Literature DB >> 15497271

Intensive remedial instruction for children with severe reading disabilities: immediate and long-term outcomes from two instructional approaches.

J K Torgesen1, A W Alexander, R K Wagner, C A Rashotte, K K Voeller, T Conway.   

Abstract

Sixty children with severe reading disabilities were randomly assigned to two instructional programs that incorporated principles of effective instruction but differed in depth and extent of instruction in phonemic awareness and phonemic decoding skills. All children received 67.5 hours of one-to-one instruction in two 50-minute sessions per day for 8 weeks. Both instructional programs produced very large improvements in generalized reading skills that were stable over a 2-year follow-up period. When compared to the growth in broad reading ability that the participants made during their previous 16 months in learning disabilities resource rooms, their growth during the intervention produced effect sizes of 4.4 for one of the interventions and 3.9 for the other. Although the children's average scores on reading accuracy and comprehension were in the average range at the end of the follow-up period, measures of reading rate showed continued severe impairment for most of the children. Within 1 year following the intervention, 40% of the children were found to be no longer in need of special education services. The two methods of instruction were not differentially effective for children who entered the study with different levels of phonological ability, and the best overall predictors of long-term growth were resource room teacher ratings of attention/behavior, general verbal ability, and prior levels of component reading skills.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 15497271     DOI: 10.1177/002221940103400104

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Learn Disabil        ISSN: 0022-2194


  86 in total

1.  The importance of measuring growth in response to intervention models: Testing a core assumption.

Authors:  Christopher Schatschneider; Richard K Wagner; Elizabeth C Crawford
Journal:  Learn Individ Differ       Date:  2008

2.  A synthesis of fluency interventions for secondary struggling readers.

Authors:  Jade Wexler; Sharon Vaughn; Meaghan Edmonds; Colleen Klein Reutebuch
Journal:  Read Writ       Date:  2008-06

3.  Intervention Provided to Linguistically Diverse Middle School Students with Severe Reading Difficulties.

Authors:  Carolyn A Denton; Jade Wexler; Sharon Vaughn; Deanna Bryan
Journal:  Learn Disabil Res Pract       Date:  2008-04-11

4.  The Effects of Strategic Counting Instruction, with and without Deliberate Practice, on Number Combination Skill among Students with Mathematics Difficulties.

Authors:  Lynn S Fuchs; Sarah R Powell; Pamela M Seethaler; Paul T Cirino; Jack M Fletcher; Douglas Fuchs; Carol L Hamlett
Journal:  Learn Individ Differ       Date:  2010-04-01

5.  Genetic and Environmental Influences on Vocabulary and Reading Development.

Authors:  Richard K Olson; Janice M Keenan; Brian Byrne; Stefan Samuelsson; William L Coventry; Robin Corley; Sally J Wadsworth; Erik G Willcutt; John C Defries; Bruce F Pennington; Jacqueline Hulslander
Journal:  Sci Stud Read       Date:  2011

6.  WHY INTENSIVE INTERVENTIONS ARE NECESSARY FOR STUDENTS WITH SEVERE READING DIFFICULTIES.

Authors:  Sharon Vaughn; Carolyn A Denton; Jack M Fletcher
Journal:  Psychol Sch       Date:  2010-05

7.  The Efficacy of Repeated Reading and Wide Reading Practice for High School Students with Severe Reading Disabilities.

Authors:  Jade Wexler; Sharon Vaughn; Greg Roberts; Carolyn A Denton
Journal:  Learn Disabil Res Pract       Date:  2010-02-01

Review 8.  Dynamic assessment and response to intervention: two sides of one coin.

Authors:  Elena L Grigorenko
Journal:  J Learn Disabil       Date:  2008-12-10

9.  The Validity of a Holistically Scored Retell Protocol for Determining the Reading Comprehension of Middle School Students.

Authors:  Deborah K Reed; Sharon Vaughn; Yaacov Petscher
Journal:  Learn Disabil Q       Date:  2012-05

10.  Adequate versus inadequate response to reading intervention: an event-related potentials assessment.

Authors:  Peter J Molfese; Jack M Fletcher; Carolyn A Denton
Journal:  Dev Neuropsychol       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 2.253

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.