Literature DB >> 15498058

Bacterial keratitis in Christchurch, New Zealand, 1997-2001.

Reece C Hall1, Malcolm J McKellar.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To identify which organisms cause bacterial keratitis in a local community and to determine how patients with suspected bacterial keratitis should be initially treated.
METHODS: The results of all corneal scrapes performed in the ophthalmology department of Christchurch Hospital between 1997 and 2001 were reviewed. All samples were collected at the 'bedside' by a technician from the microbiology department and were processed immediately.
RESULTS: Eighty-seven corneal scrapes were performed on 78 patients. There was a positive Gram stain in 43.7% (38/87) of scrapes. There was a positive culture in 58.6% (51/87) of scrapes. The commonest Gram-positive organisms were coagulase negative Staphylococci (19.4%) and Corynebacterium spp. (16.1%). The commonest Gram-negative organisms were Moraxella spp. (19.4%) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (3.2%). Every Gram-positive organism was sensitive to chloramphenicol and every Gram-negative organism was sensitive to ciprofloxacin. In contrast, 89% of Gram-negative organisms were sensitive to chloramphenicol and 88% of Gram-positive organisms were sensitive to ciprofloxacin.
CONCLUSION: The results are very different to those reported by other centres. Most notably, a much higher incidence of infection by Corynebacterium spp. and Moraxella spp. and a lower incidence of Pseudomonas aeruginosa was found. In this centre it appears appropriate to initially treat patients with Gram-positive organisms with chloramphenicol and patients with Gram-negative organisms with ciprofloxacin. Patients with a negative Gram stain should be treated with alternating chloramphenicol and ciprofloxacin while awaiting culture results.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15498058     DOI: 10.1111/j.1442-9071.2004.00867.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Exp Ophthalmol        ISSN: 1442-6404            Impact factor:   4.207


  8 in total

1.  Microbial keratitis at a referral center in Brazil.

Authors:  Angelino Julio Cariello; Renato Magalhães Passos; Maria Cecilia Zorat Yu; Ana Luisa Hofling-Lima
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-03-30       Impact factor: 2.031

2.  Microbiological findings and predisposing risk factors in corneal ulcers.

Authors:  Verena Prokosch; Zisis Gatzioufas; Solon Thanos; Tobias Stupp
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-11-25       Impact factor: 3.117

Review 3.  Geographic variations in microbial keratitis: an analysis of the peer-reviewed literature.

Authors:  Ameet Shah; Arun Sachdev; David Coggon; Parwez Hossain
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-04-08       Impact factor: 4.638

4.  Pathogens and Antibiotic Susceptibilities of Global Bacterial Keratitis: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Zijun Zhang; Kai Cao; Jiamin Liu; Zhenyu Wei; Xizhan Xu; Qingfeng Liang
Journal:  Antibiotics (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-12

5.  Management and treatment of contact lens-related Pseudomonas keratitis.

Authors:  Mark Dp Willcox
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-06-18

6.  Clinical features of infectious keratitis at a tertiary referral center in a rural area of Korea.

Authors:  Seung-Jun Lee; Jang Hun Lee; Moosang Kim; Sang Beom Han; Joon Young Hyon
Journal:  Int Med Case Rep J       Date:  2015-12-07

7.  Spectrum and Sensitivity of Bacterial Keratitis Isolates in Auckland.

Authors:  S Marasini; S Swift; S J Dean; S E Ormonde; J P Craig
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-04-26       Impact factor: 1.909

8.  Bacteriological pattern and their correlation with complications in culture positive cases of acute bacterial conjunctivitis in a tertiary care hospital of upper Assam: A cross sectional study.

Authors:  Anusuya Bhattacharyya; Phulen Sarma; Bhaswati Sarma; Subodh Kumar; Tapan Gogoi; Hardeep Kaur; Manisha Prajapat
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 1.817

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.