offspring from manual classes. Inequalities in childhood height have narrowed between the two generations in this study.
Authors: Rita Patel; Debbie A Lawlor; Michael S Kramer; George Davey Smith; Natalia Bogdanovich; Lidia Matush; Richard M Martin Journal: Ann Hum Biol Date: 2011-05-19 Impact factor: 1.533
Authors: Alicia Matijasevich; Laura D Howe; Kate Tilling; Iná S Santos; Aluísio J D Barros; Debbie A Lawlor Journal: Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol Date: 2012-01-13 Impact factor: 3.980
Authors: Bruna Galobardes; Valerie A McCormack; Peter McCarron; Laura D Howe; John Lynch; Debbie A Lawlor; George Davey Smith Journal: PLoS One Date: 2012-01-06 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: A S Donin; C M Nightingale; C G Owen; A R Rudnicka; M C McNamara; C J Prynne; A M Stephen; D G Cook; P H Whincup Journal: Br J Nutr Date: 2010-03-16 Impact factor: 3.718
Authors: Pedro Marques-Vidal; George Madeleine; Sarah Romain; Anne Gabriel; Pascal Bovet Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2008-05-19 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Rita Patel; Kate Tilling; Debbie A Lawlor; Laura D Howe; Natalia Bogdanovich; Lidia Matush; Emily Nicoli; Michael S Kramer; Richard M Martin Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2014-09-08 Impact factor: 3.295