Literature DB >> 15498618

Anaphylaxis in the prehospital setting.

Kathleen E Kane1, David C Cone.   

Abstract

Many Emergency Medical Services (EMS) systems have adopted epinephrine auto-injector (EAI) use by Basic Life Support (BLS) personnel, and several states now require that BLS personnel be trained and authorized to use EAIs. The objectives of this observational study were: 1) to examine EMS case definitions of allergy/anaphylaxis, 2) to ascertain the incidence of EMS calls for allergy/anaphylaxis and administration of epinephrine, and 3) to quantify the rate of deaths due to anaphylaxis. Data were solicited by e-mail, mail, and telephone from National Association of State EMS Directors (NASEMSD) members, state EMS offices, and state medical examiner and vital statistics offices. Simple descriptive statistics were used to analyze the data. The following was found: 1) there is no standardization of case definitions among states. Some use the terms "allergic reaction" and "anaphylaxis" in EMS protocols without definition, whereas others provide lengthy, specific definitions, with detailed criteria for epinephrine administration; 2) excluding two outliers at 0.04% and 3.9%, nine EMS system databases totaling over 2.8 million runs contained between 0.34% and 0.82% of runs for allergy/anaphylaxis. Seven of these databases reported on epinephrine administration, with rates between 0.16% and 31.1%, and four of the seven clustered between 8.8% and 14.8%. There was little uniformity in the data provided by seven states on deaths due to anaphylaxis, with rates from 0% to 0.94%. Although limited by the lack of data from many states, roughly 0.5% of EMS runs are for allergy/anaphylaxis complaints, with epinephrine administered in roughly one-tenth of these. State death rates from anaphylaxis vary considerably, with rates from 0% to 0.94% reported.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15498618     DOI: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2004.04.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Emerg Med        ISSN: 0736-4679            Impact factor:   1.484


  6 in total

1.  Pediatric anaphylaxis management in the prehospital setting.

Authors:  Gunjan Kamdar Tiyyagura; Linda Arnold; David C Cone; Melissa Langhan
Journal:  Prehosp Emerg Care       Date:  2013-09-12       Impact factor: 3.077

Review 2.  Anaphylaxis: a history with emphasis on food allergy.

Authors:  Stephen R Boden; A Wesley Burks
Journal:  Immunol Rev       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 12.988

3.  Management of acute allergic reactions by dispatching physicians in a Medical Emergency Dispatch Centre.

Authors:  Hélène Godet-Mardirossian; Nathalie-Sybille Goddet; François Dolveck; Michel Baer; Dominique Fletcher; Alexis Descatha
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2010-10-20       Impact factor: 2.740

4.  Improving diagnostic accuracy of anaphylaxis in the acute care setting.

Authors:  Hjalti M Bjornsson; Charles S Graffeo
Journal:  West J Emerg Med       Date:  2010-12

5.  Pharmacists' response to anaphylaxis in the community (PRAC): a randomised, simulated patient study of pharmacist practice.

Authors:  Sandra M Salter; Brock Delfante; Sarah de Klerk; Frank M Sanfilippo; Rhonda M Clifford
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2014-07-09       Impact factor: 2.692

6.  Anaphylaxis cases presenting to primary care paramedics in Quebec.

Authors:  Nofar Kimchi; Ann Clarke; Jocelyn Moisan; Colette Lachaine; Sebastien La Vieille; Yuka Asai; Lawrence Joseph; Chris Mill; Moshe Ben-Shoshan
Journal:  Immun Inflamm Dis       Date:  2015-08-16
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.