Literature DB >> 15498362

Improvement of cardiac function after transplantation of autologous bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells in patients with acute myocardial infarction.

Shao-liang Chen1, Wu-wang Fang, Jun Qian, Fei Ye, Yu-hao Liu, Shou-jie Shan, Jun-jie Zhang, Song Lin, Lian-ming Liao, Robert Chun Hua Zhao.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The infarct size determines the long-term prognosis of patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). There is a growing interest in repairing scar area by transplanting bone marrow stem cells. However, effectiveness of intracoronary injection of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (BMSCs) in patients with AMI still remains unclear.
METHODS: Sixty-nine patients with AMI after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) were randomly divided into intracoronary injection of BMSCs (n = 34) and saline (control group, n = 35) groups. Serial single positron emission computer tomography (SPECT), cardiac echo and cardiac electromechanical mapping were done at the designed time intervals until six months after transplantation of BMSCs or injection of saline.
RESULTS: The proportion with functional defect decreased significantly in the BMSCs patients after three months [(13 +/- 5)%] compared with that pre-transplantation [(32 +/- 11)%] and the control group [(28 +/- 10)%] at three month follow-up (P < 0.05, respectively). Wall movement velocity over the infracted region increased significantly in the BMSCs group [(4.2 +/- 2.5) cm/s vs (2.2 +/- 1.3) cm/s, P < 0.05], but not in the control group [(2.2 +/- 1.5) cm/s vs (2.7 +/- 1.7) cm/s, P > 0.05]. Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) three months after transplantation in BMSCs group increased significantly compared with that pre-implantation and with that of the control group at three months post-injection [(67 +/- 11)% vs (49 +/- 9)% and (53 +/- 8)%, P < 0.05 respectively]. SPECT scan results showed that perfusion defect was improved significantly in BMSCs group at three-month follow-up compared with that in the control group [(134 +/- 66) cm(2) vs (185 +/- 87) cm(2), P < 0.01]. At the same time, left ventricular end-diastolic volume [(136 +/- 31) ml vs (162 +/- 27) ml, P < 0.05] and end-systolic volume [(63 +/- 20) ml vs (88 +/- 19) ml, P < 0.05] decreased synchronously. The ratio of end-systolic pressure to end-systolic volume [Psyst/ESV, (2.84 +/- 1.30) mmHg/ml vs (1.72 +/- 1.23) mmHg/ml, P < 0.05] increased significantly. Cardiac electromechanical mapping demonstrated significant improvement at three months after implantation of BMSCs compared with that pre-injection in both cardiac mechanical capability as left line local shorting [LLS, (11.29 +/- 1.64)% vs (7.32 +/- 1.86)%, P < 0.05] and electrical property as left ventricular endocardial unipolar voltage [UV, (10.38 +/- 1.12) mV vs (7.61 +/- 1.09) mV, P < 0.01]; perfusion defect decreased from (36.2 +/- 6.2)% to (20.3 +/- 5.31)% (P < 0.01). Twenty-four-hour electrocardiographic monitoring demonstrated no arrhythmias occurred at three-months follow-up.
CONCLUSIONS: The transplantation of BMSCs might improve the cardiac function and it is safe and feasible with no deaths or malignant arrhythmias.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15498362

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)        ISSN: 0366-6999            Impact factor:   2.628


  55 in total

Review 1.  SPECT and PET to optimize cardiac stem cell therapy.

Authors:  Angel T Chan; M Roselle Abraham
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 5.952

2.  Mesenchymal stem cell therapy: Two steps forward, one step back.

Authors:  James Ankrum; Jeffrey M Karp
Journal:  Trends Mol Med       Date:  2010-03-23       Impact factor: 11.951

3.  A Caveat Emptor for myocardial regeneration: mechanical without electrical recovery will not suffice.

Authors:  Ira S Cohen; Amy B Rosen; Glenn R Gaudette
Journal:  J Mol Cell Cardiol       Date:  2006-12-28       Impact factor: 5.000

Review 4.  Cardiac fibrosis: potential therapeutic targets.

Authors:  Shuin Park; Ngoc B Nguyen; Arash Pezhouman; Reza Ardehali
Journal:  Transl Res       Date:  2019-03-09       Impact factor: 7.012

Review 5.  Dental stem cells and their promising role in neural regeneration: an update.

Authors:  W Martens; A Bronckaers; C Politis; R Jacobs; I Lambrichts
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2013-07-12       Impact factor: 3.573

6.  Phenotypic Characterization of Mesenchymal Stem Cells from Various Tissues.

Authors:  Markus Thomas Rojewski; Barbara Maria Weber; Hubert Schrezenmeier
Journal:  Transfus Med Hemother       Date:  2008-05-16       Impact factor: 3.747

Review 7.  Mesenchymal Stem Cells: A Multimodality Option for Wound Healing.

Authors:  Summer E Hanson
Journal:  Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle)       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 4.730

Review 8.  Heart failure management: the present and the future.

Authors:  Mohammad N Jameel; Jianyi Zhang
Journal:  Antioxid Redox Signal       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 8.401

9.  The immunomodulatory activity of human umbilical cord blood-derived mesenchymal stem cells in vitro.

Authors:  Meng Wang; Yuan Yang; Dongming Yang; Fei Luo; Wenjie Liang; Shuquan Guo; Jianzhong Xu
Journal:  Immunology       Date:  2008-06-24       Impact factor: 7.397

Review 10.  Mesenchymal stromal cells: current understanding and clinical status.

Authors:  Husein K Salem; Chris Thiemermann
Journal:  Stem Cells       Date:  2010-03-31       Impact factor: 6.277

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.