Literature DB >> 15497860

Endocrine disrupters in the aquatic environment: the Austrian approach--ARCEM.

W Bursch1, M Fuerhacker, M Gemeiner, B Grillitsch, A Jungbauer, N Kreuzinger, E Moestl, S Scharf, E Schmid, S Skutan, I Walter.   

Abstract

A consortium of Austrian scientists (ARCEM) carried out a multidisciplinary environmental study on Austrian surface and ground waters including chemical monitoring, bioindication, risk assessment and risk management for selected endocrine disrupters: 17beta-estradiol, estriol, estrone, 17alpha-ethinylestradiol, 4-nonylphenol, 4-nonylphenol ethoxylates (4-NP1EO, 4-NP2EO) and their degradation products, ocytlphenol, ocytlphenol ethoxylates (OP1EO, OP2EO) as well as bisphenol A. To obtain data representative for Austria, a material flow analysis served to select relevant compounds and water samples were collected monthly over one year at those sites routinely used in Austrian water quality control. The following results were obtained and conclusions drawn: 1. Chemical monitoring: As compared to other countries, relatively low levels of pollution with endocrine disrupters were detected. 2. Bioindication: In the surface waters under study, male fish showed significant signs of feminization and demasculinization (increased production of the egg-yolk protein and histological changes of the gonads. 3. Risk assessment: For humans, exposure via either drinking water abstraction (ground water) or fish consumption was considered. The exposure levels of the compounds under study were below those considered to result in human health risks. Likewise, for bisphenol A and octylphenols, there was no indication for risk posed upon the aquatic environment (fish). However, nonylphenol or 17alpha-ethinylestradiol exposure along with results of bioindication (2) suggest a borderline estrogenic activity in a considerable number of surface waters. Consequently the emissions of these substances into the surface waters affected have to be reduced. 4. Risk management: Waste water treatment experiments revealed a positive correlation between the removal rate of endocrine disrupters from the waste water and the sludge retention time in the treatment plants. These substances are removed to a higher extend at low loaded plants designed for nutrient removal than at plants that remove carbon and/or employ nitrification only. As to drinking water treatment, chlorine dioxide and ozone were found to eliminate all investigated substances, except nonylphenol ethoxylates. (For the complete study see: www.arcem.at)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15497860

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Water Sci Technol        ISSN: 0273-1223            Impact factor:   1.915


  4 in total

Review 1.  A perspective on the potential risks of emerging contaminants to human and environmental health.

Authors:  Lílian Cristina Pereira; Alecsandra Oliveira de Souza; Mariana Furio Franco Bernardes; Murilo Pazin; Maria Júlia Tasso; Paulo Henrique Pereira; Daniel Junqueira Dorta
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2015-07-24       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  EU Water Framework Directive and Stockholm Convention: can we reach the targets for priority substances and persistent organic pollutants?

Authors:  Maria Fuerhacker
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2009-04-01       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  Using phytoremediation technologies to upgrade waste water treatment in Europe.

Authors:  Peter Schröder; Juan Navarro-Aviñó; Hassan Azaizeh; Avi Golan Goldhirsh; Simona DiGregorio; Tamas Komives; Günter Langergraber; Anton Lenz; Elena Maestri; Abdul R Memon; Alfonso Ranalli; Luca Sebastiani; Stanislav Smrcek; Tomas Vanek; Stephane Vuilleumier; Frieder Wissing
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 5.190

Review 4.  Global Assessment of Bisphenol A in the Environment: Review and Analysis of Its Occurrence and Bioaccumulation.

Authors:  Jone Corrales; Lauren A Kristofco; W Baylor Steele; Brian S Yates; Christopher S Breed; E Spencer Williams; Bryan W Brooks
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2015-07-29       Impact factor: 2.658

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.